IBJNews

Judge unseals some Fair Finance raid records

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Federal prosecutors have given some ground in their battle to keep search warrant records in the Fair Finance Co. probe sealed, agreeing to make public the FBI’s November 2009 application to search the company’s Akron, Ohio, headquarters and an inventory of what agents seized.

Judge Sara Lioi of the Northern District of Ohio unsealed the application and inventory this week at the request of prosecutors in Ohio and Indiana. Because a grand jury this month returned felony indictments against Fair co-owners Tim Durham and Jim Cochran, as well as Chief Financial Officer Rick Snow, “the need for sealing has been substantially mitigated,” prosecutors wrote in a filing.

But what was made public shed little new light on the inquiry. The application says the warrant related to an investigation into allegations of wire fraud, money laundering and securities violations. The inventory lists more than 200 items seized, including computers, computer servers and accounting ledgers.

The government did not request the unsealing of what likely would be a much more illuminating document—the FBI affidavit in support of the Fair Finance search warrant.

In their filing, prosecutors wrote: “The affidavit contains substantial substantive investigative information which would greatly prejudice the criminal case in a variety of ways if it were to be made public.”

Indianapolis Business Journal and the Akron Beacon Journal have been pressing in court for more than a year to get a judge to unseal all records related to the Nov. 24, 2009, Fair Finance raid. The newspapers are appealing Judge Lioi’s August 2010 ruling keeping all those documents under wraps.

Prosecutors revealed little about their inquiry until March 16, when they announced the indictment of Durham, Cochran and Snow on 10 counts of wire fraud, one count of securities fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and securities fraud.

The 23-page indictment says the three men worked together to devise and execute a scheme to defraud more than 5,200 Ohio residents who purchased Fair’s unsecured investment certificates. The now-defunct company owes the investors more than $230 million.

Authorities say Durham, the Indianapolis businessman who served as Fair's CEO, doled out loans with abandon to himself, to his businesses and to friends and associates. The loans, which weren’t repaid, stripped Fair of its ability to repay the Ohio investors.

The FBI raid occurred nearly a month after IBJ published an investigative story questioning the propriety of the related-party loans and casting doubt on Fair’s ability to stay afloat.

The indictment reveals that investigators were looking into Fair even before the article appeared. It says that a Fair sales representative on Sept. 11, 2009, provided false and misleading information about the company’s investment certificates to an undercover agent posing as an investor.

FBI agents two months later simultaneously raided Fair’s Akron headquarters and Durham’s office on the top floor of the Chase Tower in downtown Indianapolis.

Documents unsealed this week related only to the Ohio raid, which is the subject of the newspapers’ legal battle. Winfield Ong, an assistant U.S. attorney in Indianapolis, said no similar documents were released in Indiana, and he did not know whether they would be in the future.

Full coverage of the Durham case can be found here.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT