IBJNews

Judge's ruling raises uncertainty for health care execs

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

After a federal judge in Florida struck down the entire health reform law, investors shrugged. But the uncertainty for executives in health care companies increased.

Judge Richard Vinson was the second federal judge to say that the mandate in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which requires nearly all individuals to buy health insurance, exceeds Congress’ authority under the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution. But Vinson far exceeded the December ruling of Judge Henry Hudson by declaring that the individual mandate cannot be separated from the rest of the law, meaning that the entire act must be struck down.

“The market's uncertainty about implementing the Affordability Act just went up exponentially with a second federal judge ruling against it. And, there is nothing like the whole thing being thrown out in a suit 26 states have brought,” wrote health insurance consultant Bob Laszewski on his blog on Monday.

Others, however, said that health care investors already had substantial doubts about the future of the health reform law—even before Vinson’s ruling came down Monday afternoon.

Shares of Indianapolis-based health insurer WellPoint Inc. and Indianapolis-based drugmaker Eli Lilly and Co. rose slightly on Tuesday, but in line with the broader markets. Publicly traded hospital chains—none of which have significant operations in the Indianapolis area—received a similar response from investors.

Barron’s magazine cited Citi analyst Gary Taylor in saying that hospital stocks would have already been trading at higher values if investors truly believed health reform would go ahead unchanged. That’s because the law would create federal subsidies to help 16 million extra Americans buy health insurance and another 16 million get health benefits through the federal-state Medicaid program.

That means 32 million more paying customers for hospitals, insurers and drug companies.

But with the Obama administration appealing all decisions against the law, health care companies and their investors will likely have to wait 18 months before the U.S. Supreme Court settles the legal questions about the law, noted Brian Betner, an attorney at Indianapolis-based health care law firm Hall Render Killian Heath & Lyman.

And even then, there are movements afoot in Congress to alter the law—including House Republicans' vote in January to outright repeal it.

All these clouds make life quite difficult for executives trying to find a winning business strategy.

“If you are a provider, do you now spend millions of dollars developing an Accountable Care Organization? Do you build that new building or make a big technology purchase?” Laszewski wrote. “If you run an insurance company, do you make a big strategic bet on exchanges or [are they] now marginal markets?”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • The end is near
    Health care costs doubled from 8 to 16 percent of the economy in just the last 10 years. They are on track to double again to 32 percent in the next ten and may rise faster as the boomers retire. The middle class can't afford this and will not allow it to happen, mandate or no mandate. The health care executives had better cash in their stock options now and prepare to downsize because a bursting economic bubble is a rough ride on the way down! Once people and companies give up on health insurance, only cost effective health care will have a market and the industry has long forgotten how to provide it!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............

ADVERTISEMENT