IBJNews

Judge's ruling raises uncertainty for health care execs

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

After a federal judge in Florida struck down the entire health reform law, investors shrugged. But the uncertainty for executives in health care companies increased.

Judge Richard Vinson was the second federal judge to say that the mandate in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which requires nearly all individuals to buy health insurance, exceeds Congress’ authority under the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution. But Vinson far exceeded the December ruling of Judge Henry Hudson by declaring that the individual mandate cannot be separated from the rest of the law, meaning that the entire act must be struck down.

“The market's uncertainty about implementing the Affordability Act just went up exponentially with a second federal judge ruling against it. And, there is nothing like the whole thing being thrown out in a suit 26 states have brought,” wrote health insurance consultant Bob Laszewski on his blog on Monday.

Others, however, said that health care investors already had substantial doubts about the future of the health reform law—even before Vinson’s ruling came down Monday afternoon.

Shares of Indianapolis-based health insurer WellPoint Inc. and Indianapolis-based drugmaker Eli Lilly and Co. rose slightly on Tuesday, but in line with the broader markets. Publicly traded hospital chains—none of which have significant operations in the Indianapolis area—received a similar response from investors.

Barron’s magazine cited Citi analyst Gary Taylor in saying that hospital stocks would have already been trading at higher values if investors truly believed health reform would go ahead unchanged. That’s because the law would create federal subsidies to help 16 million extra Americans buy health insurance and another 16 million get health benefits through the federal-state Medicaid program.

That means 32 million more paying customers for hospitals, insurers and drug companies.

But with the Obama administration appealing all decisions against the law, health care companies and their investors will likely have to wait 18 months before the U.S. Supreme Court settles the legal questions about the law, noted Brian Betner, an attorney at Indianapolis-based health care law firm Hall Render Killian Heath & Lyman.

And even then, there are movements afoot in Congress to alter the law—including House Republicans' vote in January to outright repeal it.

All these clouds make life quite difficult for executives trying to find a winning business strategy.

“If you are a provider, do you now spend millions of dollars developing an Accountable Care Organization? Do you build that new building or make a big technology purchase?” Laszewski wrote. “If you run an insurance company, do you make a big strategic bet on exchanges or [are they] now marginal markets?”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • The end is near
    Health care costs doubled from 8 to 16 percent of the economy in just the last 10 years. They are on track to double again to 32 percent in the next ten and may rise faster as the boomers retire. The middle class can't afford this and will not allow it to happen, mandate or no mandate. The health care executives had better cash in their stock options now and prepare to downsize because a bursting economic bubble is a rough ride on the way down! Once people and companies give up on health insurance, only cost effective health care will have a market and the industry has long forgotten how to provide it!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

ADVERTISEMENT