IBJNews

Kodak official: Company keeping R&D center in Ohio

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eastman Kodak Co. reportedly looked at relocating a 500-employee research-and-development center to Indiana, but will instead stay put in Ohio, according to a company official.

The New York-based photography company told economic development officials in Ohio that it was considering moving its Dayton-area plant to New York or Indiana, according to a Sept. 27 report by the Dayton Daily News.

But Thursday, Kodak spokesman Chris Veronda issued a statement that he said makes clear the company will keep its Ohio operations where they are.

"The State of Ohio [tax-incentive] package provides a valuable incentive for our plans to continue investing in our growth initiatives in the Dayton area,” Veronda wrote in an e-mail to IBJ. "In other words, this is a pretty clear statement that Dayton is going to remain home for these operations."

The Ohio Tax Credit Authority approved a 30-percent, 10-year refundable job-retention tax credit for Kodak, according to the Dayton Daily News. Kodak must commit to retain those jobs in Ohio for 13 years.

The idea of moving the Ohio operations to New York made some sense, as struggling Kodak has excess capacity at its Rochester headquarters. But talking to Indiana may have been mostly a negotiating tactic, noted Tim Monger, a site-selection consultant at Cassidy Turley in Indianapolis.

“The Indiana piece sounded to me like leverage with Ohio,” Monger said. A spokeswoman for the Indiana Economic Development Corp. declined to comment on Kodak's possible move.

Kodak’s Ohio R&D center focuses on inkjet technology called Stream, which produces high-end prints of digital images. Kodak, which has been losing money as its annual revenue has declined 16 percent in the past three years, sees these inkjet presses as key to its future.

Kodak’s stock price plunged this week after the company disclosed Monday it was drawing $160 million on its credit line. On Wednesday, debt-rating agencies Moody’s Investors Service and Fitch Ratings Services both downgraded Kodak’s bonds—which already had junk status. Fitch assigned Kodak a rating that indicates a default  “appears probable.”

Kodak’s stock price closed Wednesday at $1.55 per share, down 35 percent since Friday and down 71 percent for the year.

Kodak, a powerhouse until digital cameras destroyed its film business, has struggled to make money in the digital imaging business. But the inkjet business continues to grow, providing hope for the future.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Let's boycott Kodak
    ...oh wait, the market already has.
  • Kodak
    When even stockholders are saying it's time to liquidate, I wouldn't hold out much for these jobs.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT