IBJNews

Kodak official: Company keeping R&D center in Ohio

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eastman Kodak Co. reportedly looked at relocating a 500-employee research-and-development center to Indiana, but will instead stay put in Ohio, according to a company official.

The New York-based photography company told economic development officials in Ohio that it was considering moving its Dayton-area plant to New York or Indiana, according to a Sept. 27 report by the Dayton Daily News.

But Thursday, Kodak spokesman Chris Veronda issued a statement that he said makes clear the company will keep its Ohio operations where they are.

"The State of Ohio [tax-incentive] package provides a valuable incentive for our plans to continue investing in our growth initiatives in the Dayton area,” Veronda wrote in an e-mail to IBJ. "In other words, this is a pretty clear statement that Dayton is going to remain home for these operations."

The Ohio Tax Credit Authority approved a 30-percent, 10-year refundable job-retention tax credit for Kodak, according to the Dayton Daily News. Kodak must commit to retain those jobs in Ohio for 13 years.

The idea of moving the Ohio operations to New York made some sense, as struggling Kodak has excess capacity at its Rochester headquarters. But talking to Indiana may have been mostly a negotiating tactic, noted Tim Monger, a site-selection consultant at Cassidy Turley in Indianapolis.

“The Indiana piece sounded to me like leverage with Ohio,” Monger said. A spokeswoman for the Indiana Economic Development Corp. declined to comment on Kodak's possible move.

Kodak’s Ohio R&D center focuses on inkjet technology called Stream, which produces high-end prints of digital images. Kodak, which has been losing money as its annual revenue has declined 16 percent in the past three years, sees these inkjet presses as key to its future.

Kodak’s stock price plunged this week after the company disclosed Monday it was drawing $160 million on its credit line. On Wednesday, debt-rating agencies Moody’s Investors Service and Fitch Ratings Services both downgraded Kodak’s bonds—which already had junk status. Fitch assigned Kodak a rating that indicates a default  “appears probable.”

Kodak’s stock price closed Wednesday at $1.55 per share, down 35 percent since Friday and down 71 percent for the year.

Kodak, a powerhouse until digital cameras destroyed its film business, has struggled to make money in the digital imaging business. But the inkjet business continues to grow, providing hope for the future.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Let's boycott Kodak
    ...oh wait, the market already has.
  • Kodak
    When even stockholders are saying it's time to liquidate, I wouldn't hold out much for these jobs.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. With Pence running the ship good luck with a new government building on the site. He does everything on the cheap except unnecessary roads line a new beltway( like we need that). Things like state of the art office buildings and light rail will never be seen as an asset to these types. They don't get that these are the things that help a city prosper.

  2. Does the $100,000,000,000 include salaries for members of Congress?

  3. "But that doesn't change how the piece plays to most of the people who will see it." If it stands out so little during the day as you seem to suggest maybe most of the people who actually see it will be those present when it is dark enough to experience its full effects.

  4. That's the mentality of most retail marketers. In this case Leo was asked to build the brand. HHG then had a bad sales quarter and rather than stay the course, now want to go back to the schlock that Zimmerman provides (at a considerable cut in price.) And while HHG salesmen are, by far, the pushiest salesmen I have ever experienced, I believe they are NOT paid on commission. But that doesn't mean they aren't trained to be aggressive.

  5. The reason HHG's sales team hits you from the moment you walk through the door is the same reason car salesmen do the same thing: Commission. HHG's folks are paid by commission they and need to hit sales targets or get cut, while BB does not. The sales figures are aggressive, so turnover rate is high. Electronics are the largest commission earners along with non-needed warranties, service plans etc, known in the industry as 'cheese'. The wholesale base price is listed on the cryptic price tag in the string of numbers near the bar code. Know how to decipher it and you get things at cost, with little to no commission to the sales persons. Whether or not this is fair, is more of a moral question than a financial one.

ADVERTISEMENT