Lawmakers consider state-assisted retirement plan

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

It may soon be easier for Hoosiers to save money under a bill a Senate committee passed Wednesday.

Senate Bill 66 creates a state-assisted savings plan for retirement.

State Sen. Greg Walker, R-Columbus, authored the bill and said it “encourages savings among those in the population today without a savings account offered by an employer.”

Those who sign up for the retirement plan – and have never participated in one before – would receive a $250 incentive in the form of a tax credit. “I believe the credit is a very modest thing to get people to save on their retirement,” Walker said. “We should make an effort to do this.”

SB 66 will now be sent to the Tax and Fiscal Policy Committee where it must pass before continuing to the Senate.

Indiana State Treasurer Richard Mourdock spoke in support of the bill.

“My first reaction was to say no,” Mourdock said. He said he initially did not think the government should get involved in implementing retirement plans.

But then he changed his mind. He said 63 percent of people older than 65 are dependent on Social Security.

The retirement plan is modeled on California’s 401A accounts that allow government bodies to sponsor retirement plans for businesses.

Sen. Phil Boots, R-Crawfordsville, said SB 66 also is based on the 529 plan, which gives parents the opportunity to begin saving money for their children’s college careers.

“It’s essentially a way to get people to save for their retirement because people are not (saving), and they are definitely concerned about not having enough money for retirement,” he said.

Boots said it would take more than $500,000 to begin the program.

And Mourdock said the initial costs are reasonable.

Trenton Hahn, executive director of the Association of Indiana Life Insurance Companies, expressed opposition to the bill. He said the companies he represents already offer plans similar to the one that would be created by bill, and there is ample competition for retirement plans.

Hahn said he would rather see the government “engage in public awareness” for retirement rather than implement a new plan.

Joe Everett, a volunteer for AARP Indiana, said that he was in support of SB 66 because, “Our retirement savings is one of our most important issues for Hoosiers of all ages.”

He said Social Security makes up about 50 percent of the income of Indiana residents 65 years or older, even though it was not designed to be the sole support for a person in their retirement years

“More than 1.4 million working Hoosiers currently do not have access to an employer-sponsored retirement savings plan, such as a 401(K). SB 66 takes a critical step in our effort,” Everett said. “It is a voluntary savings vehicle for those who don’t have access to one through work.”

Everett said AARP will be willing to help bring about awareness should the bill pass.


  • Why not?
    The 529 plan was a great program when I had kids going to college. 20% tax credit and the funds grew tax free. The mutual funds did extremely well for me with very low fees. My wife works for a small employer that can't afford a 401-k. This would be great for her but I do believe we need for details on how it would work. Like do the $ grow tax free? What are the investment options?
  • LOL
    “My first reaction was to say no,” Mourdock said. He said he initially did not think the government should get involved in implementing retirement plans. But he feels government should control a woman's body? LOL. What a buffoon...why is this train wreck even relied upon as a credible source after his disastrous campaign?
  • Indiana 529
    I don't understand Rose's comments, but it looks like a critique of Indiana's 529 plan. The fact is Indiana has one of the top 529 plans in the country. The management fees are low (since the change about 5+ years ago) and the tax breaks make participation a no-brainer for Indiana residents. http://www.savingforcollege.com/5_cap_ratings/
  • Tax and Spend
    Whose 500 mill+ is this? For the purpose of saving money? Grab the $250 and run? WHATEVER
  • Who gets these accounts?
    Grandchild's $$ in 529 can only be put in State selected account (not an Indiana Co.) to get credit. State selected account makes no $$ and requires fees. More targetting of state $$ to friends? Why not allow retirees to use any 529? Wouldn't touch this program.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.