IBJNews

Lawmakers see atmosphere shift inside Indiana Statehouse

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Republican and Democratic legislators stood and applauded in the Indiana House chamber a couple weeks ago after voting unanimously to support a bill that would create a state council to match up available training programs and job opportunities.

While not a contentious topic, the sight on the House floor was a stark contrast to the past couple years, when bitter fights over Republican efforts for the right-to-work law and private school vouchers led thousands of union protesters to fill the Statehouse halls and sparked a five-week boycott by most House Democrats.

The first half of this year's General Assembly session has been much quieter, at least partly because of election victories in November that gave Republicans a larger House majority, preventing new Democratic walkouts from stopping legislative action.

Leaders of the more-powerful Republican supermajorities in the House and Senate haven't walked in lockstep with new GOP Gov. Mike Pence over tax-and-spending issues and have so far only worked around the edges of some potentially divisive issues that their most conservative backers support.

Pence has largely kept a low profile in the Statehouse during his first seven weeks in office, although he has had private meetings with at least three-quarters of the 150 state senators and representatives. Pence was tepid last week with his praise of the General Assembly, saying he "reasonably satisfied" with progress on his priorities so far this session.

But he sounds more critical when it comes to talking about the House budget plan that didn't include his top campaign issue: a 10-percent cut in the state's personal income tax rate.

"I am still disappointed that the House passed a budget that has significant increases in spending and not one cent of new tax relief for individuals, for working families and for most small businesses," Pence said.

House Democrats tried to force Republicans into a vote on the governor's tax cut plan in one of the relatively few edgy floor confrontations during the legislative session's first two months, but GOP House Speaker Brian Bosma declared the move violated a procedural rule. That cleared the way for the House to later send the budget on to the Senate for more debate leading up to the session's deadline in late April.

Bosma and new House Democratic Leader Scott Pelath of Michigan City — who this session replaced longtime Bosma foil and 2011 boycott leader Rep. Pat Bauer — have often praised each other for working to improve the legislative atmosphere.

Pelath says a more civil tone was needed after "a rough past few years." Bosma says "we have a nice mix right now" of personalities.

Democratic lawmakers, however, still maintain Pence and legislative Republicans are squandering chances to quickly spur job growth. They point to GOP differences over Pence's tax proposals and unwillingness to act on implementing the federal health care overhaul.

"We don't have clear message coming from the Republican majorities and the governor," Pelath said. "We don't have a clear direction for Indiana."

Republican leaders bottled up tea party-backed measures challenging the health care overhaul and other federal laws, and a bill that sought to allow the Lord's Prayer to be recited in schools. They also decided to delay until next year a vote on a proposed state constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, while taking up a proposal to require women seeking the abortion pill to first undergo an ultrasound.

Pelath argues that such issues take the Legislature's focus away from trying to boost the state's economy.

"I don't know what's been accomplished other than stoking the Republican base," he said.

Bosma says he considers this year's legislative session positive and productive so far.

It has certainly been quieter. This year's biggest Statehouse protest came when a few hundred people gathered to call for the state to withdraw from a set of national reading and math school standards.

With some Republican legislators even referring during debates to "Speaker Bauer" — a reference to the South Bend Democrat's years preceding Bosma as the one controlling the House gavel — it has certainly been more civil.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Thankfully no mandate for a platform.
    So Rick, are you trying to say that the rural, agriculturally dominated parts of the state, where the GOP overwhelmingly dominates and where the supply of corn far outstrips the demand, do NOT receive subsidies? Are you trying to suggest that those same rural areas are witnessing colossal job growth, thanks to their high concentration of skilled workers? Are you trying to suggest that any growth in the rural counties happens purely through the free market and not because of tax abatements or other incentives? I'm grateful we have at least the semblance of an opposition party (however scrappy it may be) that will help keep the aggressive "conservative platform"--one that has never once helped stem Indiana's relentless brain drain--from turning this state into a cold-weather Dixieland.
  • Get Busy!
    Can we dispense with the absurdity of legislating morality and get busy? Every year, Bosma has to keep a lid on the kooks. Where do these people come from? Abortion ? Like it or not, it's legal. Gay marriage? Like it or not, it's not legally recognized in Indiana (i.e. been there done that and don't need the amendment). Unions? Killed the manufacturing sector 30 years ago, so not a lot of sympathy there. So why do we have to keep hearing about these same old tropes? You people in the legislature need to get things done and quit paying attention to the noisy but irrelevant fringes on both sides.
  • Learned from the best
    Pelath is cut from the same rug (pun intended) of his predecessor with his constant stream of backhanded compliments and insipid editorials such as: "We don't have clear message coming from the Republican majorities and the governor," Pelath said. "We don't have a clear direction for Indiana." Sorry Scott but Indiana DOES have a clear direction. That direction is a conservative platform. The only reason the dems have any seats is because of the metro areas where most of your voting base is union and/or subsidized. Common sense, decency, and morals finally found a state from which to battle the pro-subsidy, pro-homosexual, anti-family, anti-job party.
  • correction to ultrasound
    "...while taking up a proposal to require women seeking the abortion pill to first undergo an ultrasound." To clarify for those that are unaware of what KIND of ultrasound will be required. Via Harvard Health Publication: "For a transvaginal ultrasound, the doctor or technician covers a sensor with a condom and some jelly before inserting it into the vagina." So in short, a woman is penetrated by a radar wand covered in lube and a condom. How very family oriented!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT