Lawmakers seek to piggyback priorities onto other bills

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Spring is in bloom outside the Indiana Statehouse, but lawmakers inside are getting ready to light up the state's biggest "Christmas tree"—the state budget.

Any bill can become a "Christmas tree"—a place for lawmakers to hang a priority that has struggled to win approval on its own. But the budget often looks best to desperate lawmakers because it is the one piece of legislation they must approve before they can split town.

The Indiana General Assembly could wrap up its 2013 session by the end of the week. Lawmakers have already sent at least one hot-button measure, placing new limits on abortion pills, to Gov. Mike Pence. But the majority of contentious items are still being hashed out.

"There's been all sorts of thing put in the budget," said House Minority Leader Scott Pelath, D-Michigan City, when asked to reflect on last-minute surprises he's spotted over his 14 years in the Legislature. He pointed out a tax cut approved in 1999 with aid for developers of mobile home parks. The 2006 legislation authorizing tax increases to pay for Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis also included creation of the Northwest Indiana Regional Development Authority to coordinate projects in that corner of the state.

The germaneness of an issue—how closely it relates to the subject of the original legislation—is often of little concern as legislators scramble, Pelath said.

"Legislative leaders usually find a way if they want to do something, they're usually not perturbed by their germaneness banalities."

Former Gov. Mitch Daniels pushed for years to win his automatic tax refund, introducing it as a stand-alone measure without luck until it was affixed to the budget passed in 2011. Another measure that year, to defund Planned Parenthood, slid through just before the deadline attached to a bill. A federal injunction on the state law remains in place as the issue is being litigated.

There are plenty of contentious measures still seeking a home this year.

House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, ticked down the list:

An effort to back major improvements at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway, either through state grants or state-backed loans, is still being hashed out.

A possible gambling expansion is still on the table, along with changes to how much the industry pays in taxes. Lawmakers are considering adding table games at the state's two horse racing tracks.

"That is obviously one that will keep folks busy, in discussion, right up until the end," he said.

A compromise plan to expand the state's school voucher program is still being worked on, and lawmakers must still decide whether Indiana will participate in the national Common Core education standards.

And lawmakers still have to decide whether they will seek an additional review of the state's plan to buy coal-fired gas from the developers of a plant in Rockport.

"I feel pretty good about reaching a resolution with all of these, with about a week to do so," Bosma said.

That's not to say the state's largest "Christmas tree" is bare. Lawmakers have been putting up and taking down priorities throughout the session.

The budget that passed out of the House included money for one of Bosma's top priorities, a pilot program giving children vouchers to attend preschool.

Senate lawmakers took that down and hung their own proposal for expanding Medicaid using the state's Healthy Indiana Plan in its place.

They might look a little worn out as they traverse the hallways of the Statehouse during their final, grueling week. But most lawmakers will leave town with at least a little "Christmas" cheer.


  • Evaluate Piggyback
    The process of piggyback legislation should be evaluated for effectiveness. Especially if the legislation has previously failed in discussion. The process seems to have some negative issues and may need adjustments.
  • Comedy Central
    Why is it that our State Legislature continues to prove the adage, "Money can truly buy the love and support of a corrupted politician". In Washington, they refer to the sweet deals afforded friends back home as "Earmarks" but I will hold with the premise that sweet deals added to needed statewide legislation as "Kickbacks" for the campaign donations and other sweet deals afforded those who knowingly direct state tax revenues to their friends and campaign supporters.
  • Samuel Clemens
    Mark Twain once wrote that "No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session." How right he was, and now we are entering the most dangerous phase of this year's legislative spectacle of inanity. Fasten your seat belts and hang on to your wallets, folks.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. It is nice and all that the developer grew up here and lives here, but do you think a company that builds and rehabs cottage-style homes has the chops to develop $150 Million of office, retail, and residential? I'm guessing they will quickly be over their skis and begging the city for even more help... This project should occur organically and be developed by those that can handle the size and scope of something like this as several other posters have mentioned.

  2. It amazes me how people with apparently zero knowledge of free markets or capitalism feel the need to read and post on a business journal website. Perhaps the Daily Worker would suit your interests better. It's definitely more sympathetic to your pro government theft views. It's too bad the Star is so awful as I'm sure you would find a much better home there.

  3. In other cities, expensive new construction projects are announced by real estate developers. In Carmel, they are announced by the local mayor. I am so, so glad I don't live in Carmel's taxbase--did you see that Carmel, a small Midwest suburb, has $500 million in debt?? That's unreal! The mayor thinks he's playing with Lego sets and Monopoly money here! Let these projects develop organically without government/taxpayer backing! Also, from a design standpoint, the whole town of Carmel looks comical. Grand, French-style buildings and promenades, sitting next to tire yards. Who do you guys think you are? Just my POV as a recent transplant to Indy.

  4. GeorgeP, you mention "necessities". Where in the announcement did it say anything about basic essentials like groceries? None of the plans and "vision" have basic essentials listed and nothing has been built. Traffic WILL be a nightmare. There is no east/west road capacity. GeorgeP, you also post on www.carmelchatter.com and your posts have repeatedly been proven wrong. You seem to have a fair amount of inside knowledge. Do you work on the third floor of Carmel City Hal?

  5. I don't know about the commuter buses...but it's a huge joke to see these IndyGo buses with just one or two passengers. Absolutely a disgusting waste of TAXPAYER money. Get some cojones and stop funding them. These (all of them) council members work for you. FIRE THEM!