IBJNews

Lawmakers seek to remove Indiana from Common Core

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana is set to scrap a set of contentious federal education standards under legislation on its way to Gov. Mike Pence.

The Indiana Senate voted 35-13 Wednesday to end the state's use of federal Common Core standards and instead adopt a series of state-written guidelines. The legislation dovetails with an effort already underway by the state's education leaders to draw up new standards for determining whether students are ready for college or the workforce.

The Common Core guidelines were pushed with little fanfare in 2010 by former Republican Schools Superintendent Tony Bennett, but have become swept up in controversy.

Opponents of the federal standards have called it an intrusion on state turf. Supporters of the standards say they update and improve education requirements.

State GOP leaders said prior to the General Assembly that it was their goal to drop Common Core.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • More Poor Reporting
    SB 91 does almost nothing. It voids our current state standards, which are Common Core, on July 1. That is also the same date that the State Board is already required to complete its current review of our standards and to adopt new standards. Those new standards can be anything from a complete duplicate of Common Core to something completely different; but the drafts, thus far, are heading towards a set of standards very similar to Common Core with some "Indiana adjustments." Indeed, the fact that this bill does NOT abandon or ban Common Core is demonstrated by the "no" vote that was cast on final passage of this bill by Sen. Scott Schneider, the lead opponent of Common Core and the bill's original author. It is unfortunate for teachers and others who care about this topic that headlines and stories continue to report on "withdraws" from Common Core or "bans" of Common Core. Despite the wishes of its orginal author, SB91 does nothing of the sort.
  • ISTEP next year
    Common core started the same year my daughter started kindergarten. Even if common core is removed next year, we should still see its effects on the ISTEP testing *next* year.
  • Pure Politics
    Not sure why anyone would find comfort with the State GOP leadership setting new educational standards. With a State Legislature controlled by religious fanatics that denounces science, we are likely to see more bible teachings before we see a focus on math and science. Unfortunately, even our public education system has succumbed to political games, while our kids continue to suffer the consequences.
  • Victory!
    Indiana had excellent education standards which can be enhanced. Common Core is the dumbing of America. We are the best country in the world. Indiana has held it's own during this bleak economy. Common Core is pushed by the Feds, education material publishers (including testing) and Bill Gates. It has been sneaking into our schools bit by bit. If you don't get it, help an elementary student with their Math homework. Then you'll see! We need to graduate more and smarter Hoosiers. The whole student...not to train as robots! Ciao Common Core!?!
  • Trainable
    Why should Indiana adhere to national standards when we can set our own lower ones. We want to make Hoosiers unemployable in the other 49 states, therefore they will have to stay in Indiana and work at minimum wage jobs.Yes, We need to chart our own course.(Dum..dum...da...Dum)
  • Choice is good
    Probably better to stay away from "common core." Federal gov't has enough influence. Let the states decide, that way we have 50 options instead of no option. Part of common core is good--setting certain topics that kids should learn--but it goes too far by having the curriculum and textbooks recommended and set by the federal government. I don't want them to have control over how history is painted.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT