IBJNews

Lawsuits filed over school bus crash that killed 2

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Some injuries children suffered in an Indianapolis school bus crash that killed the driver and a student could have been prevented if the bus had seat belts, a lawyer said Thursday.

Attorney Ken Nunn of Bloomington filed two lawsuits in Marion County court this week against Miller Transportation Inc., the company that owned the bus, on behalf of three families whose children were on it when it crashed.

An attorney for Miller Transportation didn't immediately return a phone call seeking comment.

Donasty Smith, 5, and Thomas Spencer II, 60, died in the March 12 crash when the bus carrying 50 children to Indianapolis Lighthouse Charter School collided with a concrete bridge pillar. Ten more students were injured.

The lawsuits claim Miller failed to provide a safe school bus. Nunn said Spencer was wearing a seatbelt when the bus crashed, but there were no seat belts for the children. Indiana does not require seat belts on school buses, although officials say some districts provide them.

Nunn said one of his clients broke his leg when he was hurled out of his seat and slid beneath several rows of seats.

"If he had remained in his seat, he wouldn't have been hurt," Nunn said. He added, "Those kids became human missiles."

Three of the five children Nunn represents, who he said were ages 9 to 14, have leg or ankle injuries, and four have post-traumatic stress, the lawsuits say.

They also claim the company was negligent because it was responsible for Spencer's actions and failed to properly train him or monitor his health. Investigators have said Spencer did not have any type of medical issue.

Nunn said he plans to file more lawsuits, including one against the state of Indiana for not requiring seat belts on school buses. He also plans to lobby legislators to pass a seat-belt law next year.

"The plan is to sue everybody I think was not using their noodle ... and investigate this further," Nunn said.

State Rep. Robert Behning, a Republican from Indianapolis who chairs the House Education Committee, didn't immediately return phone calls seeking comment Thursday.

But he said last week that the issue of school bus restraints may come up in the Legislature next year if media coverage continues or another accident occurs.

Nunn said having seat belts on school buses was "just common sense" because the devices are already required in cars and trucks. "They can tell us it's not required, but if it's not required, why don't they cut the seat belts out of their cars?" he said.

School buses are heavier than normal cars and distribute forces differently after crashes, so riders feel less of an impact. Buses also are designed so that the seats absorb some impact in a crash, protecting riders.

However, the National Transportation Safety Board website says the agency believes additional standards are needed to provide better protection for school bus passengers. Six states require large school buses to come equipped with seat belts.

Michael LaRocco, the state education department's director of school transportation, said last week it would cost about $160 million to equip all of Indiana's 16,000 school buses with effective restraints, and neither the state nor individual districts can afford that.

LaRocco wasn't available for additional comment Thursday.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Quack
    Another attack of the ambulance chasin quack. What a piece of work....
  • Shotgun approach
    I am surprised he didn't sue the bridge-builder for a safer bridge and the city for not providing a road that would automatically steer the bus away from the bridge abuttment. He does want me on his jury or he would most assuredly lose every claim in this article. It is attorneys like him why every product cost some much more than it used to cost so firms can build up a fund to settle these "common sense" issues. In my opinion, attorneys have become like a mondern day Robin Hood only everybody is Prince John from whom attorneys wish to separate from his purse.
  • Ken Nut
    Was'nt Kenny able to get any of the state fair victims? He charged someone that I know for hotel rooms in a city 40 minutes away from Indy when he was representing them in a car wreck claim. Then he took 40% of the settlement. This guy is as crooked as they come. He will charge you for the ink he uses in his pen!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

ADVERTISEMENT