IBJNews

Lawyer: Girls hoops schedule decree sets precedent

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A federal consent decree in which 10 southeastern Indiana high schools agree to schedule girls and boys basketball games equally on Friday and Saturday nights sets a legal precedent for the entire state, one of the attorneys in the case said Tuesday.

The consent decree between Franklin County Community School Corp., former girls basketball coach Amber Parker and nine of its opponent schools calls for girls and boys games to be scheduled equally by the 2016-17 school year, with interim steps until then, said attorney William Groth, who represented Parker in the case.

The decree approved Monday in federal court in Indianapolis applies directly only to the 10 schools but sets a solid legal precedent across the entire 7th U.S. Circuit because the federal appeals court ruled earlier this year that equal scheduling for both genders is required under Title IX of the Higher Education Act, Groth said.

"The 7th Circuit's decision earlier this year sent a clear message not only to the lower federal courts but to all high school athletic directors that Title IX requires equality in all phases of high school athletics, including the scheduling of athletic contests," Groth said.

Parker filed suit in 2009 on behalf of a daughter and while coaching at the school in Brookville, about 60 miles southeast of Indianapolis. She subsequently was fired as girls basketball coach and sued the Franklin County schools separately for retaliation. She won a $28,500 judgment in federal court a year ago, and has moved from Indiana.

"As a coach, I feel it has been a long time coming!" Parker said in a statement distributed through Groth. "On a personal level, it cost me the profession I love but I know that one day I will look back on the impact this decision has had for the girls in Indiana and be proud of the sacrifices and persistence it took to make this happen."

Parker said that if she ever returns to Indiana her youngest daughter, now 4, "will have the pleasure of playing on Friday nights."

Parker's case challenged the practice of schools giving boys' games preference for "prime time," or Friday and Saturday nights and the night before Thanksgiving.

Under the consent decree, Franklin County and the schools it plays agree to schedule at least two more girls games during prime time in 2013-14 than it did in 2011-12, at least four more the following year, and at least six more in 2015-16 until reaching scheduling parity in 2016-17.

"We would have liked to have seen the timetable for getting to full equality accelerated," Groth said. Because schools schedule games years in advance and sign contracts, "we had to agree to phase in these steps toward equality."

The Franklin County schools' superintendent, Debbie Howell, issued a statement saying the district "is pleased that a settlement has been reached that will allow the school corp. to continue to move forward in providing opportunities for both our female and our male student-athletes."

Marcia D. Greenberger, co-president of the National Women's Law Center, said the settlement of the case "is a great victory for the Indiana girls affected by their school's unfair scheduling practices."

"It is simply unacceptable that as standard operating procedure a school would consistently prioritize boys' athletics schedules over that of the girls. This case sends a strong reminder to all schools that they must treat girls fairly in all aspects of athletics," Greenberger said.

Commissioner Bobby Cox of the Indiana High School Athletic Association said it encourages its member schools to provide equity in scheduling, but "there's some schools that have an imbalance."

"Friday and Saturday opportunities for girls have increased over the years," Cox said. However, "some schools may feel the Friday and Saturday nights are not the best opportunities for girls."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Not true
    Dupree, that isn't true. Our high school has several nights where the boys and girls varsity teams both play home games on Friday and/or Saturday nights. The JV boys and girls then play Saturday morning. It is possible and the interest for both is there.
  • I am a sports fan!
    I am a femal sports fan but I am not inclined to watch women's basketball because I would rather watch the BEST, male or female. Boy's basketball draws the crowds, that is why it gets the better schedule! What next! How about scheduling Freshman football on Friday nights and giving Varsity football Saturday mornings? Are we age discriminating by always scheduling varsity on Friday?
  • Now lets force the pep band and fans to attend.
    The schedule was not to discriminate against women. The schedule was to make money. Now girls will play at home on Friday while the boys play away. The girls will drop sports so they can join their friends on Friday nights. It has nothing to do with equal time for females. (I would bet 80% of the coaches and players don't want Friday games.) It is attorney money driven.
  • Really?
    Women's sports won't ever gain an auduience until women become sports fans and support there own, no matter what night they play.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT