IBJNews

LEADING QUESTIONS Not-for-profit prez: 'Take a breath'

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Leading Questions

Welcome to the latest installment of  “Leading Questions: Wisdom from the Corner Office,” where IBJ sits down with one of central Indiana’s top bosses to talk shop about their industry and the habits that lead to success.

Keira Amstutz, 41, took the helm of the Indiana Humanities Council in April 2008, armed with years of experience as an attorney and the director of cultural development for the city of Indianapolis. In no time flat, the economy took a nosedive and the prospects for fundraising darkened.

In the video below, Amstutz discusses how the organization approached the challenge and reveals an almost counterintuitive tip for making a fundraising pitch.



The Council's somewhat esoteric mission is to develop programs and encourage discussion about Indiana culture in the context of history, politics, the arts, agriculture and other areas vital to Hoosier life. True to this thoughtful objective, Amstutz in the video below shares advice on a number of topics—including finding balance and avoiding overthinking—that could be boiled down to "take a breath."


 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Interesting Points
    Very interesting points.
  • Salary analysis of Humanities Council
    OGDEN ON POLITICS SALARY ANALYSIS OF HUMANITIES COUNCIL: 82% spent on salaries

    "Compensation of the Indiana Humanities Council's "current officers, directors, and key employees" on the 2007 tax return is listed as $684,178, which is 82% of the income received in 2007. That is 82% BEFORE considering any other administrative expenses of the Council."

  • Not-for-profit FLUFF
    Bloggers developed a program for discussion of humanity and our interests using a totally free, fully volunteer medium...the blogs! We gain perspective, communicate ideas, participate, do surveys, modify our future behavior, and dissect what happens i our city and state every single day. And we do this without collecting a single penny from the taxpayers.

    In fact, it can be argued that the blogging community was instrumental in creating the core communication vehicle during the 2007 property tax activism that caused our local government spending statewide to decrease $3.1 BILLION in 2010 compared to 2010. And overall we're spending more than $2 BILLION less than we did in 2006.

    On the contrary, we're scratching our heads trying to figure out where Ms. Amstutz delivers the return to the taxpayer investment.

    Perhaps that why it's so hard for her to get up the nerve to "ask for the sale" and then "pause". Maybe it is counter-intuitive for her to do so because on a gut level she knows humanity is getting fleeced.

    Paul Ogden, the attorney who blogs for OgdenOnPolitics.com, dissected the 2007 Humanities Council IRS Statement (the last one made publicly available) this morning and discovered that the salaries of this not-for-profit comprise most of its budget. Where's the 2008 IRS return? We'd like to see that one too! It should be published by now.

    He writes:
    "In the 2007, return $759,250 of the $832,324 in income that year came from government contributions. That's 91% for those of you scoring at home."

    As a taxpayer who pays more in taxes than ever before, this fluffy esoteric "Mission" doesn't sit well.

    I don't begrudge them their mission, I just don't want to pay for it.


Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.

ADVERTISEMENT