IBJNews

Legal battle over Simon estate plan puts big gifts in limbo

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Billionaire mall developer Melvin Simon wanted to leave the Jewish Federation of Greater Indianapolis $10 million, but it could be up to his widow, Bren Simon, whether to fulfill that wish.

The Jewish Federation is one of 10 local or national organizations that together could receive $18.5 million from Melvin Simon’s 2009 estate plan.

Mel Simon Charities factsAmong those in line for a windfall from Simon’s estimated $2 billion fortune are Butler University, Congregation Beth-El Zedeck and The Children’s Museum of Indianapolis.

It’s not clear, however, whether the amounts designated will change, or whether they will be paid at all.

While earlier estate documents said Simon’s trustee “shall” distribute the gifts, the 2009 plan leaves Bren total discretion. According to the trust documents, Bren shall receive assets “with the request, but not the legal obligation” that she fulfill Melvin’s charitable wishes.

The charities appear to have no choice but to stand by for a year or more while a lawsuit seeking to throw out the 2009 plan plays out.

Deborah Simon, one of Melvin’s three children from his first marriage, sued in January, charging he didn’t understand what he was doing when he made the changes in February of last year, seven months before his death at age 82.

Bren, who married Melvin in 1972, contends the new plan reflects his wishes, and that he fully understood what he was doing.

Under the 2009 plan, Bren, 66, would receive half of Simon’s fortune outright, with the other half going into a trust paying her income the rest of her life.

The prior plan would have provided one-third to Bren outright. Another one-third would have gone into a trust paying Bren income during her lifetime, with his children receiving the remainder. The final third would have gone to charitable trusts that were to donate tens of millions of dollars a year to local and national charities.

The changes don’t appear to put into peril high-profile donations for which Melvin and Bren signed formal donor agreements that put the estate on the hook for contributions. Last month, attorneys for Bren at Krieg DeVault notified those recipients—including Indiana University and the Riley Children’s Foundation—that the estate will fulfill those commitments.

In 2006, the couple said they were giving $50 million to create the Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center and fund a faculty and research endowment. The next year, Simon family members, including Melvin and Bren, announced $40 million in gifts toward completion of a 10-story inpatient tower at Riley Hospital for Children.

Attorneys for Bren did not respond to requests for comment. Several organizations named in the 2009 estate plan either declined comment, or could not be reached.

Melvin and Bren Simon in 2007 agreed to give the Children’s Museum $1.2 million, but CEO Jeffrey Patchen said via e-mail, “The Children’s Museum considered its options and determined that not getting involved was the best course of action to take.”

The Children’s Museum’s agreement was with the Simons personally and with a charitable foundation that is not part of the estate.

It and other charities whose fates are uncertain are listed in an appendix to a trust that was revised as part of the 2009 estate plan. The appendix is slightly different from the one attached to the prior trust. It listed $18.9 million in contributions for a dozen organizations.

The revision eliminated $150,000 for the Indianapolis Zoological Society and $100,000 for the Association for the Cure of Cancer of the Prostate. It also reduced from $1 million to $500,000 gifts to the International Council of Shopping Centers, Urban Land Institute and United Way of Central Indiana.

Both versions list $1 million for Butler University. Butler officials are aware the university was named in Simon’s estate plan but have not received verbal or written commitmets, spokeswoman Courtney Tuell said.

The Jewish Federation did not return a phone call.

Beth-El Zedeck could receive $2 million for an endowed construction and maintenance fund. Although the congregation has a lawyer monitoring the suit, President Karl Smith said, “We are just not commenting on the matter at this time.”

Rob MacPherson, vice president of development at the Central Indiana Community Foundation, said that even if the charities had written pledge agreements, those are no guarantee of payment from the estate.

“The donor has the decision all the way up until the final [estate] documents are signed,” he said.

The only rock-solid guarantee, MacPherson said, would be if the pledge were to be paid from an irrevocable trust.

IU and its hospitals say in claims filed in Hamilton County court Feb. 12 that their agreements are irrevocable. Riley Children’s Hospital is counting on $12.5 million from Simon’s estate to pay for construction of the patient tower. The donation agreement calls for a charitable trust to make eight payments, starting one year after Simon’s death, Sept. 16.

The Indiana University Foundation said it still is owed $44 million of the $50 million the Simons pledged for the Simon Cancer Center and to set up the Joshua Max Simon Cancer Research Fund.

IU also is expecting $500,000 for Simon Hall, a science building on the Bloomington campus.•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • So...is Debbie really Greedy?
    Or is what she, and her family, are saying with merit?
    I would find it hard to believe that when Mr. Simon was in better health, and he actively made those donations, that he would want them to be held back. What you have here is bad blood between family members, and it should stay there. They need to work it out, but also stay within the law...
    I don't think Debbie and her siblings are the greedy ones here...

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT