IBJNews

Legislation seeks more aid for college athletes

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An advocacy group is pushing a "bill of rights" for student-athletes aimed at increasing financial assistance to college players.

Among other things, the legislation would require large athletic programs to cover all sports-related medical expenses incurred by athletes. Such programs would also be required to pay into a state trust fund, with the proceeds going to student loan creditors on behalf of former men's basketball and football players who are still in school but have exhausted their athletic eligibility.

In addition, the legislation would require all college athletic programs, regardless of size, to continue providing financial aid to student-athletes whose athletic scholarships are revoked despite being in in good standing.

The National College Players Association says it will push the legislation in at least 15 states this year. State lawmakers in California and Indiana have already committed to pushing versions of the bill, which could include different provisions than the ones proposed by the players association. The Associated Press obtained details of the campaign Monday ahead of its official release.

California state Sen. Alex Padilla, a Los Angeles Democrat who plans to introduce legislation aimed at increasing the support for student-athletes, said the lack of a requirement under NCAA rules for schools to pay for medical coverage or provide academic support for injured student-athletes mean many lose their scholarships "but are also saddled with medical bills they cannot afford."

The campaign comes on the eve of the NCAA's annual convention in Indianapolis, where the Division I Board of Directors will reconsider a plan it approved last fall that would allow schools to award athletes multi-year scholarships. More than 75 schools have requested an override of that plan.

Another rule approved by the board, allowing schools to give athletes a $2,000 stipend for living costs not covered by scholarships, was suspended last month after at least 125 schools objected. At the NCAA meeting, the board can keep the suspension in place until an override vote takes place, eliminate the rule, or amend it.

Ramogi Huma, a former UCLA linebacker who heads the National College Players Association, said his group has been saying for years that the NCAA is incapable of meaningful reform.

"We just saw with the latest reform effort," Huma said. "Even a modest effort at reform failed. It's a dysfunctional system. They have tried to convince us that they will do the right thing for their student-athletes, but they are the entities actively denying their student-athletes basic protections."

NCAA spokeswoman Amy Dunham challenged Huma's characterization of the effort as "failed."

"In fact, the Division I Board of Directors will reconsider each of these proposals through a democratic process whereby member schools with dissenting views are encouraged to be heard," she said in an email. "There are several potential outcomes that could include altering the proposals to address the concerns of those requesting the override."

The college players association's proposals on medical expenses and the trust fund would apply to athletic programs that average $10 million or more in annual TV revenue. The NCAA currently requires schools to certify that an athlete has insurance coverage for athletically-related injuries, up to the deductible of the NCAA Catastrophic Injury Insurance Program (currently $90,000). The insurance coverage can be offered by the school, a parent/guardian, or a personal policy of the athlete.

Dunham said that 95 percent of Division I schools provide such insurance coverage.

While most of the bill's provisions would apply to all college athletes, the trust fund proceeds would be earmarked for men's basketball and football players. In addition to paying off creditors, the trust fund would provide such athletes who have exhausted their athletic eligibility with money to complete their degrees, or money after they earn their degrees.

Huma said that the bill focuses the trust fund on men's basketball and football players because of their low graduation rates, and the fact that they generate the revenue.

Last year, the players association got more than 300 major college football and men's basketball players to sign a petition telling the Indianapolis-based NCAA and college presidents they want a cut of ever-increasing TV sports revenue.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • sports participants
    While I agree sports are great but why do we really need to seek more aide for athletes and why does this aid need to come from the taxpayers???? What is wrong with giving aid to anyone who wants to better themselfs and become a productive person. Are these athletes furthering there education for the schooling or because that is the step between highschool and professional sports..Ignorant idea putting athletes above any other student.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT