IBJNews

Legislative safeguards can't keep state from court

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana conservatives appeared to win major national victories with a trio of laws passed this year cracking down on illegal immigration, defunding abortion clinics and paying for children to attend private schools.

But rebukes from a pair of federal judges and a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the state's sweeping new school voucher law have raised questions about how proposed laws are vetted for legal issues before they get to a vote in the General Assembly.

Lawmakers ultimately decide how Indiana handles hot-button issues, but legislative staff try to raise red flags about clear constitutional violations or other possible missteps along the way, said Jeff Papa, chief of staff to Senate President Pro Tem David Long.

"It's not a hard science," he said.

A pair of federal judges placed temporary holds last month on two key victories for Republicans who control the General Assembly: a plan to block funds to Planned Parenthood of Indiana and portions of a new law that would have broadened police officers' ability to arrest illegal immigrants and blocked the use of foreign identification cards.

In granting a temporary injunction blocking part of the state's new immigration law, U.S. District Judge Sarah Evans Barker said the state's efforts "have proven to be seriously flawed and generally unsuccessful."

The Indiana State Teachers Association filed the most recent challenge to a state law at the start of the month, saying the plan to pay for students to attend private schools violates a clause in the state constitution mandating the state provide a "general and uniform System of Common Schools."

"Sometimes I wonder if you find legislators who just want to push the boundaries on something like that," said Doug Masson, a Lafayette lawyer and veteran observer of Indiana politics.

Masson used to work for Indiana's Legislative Services Agency, which does the grunt work of translating lawmakers' ideas and goals into legislation. LSA lawyers typically alert lawmakers if they spot something that is either unconstitutional or would violate federal law, he said.

Their job, Masson said, is not to make political judgments of whether an idea is good or bad, but to give lawmakers the lay of the land and let them decide whether to proceed from there.

In the past, moderate Republican leaders like Bob Garton, who used to head the Indiana Senate, would often keep hot-button issues like abortion locked away in committees, rather than put lawmakers through a grueling debate or get the state locked up in court, he said.

But supporters of Indiana's controversial new laws say decisions should not be made based on political expediency.

"For many there would be a moral imperative here," said Sen. Greg Walker, R-Columbus, who supported the defunding of Planned Parenthood this last session. Walker unseated the more moderate Garton in 2006.

In the Planned Parenthood case, pro-choice advocates and the Obama administration have argued that the new law clearly violates federal law regulating how billions in Medicaid dollars can be used.

But for people who believe strongly about an issue like abortion, abridging a man-made construct like a federal law is a low hurdle, Walker said.

"What position am I left with other than to say, 'Who gives you the right?'" Walker asked.

Both parties in the Indiana House and Senate maintain their own legal counsel, who guide lawmakers on legal questions and often provide spot answers during contentious debates.

Working in conjunction with the LSA lawyers, the Republican and Democratic advisers try their best to catch obvious mistakes or possible pratfalls, Papa said.

But in the end, whether to pass a law is a political decision made collectively by the state's lawmakers, Papa said.

"They could ask for anything in the world to be drafted, whether it's a good idea, a constitutional idea, or a bad idea," he said. "Then it's up to the political process where you go from there."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Moral imperitive???
    Until legislators quit legislating with a bible in their hands, we will not only be paying their salaries but wasting precious dollars on outrageous attorney fees to defend their "moral" causes. It's a shame that David Long doesn't have the same gumption of Bob Garten. Long coupled with Brian Bosma made the 2011 session a mess for which we still continue to pay. Stop trying to inflict your definition of "moral" on us and get back to what Republicans should be - fiscally conservative and less intrusive government.
  • Judges?
    Our politicians get paid to make the laws....Judges get paid to interpret...Activist judges get paid to act like God.
    IN Supreme Court can't interpret the 4th amendment (Police/State can enter your home at anytime)
    US Supreme Court can't interpret the 4th amendment (Warrantless searches legal for everyone)

    We need better judges....
  • legistrativesafeguard
    What are these politians doing,they get paid to know the laws.If these bills are unconstitutional,we need new legislators,and a new governor.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. The east side does have potential...and I have always thought Washington Scare should become an outlet mall. Anyone remember how popular Eastgate was? Well, Indy has no outlet malls, we have to go to Edinburgh for the deep discounts and I don't understand why. Jim is right. We need a few good eastsiders interested in actually making some noise and trying to change the commerce, culture and stereotypes of the East side. Irvington is very progressive and making great strides, why can't the far east side ride on their coat tails to make some changes?

    2. Boston.com has an article from 2010 where they talk about how Interactions moved to Massachusetts in the year prior. http://www.boston.com/business/technology/innoeco/2010/07/interactions_banks_63_million.html The article includes a link back to that Inside Indiana Business press release I linked to earlier, snarkily noting, "Guess this 2006 plan to create 200-plus new jobs in Indiana didn't exactly work out."

    3. I live on the east side and I have read all your comments. a local paper just did an article on Washington square mall with just as many comments and concerns. I am not sure if they are still around, but there was an east side coalition with good intentions to do good things on the east side. And there is a facebook post that called my eastside indy with many old members of the eastside who voice concerns about the east side of the city. We need to come together and not just complain and moan, but come up with actual concrete solutions, because what Dal said is very very true- the eastside could be a goldmine in the right hands. But if anyone is going damn, and change things, it is us eastside residents

    4. Please go back re-read your economics text book and the fine print on the February 2014 CBO report. A minimum wage increase has never resulted in a net job loss...

    5. The GOP at the Statehouse is more interested in PR to keep their majority, than using it to get anything good actually done. The State continues its downward spiral.

    ADVERTISEMENT