IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEWS: Leguizamo tries out Indy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Lou Harry

This week, a film and theater star uses Indy as a test market, Shakespeare holds a rain-soaked mob, and a somber ISO plows through a Beatles afternoon.

__________

I’m no producer, but I’m convinced that with a show as funny as John Leguizamo’s, he could have easily sold out the Murat or Clowes Hall.

John Leguizamo tried out his latest show—part play, part stand-up comedy, at the IRT. (Photo Courtesy Carol Rosseg)


But the actor known for such films as “Moulin Rouge” and “Romeo + Juliet” had another agenda when he came to town July 31 and Aug. 1. Leguizamo is shaping his latest heading-for-New-York-and-probably-HBO show. And rather than take it to a bigger auditorium, he performed it in front of a small-ish crowd at the Indiana Repertory Theatre July 31 and Aug. 1.

To be clear, this as-yet-untitled show—in the tradition of his acclaimed “Freak” and “Sexoholix”—wasn’t straight stand-up. While the laughs were big and plentiful, Leguizamo’s show did have a narrative arc, albeit loose, to it. And beyond a stool, it also featured two large slide screens, controlled from the stage.

While “Freak” covered much of his family life, this show is shaping up to focus more on the ups and downs, triumphs and bafflements of Leguizamo’s professional career. Big laughs were had from his sharp—and often biting—caricatures of such Hollywood familiars as Al Pacino (whom he worked with on “Carlito’s Way”), Robert De Niro (“The Fan”), and the “baked” Harrison Ford (“Regarding Henry”). Kurt Russell and Steven Seagal (“Executive Decision”) come across particularly badly, but Leguizamo is more than willing to humiliate himself as well, as he does in stories about such fiascos as “Super Mario Bros” (he was Luigi). For nearly 2-1/2 hours, he kept the audience caught up in such tales, offering a kind of “Inside the Not-quite-star Actors Studio.”

The downside, a small one, is Leguizamo’s tendency to resort to bumper-sticker familiar punch lines that cheapen some stories. And he hasn’t yet found the optimal balance of free-standing funny stories and narrative pull. The would-be cathartic conclusion also feels rushed.

But that’s what out-of-town tryouts are for. And I’m thrilled that he chose our town to do his trying.

__________

I had the pleasure on Aug. 1 of hosting the pre-show festivities for Heartland Actors Repertory Theatre’s Shakespeare in the Park production of “Much Ado About Nothing,” which meant welcoming the crowd, introducing musicians Tim Brickley and a student string quartet, offering up some trivia (so which planet has most of its satellites named for the Bard’s characters? Anybody?) and, most enjoyably, watching hundreds of people fill Celebration Amphitheatre at White River State Park.

Heartland Actors Repertory Theatre brought free Shakespeare to White River State Park. (Photo Courtesy White River State Park)

It was heartening to see blankets and chairs and coolers create a patchwork on the terraced hill, knowing this wasn’t for severely truncated or gimmicked-up Shakespeare, but for a just-about-full-length, fairly traditional treatment of the play.

Shifting my role from emcee to audience member (who, I’m not ashamed to confess, had never seen “Much Ado” beyond the lush Kenneth Branagh film version), I found myself quickly charmed by battling Beatrice and Benedick and the efforts of their cronies to make a love connection between them.

The “Othello”-lite plot line of the jealous rift created by Don John to separate swooning lovers Claudio and Hero also was presented with remarkable clarity. I say “remarkable” because, at intermission, I heard a number of people remarking how surprised they were to be understanding—and enjoying—the proceedings. Shakespeare doesn’t seem so hard when you are in the company of professionals.

Chris Hatch, as the enthusiastic Don Pedro, and Charles Goad, transforming from welcoming host to intense betrayed father, were instrumental in forging those human connections between the company and audience.

I was less enamored with the supporting company, which largely seemed to be filling up space. As for Matthew Roland’s Dogberry, I was initially put off by his Python-esque delivery (I kept expecting him to demand … a shrubbery) but came to appreciate his commitment to creating a rounded character out of Shakespeare’s comic creation. If only others in his showcase scene were so committed.

Sound problems that reportedly marred Friday night’s presentation were largely gone by Saturday. The White River melded beautifully with Lindsey Lyddan’s simple stage design. And the rain that doused the audience chased few away, mercifully kept the setting sun from blinding us, and helped elevate a good production of a beautifully written silly comedy into the centerpiece of a warm and wonderful evening. Expect even bigger crowds next year.

__________

Because of the above-mentioned two events, I missed the mob scene at Conner Prairie that greeted the ISO and the faux-Beatles Classical Mystery Tour. I did, however, catch the coffee concert matinee July 31, where the somber, scowling musicians were clearly still reeling from the news that their maestro, Mario Venzago, had been de-batoned not 24 hours earlier.

The four lads did their best, but the (Ob-la-Di, Ob-la-Da) life-goes-on spirit clearly wasn’t in the half-filled house. • 

 

__________

Visit ibj.com/arts for additional reviews, previews and arts discussion. Twitter: IBJarts

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT