IBJNews

Lenders attempting to foreclose on Broadbent headquarters

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Lenders are attempting to foreclose on The Broadbent Co.'s downtown headquarters as part of a $25 million federal lawsuit against the Indianapolis-based real estate developer.

The Huntington National Bank and PNC Bank filed the complaint in U.S. District Court in Indianapolis on July 22, charging that Broadbent defaulted on various construction loans and mortgages dating from February 2007.

Broadbent, a strip-center real estate specialist, borrowed money to buy and renovate its headquarters at 117 E. Washington St. The company moved into the structure, formerly known as the Zipper Building, in October 2007 after a massive renovation project overhauled the 50-year-old building.

Broadbent Co. headquartersBroadbent did an extensive renovation on its downtown headquarters. (IBJ Photo/Andrea Muirragui Davis)

But the company has struggled during the downturn in the commercial real estate market and is facing a barrage of lawsuits as it attempts to reorganize certain properties under bankruptcy protection.

Broadbent’s financial hardships have become so severe that Huntington disclosed in the lawsuit that the company is attempting to sell its headquarters. An appraisals showed the value of the building declined from $12.6 million in January 2007 to $6.5 million in April 2011, according to the lawsuit.

It's not clear from the suit how much of the money Broadbent borrowed using the headquarters as collateral went toward the purchase and renovation of the building. Broadbent's original construction loan to renovate the property was for $11 million, the lenders said. The company took out a subsequent term loan related to the building, according to the lawsuit.

In March, “Broadbent informed HNB that, due to ‘economic changes,’ the property no longer was providing sufficient revenue to allow them to continue making monthly payments of both principal and interest on the project loan and the term loan, and Broadbent requested that lenders agree to modify the terms,” court documents said.

HNB said it declined to modify the terms of the loan after Broadbent failed to make principal payments due on March 10. The company instead paid only the monthly interest amount due on the loans, according to the complaint.

Exacerbating Broadbent’s financial challenges are four unrelated unpaid court judgments either PNC or Huntington have obtained against the company totaling $17.3 million. The judgments involved project loans the banks made to Broadbent for strip center developments.

George P. Broadbent, who is named in the latest suit brought by Huntington and PNC, co-founded the real estate company in 1972.

An attorney for Broadbent, Erick D. Ponader of Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP, couldn’t immediately be reached for comment Thursday morning.

Earlier this month, IBJ reported that George Broadbent sold The Broadbent Co. to his wife, Mary Clare Broadbent, for $50,000 in March 2010 as the mounting lawsuits threatened his control of the company.

As lenders circled, Broadbent also transferred his ownership interests in five retail properties to his wife for “estate planning reasons,” and sold to her his ownership interest in nine other properties for $150,000, court records show.

Broadbent’s properties seeking bankruptcy reorganization include the Castleton Plaza and Greenwood Pointe shopping centers.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The Fringe! Plus, the simple fact that there are so many local faves in such close proximity to each other.

  2. I remenber, watching the toll road, being built, through South Bend, when I was 10 years old. I believe, back then that it was estimated, that the toll road, would be paid for in 20 years and then it would be free. I am now 71, what happened? Since the power is in the people, by that, I mean that, we the people are in total control of everything. I, suggest that no one ever use the toll road again, let it go broke. We the people can control the price of everything, from groceries to gas, if we would just do it. If we don't pay the asking price, the sellers will lower the price and if we wait awhile, they will lower the price to what we accept as reasonable. I would like to know why a highway like interstate 94, is so well maintained, a much better highway, than the toll road, but has no tolls. I would also like to know why, a sitting governor, with a term limit, maximum of eight years, can lease, public property, for 75 years. Even though I have transponders in both of my trucks and will not be affected by the increase, I have been and will contine to avoid using the toll road. I make many trips from northern Indiana to Chicago, every year, and I prefer the better highway, I94!

  3. Coming from her background,she should be used to those kinds of advances! Menard probably figured it was ok to tuck a buck!

  4. I'm still waiting for the list of available, high quality apartments in the Village.

  5. This criminal masquerading as a lawyer obviously has serious issues. He’s been proven by his own testimony to be a pathological liar and probably has a personality disorder as he seems to be constructing a reality around himself. He places no value on truth, honesty or loyalty as evidenced by what he has done to his clients and his own family. And by the demands and lies he has made in court, it is evident he feels entitled to do and say whatever suits his purpose and everyone else is expected to nod obediently and believe him because he is, after all, Bill Super Lawyer; or BS lawyer for short. This millionaire wanna-be no longer owns anything of value; he squandered it and put everything he had into foreclosure. He has no money, house, car, boat or vacation home left to show for what he earned or what he stole. He’s just another loser without morals who will be doing time. I’m certain all of his courtroom shenanigans are antagonizing his poor victims. As Lamar said, his behavior and claims in court have been outrageous. The judge needs to be more than concerned; he needs to be judicial and end this nonsense.

ADVERTISEMENT