IBJNews

Lilly: Forget Alzheimer's; think diabetes

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

For more than a year, Eli Lilly and Co. has been viewed by investors as a laggard stock with one, slim shot at producing a huge jackpot: its experimental Alzheimer’s drug. But now company leaders are trying to direct investor attention toward what they view as a sure-fire bet: the drugmaker’s diabetes portfolio.

Lilly brass spent significant time during an investor conference call last month talking up their diabetes pipeline. Then last week they scheduled a special 90-minute call on June 11 that will be devoted to nothing but the diabetes pipeline.

There’s good reason for this. Some analysts put the chances of success of solanezumab, Lilly’s experimental Alzheimer’s medicine, at 10 percent or less. If it succeeds, the drug could generate $10 billion in annual sales and negate challenges posed by the string of patent loses on blockbuster drugs through which Lilly is suffering.

But diabetes has a 100-percent chance of bringing Lilly significantly more revenue over the next few years, as the incidence of the chronic disease rises sharply across the globe. That will help Lilly sell more of its insulins and its latest product, called Tradjenta.

Most analysts expect Lilly’s diabetes sales to grow more than 30 percent over the next four years—even before any new drugs coming out of its pipeline. That would mean an additional $1.3 billion in annual revenue.

And if the pipeline starts producing winners, the potential is even greater.

“LLY has one of the most attractive diabetes portfolios amongst its peer group,” Barclays Capital analyst Tony Butler wrote in an April 25 research note, referring to Lilly by its ticker symbol. “While there are inherent risks in all clinical programs, we believe diabetes could be an area that offers a lower risk profile as compared to that of Alzheimer’s or oncology.”

What’s in Lilly’s diabetes pipeline? A drug called empagliflozin is designed to boost glucose re-absorption in patients' kidneys, thus reducing levels of glucose in their blood.

Another drug is a glucagon-like peptide called dulaglutide, which Lilly thinks so highly of that it sold off its rights to the pioneer of this class of drugs, Byetta, which it launched in 2005 along with the drug’s creator, California-based Amylin Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Also, Lilly is developing two once-daily basal insulins—which if approved could finally stem the losses Lilly has suffered since the 2000 launch of the first basal insulin, Lantus.

“So I think all of this augurs well for us being able to offer a broad range of products to the dietologist, to the physician to really focus on what the patient needs and not just on what we have to offer,” Lilly CEO John Lechleiter said during the April 25 conference call.

Lilly is admittedly trying to play catch up to Denmark-based Novo Nordisk A/S and France-based Sanofi-Aventis SA in the diabetes business. In 1923, Lilly was the global pioneer of insulin. But its diabetes sales in recent years have grown half as fast as the overall global market.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Doug Henning!

  2. These guy were thugs — they grew up in freaking Haughville! Smh, sigh. If the mayor needs/wants "quality" Black Hoosiers who are NOT corrupt, give me a call — I know plenty. Land bank info here - http://www.kubepharm.com/indylandbank/IndyLandBank.html

  3. Magician and illusionist!

  4. The basic idea of nice apartments with parking and retail is a good one, but this design seems overwhelmingly big/tall for Broad Ripple. The size could be disguised a bit with lots of big trees/landscaping, but the complex is too massive to blend in easily. That section of canal between College and Westfield will also need to be upgraded on both sides. Nice apartments facing onto a nice promenade with shade trees/plantings could bring together the canal towpath/Monon recreation, the outdoor seating at existing restaurants, and this project into something that upgrades the whole area. A plan for the whole stretch makes more sense than facing nice new housing onto what looks like a ditch. Is there a plan? Does the public have input? Who pays? The apartment idea seems to be reasonable, but Whole Foods is not a good idea for appropriate retail. Besides the store being physically too big, there are already Fresh Market at 54xCollege and Whole Foods in Nora for fancy groceries. Good Earth and Kroger are within walking distance of the Shell site. There are at least 7 grocery stores within a safe bike ride. Whole Foods would add nothing but traffic congestion. This design is on the right track, but there needs to be more work done to ensure that it blends in with and enhances the existing community. A project that large will set a tone for that whole part of town. It could be a real asset, but only if done right.

  5. I did not move to Zionsville to live in Carmel. This and the subsequent developments to follow will ensure a vanilla uniformity of strip malls and apartment buildings as we seek to bring our town down to the least common denominator. We were warned before recent elections that pro-development council members would make sure their friends (landowners and developers) would be able to make their millions off of the exploitation of Zionsville. Why in God's name would we sell out the best preserved small town in the State of Indiana?

ADVERTISEMENT