IBJNews

Lilly aims to submit five new drugs for approval

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

With Eli Lilly and Co. set to see patents expire on its best-selling drug at year’s end, it is in the company’s interest to say its pipeline is about to produce new drugs. But the Indianapolis drugmaker may be in a position to submit five new drugs for regulatory approval this year.

Lilly will lose patent protection in western markets for the antidepressant Cymbalta at the end of 2013, which will wipe out most of that drug’s $5 billion in annual sales. That hurts because Lilly is already reeling from the late 2011 patent expirations on its antipsychotic drug Zyprexa, also a $5-billion-a-year blockbuster.

Lilly said it will submit its drug ramucirumab, for the treatment of gastric cancer, to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency this year—even before waiting for results from another Phase 3 clinical trial.

That decision surprised some analysts, who noted that ramucirumab clinical trials so far have shown that the drug extends patients’ lives for just 1.4 months, on average, even though it also extends the time they live without further progression of gastric cancer.

Goldman Sachs analyst Jami Rubin called the drug’s overall survival data “underwhelming.” And Alex Arfaei, an analyst at BMO Capital Markets, said he’s “cautious” about the prospect of the FDA's approving the drug before seeing results of a second Phase 3 trial.

Still, with Lilly testing ramucirumab, which goes by the nickname RAM, in a total of five cancers, bullish analysts think the drug could grow to more than $3 billion in annual sales.

“It is scientifically plausible that ramucirumab may show a much superior profile compared with Roche’s Avastin in breast and gastric cancer,” wrote Citigroup analyst Andrew Baum in a Jan. 30 research note.

Lilly also might submit ramucirumab for approval to treat breast cancer this year, after it sees results of yet another Phase 3 trial it has under way.

Also, Lilly hopes to submit enzastaurin, a drug designed to treat lymphoma, for market approval this year.

Referring to Lilly by its ticker symbol and speaking of the company’s net present value, Barclays Capital analyst Tony Butler wrote, “LLY’s oncology pipeline assets currently make up approximately 3-5% of total company NPV but could stand to comprise nearly 15-18% of FY20 revenues.”

The other three drugs Lilly hopes to submit for market approval this year are all aimed at Type 2 diabetes: dulaglutide, empagliflozin and a long-lasting insulin called insulin glargine.

“In 2013, we could see up to five regulatory filings,” said Derica Rice, Lilly’s chief financial officer, in a Jan. 29 conference call with analysts. Noting that Lilly has 13 drugs in Phase 3 testing and another 23 in Phase 2 testing, Rice added, “This is the most robust mid- to late-stage pipeline in our history, and it positions us to drive growth post-2014.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Doug Henning!

  2. These guy were thugs — they grew up in freaking Haughville! Smh, sigh. If the mayor needs/wants "quality" Black Hoosiers who are NOT corrupt, give me a call — I know plenty. Land bank info here - http://www.kubepharm.com/indylandbank/IndyLandBank.html

  3. Magician and illusionist!

  4. The basic idea of nice apartments with parking and retail is a good one, but this design seems overwhelmingly big/tall for Broad Ripple. The size could be disguised a bit with lots of big trees/landscaping, but the complex is too massive to blend in easily. That section of canal between College and Westfield will also need to be upgraded on both sides. Nice apartments facing onto a nice promenade with shade trees/plantings could bring together the canal towpath/Monon recreation, the outdoor seating at existing restaurants, and this project into something that upgrades the whole area. A plan for the whole stretch makes more sense than facing nice new housing onto what looks like a ditch. Is there a plan? Does the public have input? Who pays? The apartment idea seems to be reasonable, but Whole Foods is not a good idea for appropriate retail. Besides the store being physically too big, there are already Fresh Market at 54xCollege and Whole Foods in Nora for fancy groceries. Good Earth and Kroger are within walking distance of the Shell site. There are at least 7 grocery stores within a safe bike ride. Whole Foods would add nothing but traffic congestion. This design is on the right track, but there needs to be more work done to ensure that it blends in with and enhances the existing community. A project that large will set a tone for that whole part of town. It could be a real asset, but only if done right.

  5. I did not move to Zionsville to live in Carmel. This and the subsequent developments to follow will ensure a vanilla uniformity of strip malls and apartment buildings as we seek to bring our town down to the least common denominator. We were warned before recent elections that pro-development council members would make sure their friends (landowners and developers) would be able to make their millions off of the exploitation of Zionsville. Why in God's name would we sell out the best preserved small town in the State of Indiana?

ADVERTISEMENT