Lilly among bidders for Denmark company, source says

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eli Lilly and Co., Novo Nordisk A/S, and Novartis AG’S Sandoz are among bidders for Ascendis Pharma A/S of Denmark, a person with knowledge of the matter said.

The Copenhagen-based health-care company received offers of about $400 million, said the person, who declined to be identified because the process isn’t public. Ascendis may choose a final bidder by early September, the person said.

Ascendis has a technology that allows drugs to be released into the body in a controlled way over time, according to its website. The company focuses on hormone-related disorders and is developing a human growth hormone that can be taken once a week. It’s also developing new formulations of approved medicines and products for the central nervous system and infectious diseases, according to the website.

The Danish company is developing a weekly insulin shot. Novo Nordisk, also based in Copenhagen and the biggest maker of the hormone insulin, aims to introduce an insulin product in 2013 that’s taken three times weekly. Indianapolis-based Lilly has an insulin product in mid-stage trials that targets a once-daily dose for diabetes. Sandoz, the generic-drug unit of Switzerland’s Novartis, sells biosimilar medicines including a version of Pfizer Inc.’s growth hormone.

Ascendis spokeswoman Lotte Sønderbjerg declined to comment. Eric Althoff, a Novartis spokesman, didn’t immediately return a call seeking comment. A call to Mark Taylor, a Lilly spokesman, before U.S. business hours wasn’t immediately returned. Novo Nordisk had no comment, spokeswoman Katrine Sperling said.

Sanofi-Aventis SA this week said it dropped development of an experimental, long-acting insulin that wouldn’t require diabetics to receive daily injections. The Paris-based company is still seeking a successor to its existing Lantus insulin, a daily shot that generated$4.05 billion in revenue last year. Lantus is Sanofi’s best-selling medicine.

Sanofi, France’s biggest drugmaker, cut its 2010 earnings forecast this month after U.S. regulators approved a generic rival to its Lovenox blood thinner. The company is preparing a formal approach to acquire Genzyme Corp., the world’s largest maker of medicines for genetic diseases, which last week rebuffed an informal approach by Sanofi to enter talks, said people familiar with the situation.

Ascendis is owned by its management, Paris-based Sofinnova Partners, Gilde HealthCare Partners BV of Utrecht, the Netherlands, and TechnoStart of Germany.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Great article and post scripts by Mike L (Great addition to IBJ BTW). Bobby's stubborn as a mule, and doubt if he ever comes back to IU. But the love he would receive would be enormous. Hope he shows some time, but not counting on it.

  2. When the Indiana GOP was going around the State selling the Voucher bill they were promising people that the vouchers would only be for public charter schools. They lied. As usual.

  3. I am Mr. Morris Ray, a Legitimate And a Reputable money Lender. We lend funds out to individuals in need of financial assistance, we give loan to people that have a bad credit or in need of money to pay bills, to invest on business. Have you been looking for loan? you have not to worry, because you are in the right place i offer loan at low interest rate of 2% so if you are in need of a loan i want you to just contact me via this email Address: morris_ray123@outlook.com

  4. Jim, your "misleading" numbers comment is spot on. This is the spin these posers are putting on it. News flash, fans: these guys lie. They are not publicly traded so no one holds them accountable for anything they say. The TV numbers are so miniscule to begin with any "increase" produces double digit "growth" numbers. It's ridiculous to think that anything these guys have done has awakened the marketplace. What have they done? Consolidate the season so they run more races on consecutive weekends? And this creates "momentum." Is that the same momentum you enjoy when you don't race between August and March? Keep in mind that you are running teams who barely make ends meet ragged over the summer to accomplish this brilliant strategy of avoiding the NFL while you run your season finale at midnight on the East Coast. But I should not obfuscate my own point: any "ratings increase" is exactly what Jim points to - the increased availability of NBC Sports in households. Look fans, I love the sport to but these posers are running it off a cliff. Miles wants to declare victory and then run for Mayor. I could go on and on but bottom line for God's sake don't believe a word they say. Note to Anthony - try doing just a little research instead of reporting what these pretenders say and then offering an "opinion" no more informed than the average fan.

  5. If he's finally planning to do the right thing and resign, why not do it before the election? Waiting until after means what - s special election at tax payer expense? Appointment (by whom?) thus robbing the voters of their chance to choose? Does he accrue some additional financial advantage to waiting, like extra pension payments? What's in it for him? That's the question that needs to be asked.