Lilly drops inhaled-insulin project

J.K. Wall
March 7, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Eli Lilly and Co. confirmed this evening that it will abandon its inhaled insulin program, citing increased uncertainties about its commercial potential and the regulatory environment.

The decision will cost Lilly $90 million to $120 million, or from 5 to 7 cents per share. The Indianapolis-based drugmaker now expects to per-share profit of $3.73 to $3.90 this year.

Lilly's partner on inhaled insulin, Massachusetts-based Alkermes Inc., announced this morning that it expected Lilly to cancel the program next week.

Lilly will halt its worldwide Phase 3 clinical trial of inhaled insulin, which included patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Patients will be switched to other insulin therapies. Lilly will pay for those therapies for all U.S. patients, and is considering similar support for non-U.S. patients.

"This decision, though difficult, is the right one to make at this time," said John Lechleiter, Lilly's president and chief operating officer, in a written statement. He said the company conducted a "thorough review" of its inhaled insulin program over the last few months.

Lilly was one of three major drugmakers that tried to develop inhaled insulin as a more attractive alternative to standard injected insulin. Diabetic patients already spend $7 billion a year on insulin, and the worldwide prevalence of diabetes is expected to double by 2030.

But the first inhaled insulin product on the market, Pfizer Inc.'s Exubera, failed miserably. Sales never took off, as patients and doctors complained about Exubera's bulky delivery device. In October, New York-based Pfizer gave its rights to Exubera back to its development partner, Nektar Therapeutics, and took a $2.8 billion charge. It also put 600 workers at its Exubera factory in Terre Haute on paid leave.

In January, Denmark-based Novo Nordisk A/S discontinued its inhaled insulin program, a partnership with Aradigm Corp.

As recently as January, Lilly officials said they planned to submit their inhaled insulin product for regulatory approval in 2009.

One small company, California-based MannKind Corp., is still trying to develop inhaled insulin. But it has no larger company lined up to help it sell the product to doctors, if it receives regulatory approval.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The Walgreens did not get a lot of traffic. It was not located on the corner of the intersection, and not really visible from Emerson. Meanwhile the CVS there is huge and right on the corner. I am guessing a lot of people drove by a million times and never knew the Walgreens was there. Although, with the new Walmart market going in, that area could really see a lot of increase in traffic soon.

  2. You folks don't have a clue. There is a legal way to enter this country and to get aid. This left unchecked could run us to ruin quickly. I also heard that 'supporters' were getting major $$ to take them in? Who's monitoring this and guess who pays the bill? I support charitable organizations... but this is NOT the way to do it!

  3. Apparently at some time before alcohol has been served at the fair. The problem is that beer or wine used to be a common drink for people before soft drinks and was not thought to be that unusual. Since many folks now only drink to see how much they can drink or what kind of condition they can end up in it becomes more problematic. Go to Europe and its no big deal just as if you had sodas of milk to drink everyday. Its using common sense that is lacking now days.

  4. To address the epic failure of attracting race fans to both the Indy 500 and Brickyard 400 would take too much of my time to write. Bottom line Boles is clueless and obviously totally out of touch with the real paying fan base. I see nothing but death spin coming for the Brickyard, just like Indy. Get somebody in a place of power that understands what race fans want.

  5. I am a race fan through & through. It doesn't matter if it's Indy cars or Nascar. I love a great race. I go to several other tracks each year and you can see the entire track. I know Indy has tradition, but fans want to see the entire race. I sit in the Penthouse, am almost 60 years old, and would like to see a better TV screen in turn 1 so you can see the entire race. Then I think Indy needs to install an escalator so us old folks can make it up to the Penthouse and down again if we want more options to purchase food and drinks. Just a race fans opinion. Lights won't make the race any better, but you might be able to see the TV better at night. Turn 1's screen needs replaced with a better and bigger screen.