Shares fall after Lilly earnings report

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Shares of Eli Lilly and Co. fell in morning trading after the company said health reform is taking a bite out of its business.

The Indianapolis-based drugmaker also lowered its forecast for full-year profits because the new health care law grants larger rebates on prescription drugs to federal health insurance programs.

Such rebates already cost Lilly $60 million in the first quarter, even though the law was signed on March 19. Lilly expects to lose $350 million to $400 million in revenue this year and as much as $700 million next year.

Lilly stock traded as low as $36.16 Monday morning, down 1 percent, while the broader markets were up. The company released its first-quarter financial results before the markets opened.

“The U.S. health care reform clearly provides a near-term challenge,” said Derica Rice, Lilly’s chief financial officer, during a conference call Monday morning with Wall Street analysts.

That’s a problem for Lilly, which needs to build up all the cash it can before its bestselling drug Zyprexa loses sales to cheaper generic copies beginning in late 2011.

Lilly shareholders were set to gather Monday in Indianapolis to hear an update on the company’s performance, including how it will keep paying its generous dividend during the lean years after Zyprexa’s patent expiration.

Also, Lilly’s board of directors has bowed to pressure from investors in past years and is now recommending that shareholders remove a supermajority shareholder vote to approve a hostile takeover of the company.

This barrier to unwanted takeovers has been in place for 25 years. It will require the consent of 80 percent of shareholders to remove it.

In its first quarter, Lilly earned $1.25 billion, down 5 percent from the same quarter last year. On a per-share basis, Lilly’s profits shrank from $1.20 a year ago to $1.13 in this year’s first quarter.

Excluding expenses for an acquisition and severance payments as Lilly lays off employees, the company would have earned $1.18 per share in the quarter.

Lilly incurred charges of 12 cents per share from the cost of the rebates as well as an $85.1 million tax because the health reform law will reduce the tax benefit given to companies who provide prescription drug coverage to their retirees.

Lilly’s results beat the expectations of Wall Street analysts, who were expecting earnings of $1.10 per share, according to a survey by Thomson Financial Network.

Lilly’s revenue for the quarter rose 9 percent to $5.49 billion, slightly below analysts’ expectations of $5.54 billion.

“We expect that the new U.S. health care reform legislation, while not perfect, will help seniors in the Medicare system better afford their prescriptions and will provide greater access to our medicines for millions of Americans who are currently uninsured,” Lilly CEO John Lechleiter said in a statement. “However, as a result of the new legislation, Lilly will incur substantial costs to our business.”

For the year, Lilly expects the health reform law to slice 35 cents per share from its profits. Those costs forced Lilly to reduce its profit forecast to a range of $4.40-$4.55 per share. In January, Lilly predicted it would earn $4.65-$4.85 per share this year.

The company said its underlying business is performing better than expected, partially offsetting the impact of health reform. But Lilly’s international profits were tempered in the first quarter by a weaker dollar, which caused the company’s cost of sales spiked 37 percent.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If what you stated is true, then this article is entirely inaccurate. "State sells bonds" is same as "State borrows money". Supposedly the company will "pay for them". But since we are paying the company, we are still paying for this road with borrowed money, even though the state has $2 billion in the bank.

  2. Andrew hit the nail on the head. AMTRAK provides terrible service and that is why the state has found a contractor to improve the service. More trips, on-time performance, better times, cleanliness and adequate or better restrooms. WI-FI and food service will also be provided. Transit from outlying areas will also be provided. I wouldn't take it the way it is but with the above services and marketing of the service,ridership will improve and more folks will explore Indy and may even want to move here.

  3. They could take the property using eminent domain and save money by not paying the church or building a soccer field and a new driveway. Ctrwd has monthly meetings open to all customers of the district. The meetings are listed and if the customers really cared that much they would show. Ctrwd works hard in every way they can to make sure the customer is put first. Overflows damage the surrounding environment and cost a lot of money every year. There have been many upgrades done through the years to help not send flow to Carmel. Even with the upgrades ctrwd cannot always keep up. I understand how a storage tank could be an eye sore, but has anyone thought to look at other lift stations or storage tanks. Most lift stations are right in the middle of neighborhoods. Some close to schools and soccer fields, and some right in back yards, or at least next to a back yard. We all have to work together to come up with a proper solution. The proposed solution by ctrwd is the best one offered so far.

  4. Fox has comments from several people that seem to have some inside information. I would refer to their website. Changed my whole opionion of this story.

  5. This place is great! I'm piggy backing and saying the Cobb salad is great. But the ribs are awesome. $6.49 for ribs and 2 sides?! They're delicious. If you work downtown, head over there.