Lilly shares trade down after fourth-quarter profits falls

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Shares of Eli Lilly and Co. dipped in morning trading after the drugmaker reported a dip in fourth-quarter earnings and a steep dive in sales of its newest drug, Effient.

Indianapolis-based Lilly’s stock price fell as much as 3 percent at one point this morning to $35.27.

Profit dropped 10 percent to $999 million in the quarter ended Dec. 31, down from $1.12 billion in the same period a year earlier. Those totals exclude the impact of Lilly’s agreement to sell its Lafayette manufacturing plant in October 2009 and its purchase of ImClone Systems in November 2008.

On the same basis, Lilly’s fourth-quarter profit per share was 91 cents, down from $1.02 a year ago.

Wall Street analysts expected a profit of 92 cents per share, excluding the extraordinary items, according to a survey by Thomson Financial network.

Lilly’s stock price has been depressed for more than a year as investors and analysts have taken a show-me attitude about Lilly’s pipeline of experimental drugs, which the company is counting on to replace five blockbuster drugs that will lose sales to cheaper generics starting this year and running to 2014.

Effient, a blood thinner Lilly launched in late summer, was supposed to fill a large chunk of the multibillion-dollar gap those drugs will leave. But in the fourth quarter, the drug’s worldwide sales went from bad to worse.

Lilly and its partner, Japan-based Daichii Sankyo Co. Ltd., sold just $3.8 million of Effient in the fourth quarter, down from $22.6 million in the third quarter.

"For all the attention this product has received over the past few years, the first six months of sales are very underwhelming," Bernstein analyst Dr. Tim Anderson said in a Thursday morning research note, according to the Associated Press.

Lilly officials have pleaded for patience for Effient, saying the first step has been to get Effient on the approved formularies of U.S. health insurers and European national health programs.

“Even considering all of that, I would think you would be disappointed to the early results of the product,” Catherine Arnold, a Credit Suisse analyst, said during a conference call with Lilly executives this morning.

Goldman Sachs analyst Jami Rubin asked Lilly CEO John Lechleiter when Lilly would “reset expectations” for Effient.

But Lechleiter said Lilly remains confident the drug will turn out to be a success.

“We feel just as good about Effient today as we did when we launched the product,” Lechleiter responded. He added, “I’m very reluctant to say after six months we can say this or we can say that. We’re going to stay with it.”

In prepared remarks, Lechleiter highlighted Lilly’s performance for all of 2009, during which Lilly’s profits rose 16 percent to $4.85 billion, or $4.42 per share.

For 2010, Lilly reaffirmed its profit forecast of $4.65 to $4.85 per share.

In the fourth quarter, Lilly’s sales rose by 14 percent to $5.9 billion. The growth was driven mainly by higher prices in the United States and by higher volume in the rest of the world.

Its cancer drug Alimta continued to be the fastest-growing product, with fourth-quarter sales rising 64 percent to $523.6 million.

Excluding the impact of Lilly’s extraordinary events, the company would have earned a profit of $915.4 million, or 83 cents per share. In the fourth quarter a year ago, Lilly recorded a loss of $3.6 billion, or $3.31 per share.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1