IBJNews

Local building permits down again in August

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

New home construction in the nine-county metropolitan area fell for the third consecutive month in August.

The number of building permits filed locally dropped by 18 percent last month from the same time a year ago, falling from 354 to 290, according to figures from the Builders Association of Greater Indianapolis.

Sixty-six permits were filed in Marion County in August, down slightly from 67 in the same month last year and up from 46 last month. Hamilton County fared much worse, however. It saw a 29-percent decline in permits filed, from 139 in August 2009 to 98 last month.

The negative trend in local building permits started in June, when the number filed fell by 20 percent from the same month a year ago. July posted a 13-percent decline in permits.

But the two months previous weren’t much better. April was flat and May saw an increase of just 2 percent from the same month in 2009.

Generous federal tax credits that expired at the end of April likely led to the drop in permit filings.

Large increases in the number of building permits filed the first three months of the year have helped the nine-county area to outpace last year's pace through the first eight months of 2010. Through August, 2,733 permits had been filed, an 11-percent increase from the same time last year.

Nationally, home construction increased last month and applications for building permits also grew. But the gains were driven mainly by apartment and condominium construction, not the much larger single-family homes sector.

Nationally, construction of new homes and apartments rose 10.5 percent in August from a month earlier, to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 598,000, the Commerce Department said Tuesday. That's the highest level since April.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT