IBJNews

CICF lost more than its foundation peers in '08

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The $491 million Central Indiana Community Foundation has switched investment advisers after the market crash of 2008, a year in which it saw greater losses than many of its peers.

CICF, one of the largest community foundations in the country, lost 31 percent of its assets in 2008. That was more than the 27-percent median loss among all community foundations, according to a recently released survey by the Council on Foundations, based in Arlington, Va.

“We could’ve done a little better, yes, definitely,” CICF investment analyst Belinda Scholl said.

Each percentage point gained or lost translates to millions in grant-making ability. CICF awarded $40.3 million to various charities in 2008. CICF encompasses the Indianapolis Foundation serving Marion County and the Legacy Fund serving Hamilton County, as well as administering several donor-advised funds. 

To avoid a drastic drop in grant-making this year, CICF leaders adopted a new spending policy for endowment funds held on behalf of charitable organizations. Not all organizations opted to follow the change, which called for spending 7 percent instead of 5 percent of average assets in 2009. Community endowments, the Indianapolis Foundation and Legacy Fund, increased their spending policy from 5 percent to 5.5 percent.

CICF’s joint investment board also started shopping for a new consultant and began using Boston-based Cambridge Associates in September. The foundation let go of Cincinnati-based Fund Evaluation Group LLC after 16 years. CICF had begun considering hiring a new investment consultant before the 2008 market decline.

“Fund Evaluation Group has served us very well,” Scholl said. “Because we have grown, our portfolio has grown.”

Cambridge, headquartered in Boston, employs more specialist money managers and was chosen partly for its expertise in evaluating alternative investments, which include hedge funds, Scholl said.

CICF will pay more for money management advice because Cambridge takes a percentage of assets. The total cost in the first year will be about $240,000, versus $225,000 for Fund Evaluation Group.

The local foundation is not much different from its peers in moving heavily into alternative investments. The Council on Foundations reports that 20 percent of all community foundation assets were in alternatives in 2008, the highest level in the survey’s history. The survey included 200 community foundations, including several in Indiana.

CICF had 12 percent in hedge funds and 11 percent in real assets with intentions to increase both types of investment.

Under Cambridge, there’s no plan to abandon alternatives, but CICF will use more flexible asset-allocation targets, Scholl said. 

Although CICF's assets fell 31.1 percent, to $480 million, in 2008, they have risen about 18 percent so far in 2009, Scholl said. 

Many foundation trustees will see their assets begin to recover and breath a sigh of relief. Carmel money manager Greg Hahn, principal of Winthrop Capital Management, believes they need to do more to avoid a repeat performance. “This is really a break-down in risk management,” he said. “Asset allocation–some consultants and advisers believe that is risk management.”

Hahn, who sits on the Indiana State Teachers Retirement Fund board, said that over time, foundations have abandoned principal-preservation mechanisms in favor of maintaining overly high spending. “A lot of foundations have to back off and say 'We’re disciplined, and we’re ready to change our spending policy,'” he said.

Even on a long-term basis, community foundations aren’t maintaining “purchasing power,” the Council on Foundations noted. The median 20-year return in the survey was 7.9 percent. (CICF, which has existed since 1997, reports a 10-year return of 4.6 percent.)

With average inflation of 2.8 percent, and typical spending policies of 5.5 percent, community foundations are outstripping their 20-year return by 0.4 percent.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • This is news?
    This story has be up for a day and no comments? Not surprising since it isn't exactly a newsflash that investments were down significantly in 2008. Performance was off, so CICF made a change in managers. Again, where is the news? Does the IBJ typically report when a firm changes vendors? KM, instead of this story, how about going after something with a little meat on the bone, such as CICF's focus on the long-term investment horizon, with little focus on short-term cash needs for grantmaking and on-going operations? Oh, I know why. That doesn't increase subscribers or click-through rates.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

  2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

  3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

  4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

  5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.

ADVERTISEMENT