CICF lost more than its foundation peers in '08

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The $491 million Central Indiana Community Foundation has switched investment advisers after the market crash of 2008, a year in which it saw greater losses than many of its peers.

CICF, one of the largest community foundations in the country, lost 31 percent of its assets in 2008. That was more than the 27-percent median loss among all community foundations, according to a recently released survey by the Council on Foundations, based in Arlington, Va.

“We could’ve done a little better, yes, definitely,” CICF investment analyst Belinda Scholl said.

Each percentage point gained or lost translates to millions in grant-making ability. CICF awarded $40.3 million to various charities in 2008. CICF encompasses the Indianapolis Foundation serving Marion County and the Legacy Fund serving Hamilton County, as well as administering several donor-advised funds. 

To avoid a drastic drop in grant-making this year, CICF leaders adopted a new spending policy for endowment funds held on behalf of charitable organizations. Not all organizations opted to follow the change, which called for spending 7 percent instead of 5 percent of average assets in 2009. Community endowments, the Indianapolis Foundation and Legacy Fund, increased their spending policy from 5 percent to 5.5 percent.

CICF’s joint investment board also started shopping for a new consultant and began using Boston-based Cambridge Associates in September. The foundation let go of Cincinnati-based Fund Evaluation Group LLC after 16 years. CICF had begun considering hiring a new investment consultant before the 2008 market decline.

“Fund Evaluation Group has served us very well,” Scholl said. “Because we have grown, our portfolio has grown.”

Cambridge, headquartered in Boston, employs more specialist money managers and was chosen partly for its expertise in evaluating alternative investments, which include hedge funds, Scholl said.

CICF will pay more for money management advice because Cambridge takes a percentage of assets. The total cost in the first year will be about $240,000, versus $225,000 for Fund Evaluation Group.

The local foundation is not much different from its peers in moving heavily into alternative investments. The Council on Foundations reports that 20 percent of all community foundation assets were in alternatives in 2008, the highest level in the survey’s history. The survey included 200 community foundations, including several in Indiana.

CICF had 12 percent in hedge funds and 11 percent in real assets with intentions to increase both types of investment.

Under Cambridge, there’s no plan to abandon alternatives, but CICF will use more flexible asset-allocation targets, Scholl said. 

Although CICF's assets fell 31.1 percent, to $480 million, in 2008, they have risen about 18 percent so far in 2009, Scholl said. 

Many foundation trustees will see their assets begin to recover and breath a sigh of relief. Carmel money manager Greg Hahn, principal of Winthrop Capital Management, believes they need to do more to avoid a repeat performance. “This is really a break-down in risk management,” he said. “Asset allocation–some consultants and advisers believe that is risk management.”

Hahn, who sits on the Indiana State Teachers Retirement Fund board, said that over time, foundations have abandoned principal-preservation mechanisms in favor of maintaining overly high spending. “A lot of foundations have to back off and say 'We’re disciplined, and we’re ready to change our spending policy,'” he said.

Even on a long-term basis, community foundations aren’t maintaining “purchasing power,” the Council on Foundations noted. The median 20-year return in the survey was 7.9 percent. (CICF, which has existed since 1997, reports a 10-year return of 4.6 percent.)

With average inflation of 2.8 percent, and typical spending policies of 5.5 percent, community foundations are outstripping their 20-year return by 0.4 percent.


  • This is news?
    This story has be up for a day and no comments? Not surprising since it isn't exactly a newsflash that investments were down significantly in 2008. Performance was off, so CICF made a change in managers. Again, where is the news? Does the IBJ typically report when a firm changes vendors? KM, instead of this story, how about going after something with a little meat on the bone, such as CICF's focus on the long-term investment horizon, with little focus on short-term cash needs for grantmaking and on-going operations? Oh, I know why. That doesn't increase subscribers or click-through rates.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.