IBJNews

Local lenders support small-biz loan initiative

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Small-business lenders in Indiana are supporting a proposal announced by President Obama that would increase the size of government-backed loans.

Under the plan announced Wednesday, loan amounts made through the U.S. Small Business Administration’s flagship 504 and 7(a) programs would increase to $5 million. Current maximums are $4 million for 504 loans and $2 million for 7(a) lending.

The initiative would be funded by the Troubled Asset Relief Program and would need to be approved by federal lawmakers.

“I think that increasing the caps on SBA lending is absolutely the way to go,” said Joe DeHaven, president and CEO of the Indiana Bankers Association. “It’s the correct way to spur small-business loans.”

The credit crunch has severely slowed lending activity, although most bankers contend that capital remains available to clients with a solid credit history. Still, the number of SBA-backed loans in Indiana dropped nearly 30 percent in fiscal 2009 from the previous year.

For the fiscal year ended Sept. 30, 1,035 loans totaling $266.8 million were made through the two SBA programs. That compares with 1,460 loans totaling $307 million in the previous fiscal year.

“We’re still cautious, but I think we are lending to credit-worthy borrowers,” said Scott Burns, vice president of SBA lending at the Indianapolis office of Pittsburgh-based PNC Financial Services Inc. “And you’ll see [lending] starting to step up over the next year.”

Burns thinks Indiana’s large manufacturing base could benefit most from the proposed increase, because a mid-size factory can’t purchase a lot of equipment with a $2 million loan.

The Washington, D.C.-based Independent Community Bankers of America issued a statement supporting the proposal, as did the National Association of Development Companies.

NADCO is the trade association for the nation’s certified development companies that make 504 loans. Jean Wojtowicz, director of the Indiana Statewide Certified Development Corp. in Indianapolis, is chairwoman of Virginia-based NADCO.

“Raising the ceiling on SBA 504 loans to $5 million is a big step toward bringing more job-creation money to Main Street,” Wojtowicz said.

504 loans typically are used to purchase land, buildings and equipment.

The SBA currently guarantees as much as 90 percent of loans it backs through approved financial institutions. The guarantee provides an incentive for banks to lend to small businesses that are more at risk of defaulting.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT