IBJNews

Local tooling manufacturer acquired by private-equity firm

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Techniks Inc., a designer and distributor of industrial cutting tools, has been acquired by New York private equity firm Tenex Capital Management.

Terms of the acquisition, completed Jan. 14, were not disclosed.

Tenex immediately merged Techniks with another of its portfolio companies, Jasper-based tooling supplier Nap Gladu, to create a new holding company, Quintec. Both Techniks and Nap Gladu will operate separately within Quintec, Tenex said.

Tenex has $425 million in capital and typically makes acquisitions averaging from $25 million to $50 million.

Techniks has 48 employees and brings in about $30 million in annual revenue.

Nap Gladu has more than 400 employees at 12 manufacturing and service sites in the United States and Canada. The combined company will have more than $88 million in revenue.

The combination of Techniks and Nap Gladu creates a tooling company serving customers in the cutting and machining metal, wood, plastics and composites industries throughout North America, Tenex said.

Nick Tuttle and John Stagge, who co-founded Techniks in 1996 and sold the company to Tenex, will assume new roles as co-presidents at Techniks.

Tuttle said Quintec will be headquartered at Techniks' offices at 9930 E. 56th St. and as many as 10 more employees could be hired.

Techniks was advised by the Indianapolis office of investment banking firm Navidar Group and local law firm Ice Miller LLP.





 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT