IBJNews

Longtime editorial director to leave Emmis Publishing

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Veteran Indianapolis Monthly chief Deborah Paul is easing into retirement, leaving her full-time gig as editorial director of Emmis Publishing to work as a consultant.

In a letter to colleagues, Paul said Tuesday she is scaling back her role effective April 1. Over the next year, she will hand the publishing division reins to Los Angeles magazine Editor-in-Chief Mary Melton, who will retain that job and add Paul's responsibilities.

Paul, 64, has been at Indianapolis Monthly for three decades, including the 23 years it has been part of locally based Emmis Communications Corp.

She served as managing editor and editor in chief before ascending to her current position overseeing Emmis’ stable of city and regional publications. Born in Indianapolis, Paul was associate editor at IBJ before joining the magazine.

Her letter said Paul will work part-time as a consultant, retaining some of her editorial duties during the transition period.

Indianapolis Monthly is undergoing its own leadership change following the abrupt departure of Editor David Zivan, who left last month for undisclosed reasons. Amanda Heckert, a senior editor at Atlanta magazine, has been tapped to replace him.

With circulation of about 41,000, Indianapolis Monthly is one of six such magazines published by Emmis. The others are Texas Monthly, Los Angeles, Atlanta, Cincinnati and Orange Coast.

“The publishing division is in excellent condition, and we’re proud of the great teams we have in place in all of our markets,” Paul said in her note.

Emmis’ publishing revenue increased 5.6 percent in its most recent quarter despite a drop in radio revenue. Overall, the company reported a profit of $110.9 million in the three months ended Nov. 30, a period that included one-time revenue from the sale of three of its radio stations.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT