IBJOpinion

LOPRESTI: ABA Pacers, bound by championships, wait for next one

February 8, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

mike lopresti sportsThey watch from the other side of turning 60, the old Indiana Pacers keeping track of the young Indiana Pacers, and seeing something of themselves.

The young Pacers long to make history. The old Pacers own history.

Mel Daniels, Darnell Hillman and George McGinnis played for the 1973 Pacers team that brought a third ABA championship to Indianapolis. It’s 41 years later, and no professional basketball team has done that since. A drought to cross centuries and generations.

“I would have bet my life,” McGinnis said, “that the Pacers would have somehow found a way to get a championship in those 40 years.”

But the new bunch is drawing high praise. So what are the old Pacers thinking?

Daniels: “I think we set the table. Now we’re the old guys waiting for the young guys to come to the table and do what we did, and expand on it. We’re like the daddies and we want to see the sons come to the forefront. I think it’s coming.”

Hillman, as a member of the front office: “That’s one of the reasons I’m working for the Pacers. I want that last ring.”

The 1973 team won a turbulent seven-game final series with the Kentucky Colonels, taking Game 7 in Louisville. Daniels’ recollection of that day includes how tipoff neared with no sign of star Roger Brown, who was driving to the game himself.

“Roger was late. It was a madhouse. He drove a pink Cadillac and was wearing a pink suit and he comes in, and Slick [Coach Bobby Leonard] does his threatening thing. But Roger told him, ‘Don’t worry, we’ve got this.’

“We won the game, he took a shower, got back in his pink Cadillac, and left.”

Forty-one years later, they look at a hot, young team and it all comes back. The Pacers of now seem to have a chemistry that keeps them safe from division and harm. The Pacers of then were held together by Super Glue.

“Our camaraderie was one of our key strengths,” Hillman said. “It’s really fun to see that with these guys. This team has brought back some of the memories I have.”

Same for McGinnis, MVP of the 1973 finals. “I think we spent 70 percent of our time off the court doing things together. From what I’ve read, these guys do things like always showing up for someone’s birthday. … I think it indicates they like each other, and that’s not easy in professional sports.

“The Pacers have been through a lot. The city fell in love with a group, with Reggie, and then had that awful incident at the Palace. It’s taken a lot to get the fan base back, but this group has really made a huge difference, not only from the type of basketball they play but the type of people they are. I think they’ve really touched a nerve. I got so tired before of everywhere I went, it was, ‘Thug this and thug that.’ … But now these are truly good guys, and people seem to like them. And it’s their time.”

Is it? The first half of the season was glorious. But it was the first half.

“After the All-Star break, this team will face a little more of a challenge,” Daniels said, “and it depends on how well they attack that challenge. They’re the target now.

“I love David West. I think he’s a professional and a leader. I like Paul George’s athleticism. I like the rhythm of the team. I wish Roy [Hibbert] would do more in the middle, but it takes time for a big guy to get into it.’

McGinnis: “The way they’re playing, they’re probably going to have the best record in the league. In my mind, I think they’re the best team, and I think Miami knows that and I think San Antonio knows it and Oklahoma City knows it.”

And the addition of Andrew Bynum?

Hillman: “I’m going to hold my comments on that. The jury’s still out.”

McGinnis: “I guess it depends on if he wants to play. Being on this type of team might make a difference for him.”

They still see one another often, their togetherness not dulled by time. They are eager to find out what happens in 2014, while never forgetting what happened in 1973.

Hillman: “It’s a proud and honorable moment for me when I walk out there and see those banners. Being that [a championship] hasn’t happened, people ask, ‘How far do you go back?’ You go all the way back to ’73, and there we are.”

McGinnis: “When you accomplish something, as you get older, you get sentimental about it. The lies get a little bit bigger. What you have is your memories, and they’re awfully important.”

Thus, the generation gap. The young Pacers are trying to make championship memories. The old Pacers already have them to cherish.

“We’re the Indiana Pacers, and that will never, ever change in life,” Daniels said. “Because we started the book.”•

__________

Lopresti is a lifelong resident of Richmond and a graduate of Ball State University. He was a columnist for USA Today and Gannett newspapers for 31 years; he covered 34 Final Fours, 30 Super Bowls, 32 World Series and 16 Olympics. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at mlopresti@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Nice Article
    Well written Mike...the comment the Pacers are a target now is spot in...they haven't come to a full realization of that fact yet (see last nights game as an example, how does Dallas lose by 25 to Charlotte one night and then beat Indiana the next? Because Indiana has become the "gold" standard), and to finish with the best record, which would be a great help, they are going to have to realize they are going to get everyone's best. Kudos to the 73 Pacers you interviewed...I remember that year, and the other championship seasons, with great fondness, and I hope to see the Pacers add an NBA championship banner this season. Would love to have seen Roger Brown in that pink suit...what a player that guy was...For anyone who wants to read about the glory days of the ABA, I recommend Terry Pluto's fine book, "Loose Balls", a wonderful homage to the ABA told mosttly by the players, GM's, Coaches, etc. who lived it. Thanks for the stroll down memory lane Mike!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Cramer agrees...says don't buy it and sell it if you own it! Their "pay to play" cost is this issue. As long as they charge customers, they never will attain the critical mass needed to be a successful on company...Jim Cramer quote.

  2. My responses to some of the comments would include the following: 1. Our offer which included the forgiveness of debt (this is an immediate forgiveness and is not "spread over many years")represents debt that due to a reduction of interest rates in the economy arguably represents consideration together with the cash component of our offer that exceeds the $2.1 million apparently offered by another party. 2. The previous $2.1 million cash offer that was turned down by the CRC would have netted the CRC substantially less than $2.1 million. As a result even in hindsight the CRC was wise in turning down that offer. 3. With regard to "concerned Carmelite's" discussion of the previous financing Pedcor gave up $16.5 million in City debt in addition to the conveyance of the garage (appraised at $13 million)in exchange for the $22.5 million cash and debt obligations. The local media never discussed the $16.5 million in debt that we gave up which would show that we gave $29.5 million in value for the $23.5 million. 4.Pedcor would have been much happier if Brian was still operating his Deli and only made this offer as we believe that we can redevelop the building into something that will be better for the City and City Center where both Pedcor the citizens of Carmel have a large investment. Bruce Cordingley, President, Pedcor

  3. I've been looking for news on Corner Bakery, too, but there doesn't seem to be any info out there. I prefer them over Panera and Paradise so can't wait to see where they'll be!

  4. WGN actually is two channels: 1. WGN Chicago, seen only in Chicago (and parts of Canada) - this station is one of the flagship CW affiliates. 2. WGN America - a nationwide cable channel that doesn't carry any CW programming, and doesn't have local affiliates. (In addition, as WGN is owned by Tribune, just like WTTV, WTTK, and WXIN, I can't imagine they would do anything to help WISH.) In Indianapolis, CW programming is already seen on WTTV 4 and WTTK 29, and when CBS takes over those stations' main channels, the CW will move to a sub channel, such as 4.2 or 4.3 and 29.2 or 29.3. TBS is only a cable channel these days and does not affiliate with local stations. WISH could move the MyNetwork affiliation from WNDY 23 to WISH 8, but I am beginning to think they may prefer to put together their own lineup of syndicated programming instead. While much of it would be "reruns" from broadcast or cable, that's pretty much what the MyNetwork does these days anyway. So since WISH has the choice, they may want to customize their lineup by choosing programs that they feel will garner better ratings in this market.

  5. The Pedcor debt is from the CRC paying ~$23M for the Pedcor's parking garage at City Center that is apprased at $13M. Why did we pay over the top money for a private businesses parking? What did we get out of it? Pedcor got free parking for their apartment and business tenants. Pedcor now gets another building for free that taxpayers have ~$3M tied up in. This is NOT a win win for taxpayers. It is just a win for Pedcor who contributes heavily to the Friends of Jim Brainard. The campaign reports are on the Hamilton County website. http://www2.hamiltoncounty.in.gov/publicdocs/Campaign%20Finance%20Images/defaultfiles.asp?ARG1=Campaign Finance Images&ARG2=/Brainard, Jim

ADVERTISEMENT