LOU'S VIEWS: A little something new on the Prairie

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry

I’ve been taking my kids and their pals to Conner Prairie for 15 years. But the most recent visit was the first time they wanted to spend the whole time in Prairietown.

Kids I’ve taken on the Conner Prairie time trip have almost always enjoyed the settlement and its blacksmith shop, general store, and stilt-walking/wheel-rolling games. But after two hours, they were ready to move to another area.

ae-farmhand-15col.jpg Character cards give visitors specific tasks to complete at Prairietown. (Photos Courtesy Conner Prairie)

But times have changed—even at Conner Prairie, where time stands still. The brains behind Prairietown have introduced new ways to explore, enjoy and interact.

Before I get to the specifics, let’s look at this from the perspective of an 8-, 9- or 10-year-old. Some kids in that age range are bursting with curiosity and ready to fire off a question to the Prairietown schoolteacher or innkeeper without hesitation. Most kids, though, are a bit more reserved in this situation. And as children get more hesitant, parents tend to get more impatient, wondering why their progeny suddenly seems so shy.

In the newfangled version of Conner Prairie, you can still do things the old-fashioned, free-associative way. But kids can also spin a wheel and take on the role of a cook, a craftsman, a gardener or other character—from a sophisticate to a criminal. The character card associated with each of these is printed with a series of missions the character must complete. A hunter, for instance, had to make a deal for a rifle. A criminal had to try to find someone who would agree to go fishing on Sunday.

Completed tasks earn a stamp that upgrades the child to another level. Kids can now collect coins for performing different tasks around the town. On our visit, my son and a friend used those coins—plus additional acquired paper money (I didn’t ask)—to participate in a land auction. Soon they were pooling resources with a group of young girls to buy a parcel of prime real estate. Once the land was acquired, a healthy debate ensued over whose name should be on the deed. Voila: full engagement.

Participating in this way did not preclude more casual involvement. Shortly after completing the last tasks on their cards, the boys spotted a sort-of-baseball and a sort-of-bat sitting in a field near a makeshift home plate. It took only a few pitches and swings before a group of costumed townspeople joined them for a game of Rounders (First rule of Rounders: You run clockwise around the bases). Soon, other kids were lining up to play—even those who weren’t landowners like my hunter son and his criminal pal.

I’m sorry. Did I say they wanted to spend the whole time in Prairietown? Well, not exactly; they couldn’t resist the lure of the hatchet-throwing competition in the Native American village. And who can blame them?

“Next Fall,” the dramatic romance being staged at the Phoenix Theatre through July 8, gets strong lead performances from Scot Greenwell and John Goodson as a couple whose age difference doesn’t cause nearly as many problems as their religious

differences—which become more serious after one is involved in a car crash. It has the guts to create a range of characters with strong beliefs and explore the seemingly contradictory nature of gay fundamentalist Christians. And it has a big heart and an open mind.

It also has a script that contains little or no surprise, a few too many forced situations (including a sitcom-like scene where a father visits the apartment of his closeted son unannounced), a clunky set that drains some of the drama, and between-scenes music that seems to come from a Saturday Night Live soap-opera parody.

Those elements—and a resistance to pushing its subject matter into too-uncomfortable territory—don’t make it a bad play, just a not particularly enlightening one.

Using the material of one of the 20th-century’s greatest songwriters (one who happens to be a native Hoosier) as fodder for an evening of dance may seem like a no-brainer for a modern dance company.

But there are hidden challenges in the material, the largest of which is that many of these numbers are branded by other forms of dance. Try to picture anything but crazed tap dancing accompanying “Anything Goes,” for instance.

In “Cole!,” its season-closing production at the Indiana Repertory Theatre, Dance Kaleidoscope wisely didn’t bother competing with its iconic stage and screen predecessors. Instead, it made its own amiable way through the Cole Porter catalog, briskly offering 16 numbers sans showstoppers but also free of duds.

The first act respectfully used early versions of Porter recordings. The thin sounds seemed to have had an effect on the dancers, who didn’t pop as well as they did in the second half, which featured a more modern sound (the likes of David Byrne and The Thompson Twins are mixed with Sinatra, Armstrong and Fitzgerald).

There was a disconnect between the lyrics and the choreography for “Miss Otis Regrets,” but the number stood out as a crowd-pleaser. As did the Act 1 closer to a choral “Wunderbar.”

In the midst of the playful spirit of the show, Liberty Harris danced a moving solo to Annie Lennox’s version of “Ev’ry Time We Say Goodbye,” made more powerful by the combo of lighting and choreography that boldly left her face largely hidden. And Brandon Comer and Timothy June’s “It’s All Right With Me” was an appropriate pairing for Pride Week.

Much of the spotlight in the show seemed to be on Comer, a second-year DK dancer poised to fill the space left by last season’s departures, Kenoth Shane Patton and George Salinas. In a Q&A during intermission (a plus during DK’s Thursday evening shows), Artistic Director David Hochoy responded to a question about Patton, pointing out that the life of a dance company comes from retiring dancers’ making room for new ones (I’m paraphrasing). He noted that more than 60 dancers have come through the company since he took over 21 years ago.

That’s a remarkable legacy. One of the pleasures of a resident company—of which DK is a rare breed in this town—is seeing it evolve, constantly morphing.

One of the reasons we love sports so much is that we care about the players. A resident arts company can invoke the same loyalty while, in essence, creating its own long-form dance piece.

Within that, some games are forgettable. Some are spectacular. Others are just entertaining.•


This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. to mention the rest of Molly's experience- she served as Communications Director for the Indianapolis Department of Public Works and also did communications for the state. She's incredibly qualified for this role and has a real love for Indianapolis and Indiana. Best of luck to her!

  2. Shall we not demand the same scrutiny for law schools, med schools, heaven forbid, business schools, etc.? How many law school grads are servers? How many business start ups fail and how many business grads get low paying jobs because there are so few high paying positions available? Why does our legislature continue to demean public schools and give taxpayer dollars to charters and private schools, ($171 million last year), rather than investing in our community schools? We are on a course of disaster regarding our public school attitudes unless we change our thinking in a short time.

  3. I agree with the other reader's comment about the chunky tomato soup. I found myself wanting a breadstick to dip into it. It tasted more like a marinara sauce; I couldn't eat it as a soup. In general, I liked the place... but doubt that I'll frequent it once the novelty wears off.

  4. The Indiana toll road used to have some of the cleanest bathrooms you could find on the road. After the lease they went downhill quickly. While not the grossest you'll see, they hover a bit below average. Am not sure if this is indicative of the entire deal or merely a portion of it. But the goals of anyone taking over the lease will always be at odds. The fewer repairs they make, the more money they earn since they have a virtual monopoly on travel from Cleveland to Chicago. So they only comply to satisfy the rules. It's hard to hand public works over to private enterprise. The incentives are misaligned. In true competition, you'd have multiple roads, each build by different companies motivated to make theirs more attractive. Working to attract customers is very different than working to maximize profit on people who have no choice but to choose your road. Of course, we all know two roads would be even more ridiculous.

  5. The State is in a perfect position. The consortium overpaid for leasing the toll road. Good for the State. The money they paid is being used across the State to upgrade roads and bridges and employ people at at time most of the country is scrambling to fund basic repairs. Good for the State. Indiana taxpayers are no longer subsidizing the toll roads to the tune of millions a year as we had for the last 20 years because the legislature did not have the guts to raise tolls. Good for the State. If the consortium fails, they either find another operator, acceptable to the State, to buy them out or the road gets turned back over to the State and we keep the Billions. Good for the State. Pat Bauer is no longer the Majority or Minority Leader of the House. Good for the State. Anyway you look at this, the State received billions of dollars for an assett the taxpayers were subsidizing, the State does not have to pay to maintain the road for 70 years. I am having trouble seeing the downside.