IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEWS: Gregory Hancock's 'Hunchback' is back

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry

The last time I saw Gregory Hancock Dance Theatre’s “The Hunchback of Notre Dame” (which returned for a June 29-30 run at the Tarkington), I wrote in praise of Ryan Koharchik’s lighting design and the costumes by Hancock.

But I took issue with the music. The score came from both the French- and English-language versions of “Notre Dame de Paris,” a 1998 stage musical also taken from Victor Hugo’s novel. Rather than enhance the work, I felt it tied chains to an otherwise strong production.
 

ae-hunchbackprint-1col.jpg Martin Casanova and Christine Thacker play Quasimodo and his beloved Esmeralda in Gregory Hancock’s take on “The Hunchback of Notre Dame.” (Photo courtesy of Gregory Hancock Dance Theatre)

“Co-opting the score from someone else’s interpretation,” I wrote, gives an unfortunate secondhand, derivative quality to Hancock’s vision. “It’s a shame, since his varied, subtle and, when necessary, explosively big choreography deserved better.”

The bombastic, histrionic music still adds a “Les Mis”-like gravitas to the proceedings. And the often trite and repetitive lyrics still rob Hancock’s talented dancers of the opportunity to set the emotional tone. But this time around, the performance space at the Tarkington proved much more conducive to Hancock’s vision, with terrific site lines and smart use of minimal set pieces. (This was my first time seeing the company in the Tarkington and the marriage seems to be working, at least on stage.) The ensemble is sharper, too, and the overall impact strengthened.

As Quasimodo, Martin Casanova has deepened in a role that he had already mastered five years ago. Still heartbreaking, he now seems to have matured as a

performer, accepting his place in an ensemble show. Subtle choices add to richer emotions. Aided by Hancock’s choreography, Casanova finds a remarkable balance of twisted body and soaring spirit without making the music’s mistake of overplaying.

The role of Esmeralda seems to have grown on guest artist Christine Thacker, too, who also played the part in her farewell performance as a company member in 2007. Here, she’s powerful and passionate and youthful and conflicted for most of the show. In death, she’s far more than a lifeless rag doll, giving the potentially morbid duet a virtuosity that never gets in the way of its humanity.
____________

Next week, I’ll be offering a critical guide to the best of the Indianapolis International Film Festival. Amid all the independent, foreign and documentary feature screenings, though, I thought I’d take a break and see something completely different—a big Hollywood film at the multiplex.

Unfortunately, that film was “The Amazing Spider-Man,” a film so overpacked with coincidences and writer-rigged plotting that I didn’t believe a second of it and was bugged by most of it.

The fact that Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone are good actors make the film they are stuck in even more annoying.

Trust me, I have no trouble buying a web-shooting super hero (I bought “The Avengers” hook, line and sinker). I neither worshipped nor minded the ”Spider-Man” made 10 years ago, so I had no agenda. And I’m not one of those critics objecting to unnecessary remakes. For one, little that Hollywood does is necessary. And for another, remakes are part of the game: Frederic March won an Oscar for “Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde” only about a decade after John Barrymore made his film version.

What I have trouble with is “Oh, come on” moments at nearly every plot turn. Specifically:

I have trouble buying a high school student getting a position of great responsibility in a high-tech, experiment-heavy company. Even if she is played by Emma Stone and looks well into her 20s.

I have trouble with the fact that said company barely has a security system or even video cameras monitoring its experiments, allowing Peter Parker to basically waltz in. The White House during the Garfield administration had tighter security.

And while I’m nit-picking, I have trouble with the fact that, right in the middle of the high-tech lab, there’s a loud three-dimensional display to aid tour groups in explaining the wonders of the company’s experiments. And, in the massive lobby, an even louder voice spouts company PR. What is this company? Distractions Unlimited?

Even with bullying stories in the news, I have trouble believing a high school kid can have the crap beat out of him in front of an entire student body without anyone saying anything or his family pressing charges.

I have trouble with a giant lizard attack witnessed by hundreds of people—some of whom had vehicles thrown off a bridge—being reported in the press as a rumor.

I have trouble with unlocked New York City windows that can be accessed via fire escapes.

I have trouble with time bombs that not only have conveniently visible numeric displays but also a helpful voice to tell you how close to your doom you are.

And I’m tired of writers relying on Emma Stone’s hesitant charms to carry scenes.

“The Amazing Spider-Man” is like radio commentators who are concerned only with the impact of what they are saying right now, regardless of whether it makes any sense or connects to what happened moments ago or what happens next.

All of which wouldn’t be so much of a problem if “The Amazing Spider-Man” were fun and/or original. 

Now where’s Batman?•

__________

This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • opinion
    Having attended the GHDT production of Hunchback of Notre Dame on June 29, I must respectfully disagree with Mr. Harry's review. I had never seen Hunchback in any venue, so was excitedly looking forward to experiencing it for the first time. It was a spectacular production, enhanced by the brilliant choreography of Mr. Hancock, the talent of the entire cast, and the moving, haunting, beautiful music. Often in theatre, one experiences a performance which captures one's heart. Rarely is one privileged enough to experience a performance that touches the soul and remains there forever. This was indeed the case on this occasion. I was thrilled to return to enjoy Saturday night's closing performance! I also just purchased the music from Notre Dame de Paris, which will enable me to replay this magnificant ballet again and again in my mind. Interestingly, on line there were video exerpts of the French production, but without Mr. Hancock's breathtaking choreography and vision, the musical seemed lackluster. I am sad that you were not able to appreciate this shining gem. To the entire cast of this wonderful masterpiece I say "BRAVO"!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT