IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEWS: On heroes and villains

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry

My intention this week was to write about superheroes—comic-book characters with capes and cowls and webs and wonders who make the world safer for the rest of us.

It has been, cinematically, a summer with an abundance of them—with the big-screen releases of “The Avengers,” “The Amazing Spider-Man” and “The Dark Knight Rises” topping box office charts and expanding the fan base well beyond their core fans. Earlier this month, I was a guest speaker at a science fiction and fantasy convention where superheroes were a prime subject of conversation (along with the upcoming zombie apocalypse, of course).

But the subject of superheroes isn’t as playful as it was just a few days ago.

The mass murder in Colorado at a midnight screening of “The Dark Knight Rises” made sure of that. Even though the accused killer has been arrested, there’s a feeling, as I write this, that the world isn’t as safe as it was.

That seems to be the case whenever an attack happens at a place we didn’t expect it, whether that’s a high school, a federal building, a Manhattan landmark or a multiplex movie house. We sit stunned for a few hours, days or weeks, then try to find normalcy, inching back, cautiously reclaiming at least some of the territory that was ours.

This goes beyond a single, horrific incident, though. Even before the killing, sick fans made death threats against those daring to criticize their beloved film franchise. The anonymity of website feedback forms opened the door to either perverse retribution fantasies or frightening threats, depending on how seriously you take them. Even experienced pollsters couldn’t tell you if these are isolated crazies or reflective of a larger population that can’t see that threats aren’t jokes and that movies aren’t as important as human lives.

Yes, I’ve seen “The Dark Knight Rises.” I went the day after the shootings, but before I had been exposed to more than a headline about the massacre.

If this were a movie unattached to a tragedy, I’d go into detail about how the movie’s

positives—a good use of Catwoman, nice work from Michael Caine, and an avoidance of excess computer-generated effects—were dragged down by an uninteresting villain (who sounds annoyingly like Sean Connery voicing the fire-breather in “Dragonheart”), some impossible-to-buy action (the Gotham City cops apparently learned their fighting style from the redcoats), and a grimness that is admirable but often not entertaining.

I’d elaborate on how Christopher Nolan, the film’s driving force, certainly knows how to hold a not-very-fun funhouse mirror up to our world. But I’d follow with how I found less to engage with than in his previous two outings and had little investment in the outcomes of its characters. Seemingly endless fight scenes can have that effect.

It’s hard to write a sentence about “The Dark Knight Rises,” though, without thinking of the real-life murder victims and their families. It’s difficult to contemplate the movie without wondering what’s going on in the minds of people hooked on first-person-shooter games who see in this film a reflection of the world they see on their home screens. If you buy into a world where good citizens can quickly turn into marauding, morality-free monsters—if that’s the world you engage with more than the real one—then a pre-emptive strike might seem like a sensible action.

No, I don’t think the killings in Colorado can be blamed on superhero movies or video games. Too many people enjoy those forms of entertainment without committing unthinkable acts. But for those who have taken first-person-shooter video games from an entertaining distraction to a time-sucking lifestyle, it might be difficult to see the positive message in Nolan’s “Batman” saga.

For all its flaws, “The Dark Knight Rises” says that we all have the potential to be heroes.

Yes, it says life can be difficult and complicated and heroes can’t prevent every sick person from committing unthinkable acts. But it’s clear in its position that being numb to the pain of others is not a desirable quality.

Sadly, one young man didn’t get that message.

Like the rest of us helplessly reading horrific details out of Aurora, I hope his peers there and elsewhere do.•

__________

This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT