IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEWS: Breaking with the past at Tut show

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry

Before his tomb was unearthed in 1922, King Tutankhamun's main claim to historic fame was that he reversed the monotheistic religious reforms of his predecessor, Akhenaten of Amharna. Tut, who ruled Egypt from age 10 to 19, set things back to polytheism.

If you are like me, this historical tidbit will come as news. I entered "Tutankhamun: The Golden King and the Great Pharoahs" (at the Children's Museum of Indianapolis through Oct. 25) with a limited knowledge of Egyptian history—and by limited, I mean loose threads picked up from a handful of Mummy movies, the Bible, and a few too many productions of "Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat."

What I did know about was the Tut phenomenon—the throngs of people pulled almost magnetically to previous blockbuster King Tut tours around the world. I had read, years ago, "Making the Mummies Dance" by former Metropolitan Museum of Art curator Thomas Hoving, who is credited by many as the man who changed the way museums do business by focusing on blockbuster exhibitions. Still, even years after Hoving's Met show, Tut still means big box office, with variations on that show drawing crowds around the world.

The current show, organized by National Geographic, Arts and Exhibitions International, and AEG Exhibitions, with cooperation from the Egyptian Supreme Council of Antiquities, features more than 100 artifacts, drawn from Tut's tomb itself and other sites. And, as in other cities, it is likely to provoke rage in many critics, historians and art aficionados.

As with top TV shows, Broadway blockbusters, and top-40 songs, the snobbish question arises: Can something this popular be of real value? My answer after visiting the show is, of course.

Because when you get past all the politics (there's a lot associated with this show and with archeological shows in general), there remain the objects themselves: a wide array of glorious items in pristine condition. The gold of the Funeral Mask of Psusennes I shines ethereally. The colors of the Collar of Neferuptah are rich and vibrant.

There's also the rush of history they bring—the big-picture feeling of the sands of time slipping through our fingers. More powerful, for me, than the golden treasures was the Colossal Statue of Arkenaten, with its missing limbs and damaged torso seeming like the perfect metaphor for our attempts to hang onto history as the elements (and our baser instincts) wear it away.

The cinematic tone to the entryway and the star-appeal of Harrison Ford assisting with the audio narration (which I highly recommend using) both enhance and diminish the experience. At times, I yearned for the silence that must have met archeologist Howard Carter when, after years of searching, he first entered Tut's chamber of wonders. (For the record, I attended on a sparsely populated media day, before the ticketed crowds arrived. Your noise level will no doubt be higher.)

You'll probably leave with questions. I was curious about the lack of reference (unless I missed something) to the slaves who were so vital to the Pharoah's lifestyle. I didn't get much sense of Egyptian society at that time beyond the families of the Pharoahs. And I suspect there will be disappointment from some that there's no mummy and, what looks like a full-sized sarcophagus in the ads, is actually a Canopic Coffinette, built to house vital organs, not a full body.

Going in, I wondered if such a show would work in this venue. But housing it here turns out to be an enhancement. With its entryway dinosaurs, central water clock and constant sense of discovery, our Children's Museum is infused with optimism and a sense of impending discovery. Rather than trivializing the treasures, the context gives it a newfound freshness. To best enjoy your visit with Tut, I suggest entering with the patience of an adult and the sense of wonder of a child.

___

Visit ibj.com/artsfor additional reviews, previews and arts discussion. Twitter: IBJarts

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.

ADVERTISEMENT