LOU'S VIEWS: City Ballet benefit rises to the occasion again

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry

When it comes to dining, it’s difficult to go wrong when top chefs combine the best ingredients. That doesn’t, however, mean every combination of those ingredients is going to come out tasting identical.

The same holds true for multi-performer events. Take, for instance, “An Evening with the Stars” Indianapolis City Ballet gala, which was presented at the Murat Theatre Sept. 11.

This year’s event blockbuster used the same formula as the one from 2009—bringing some of today’s greatest young dancers from some of the most prestigious companies in the world to town to do what they do best. The show, once again, mixed traditional ballet work with more contemporary choreography.

But it was a very different show. Still excellent—but different. In this case, the traditional won out over the contemporary. We were the privileged witnesses of the best of an art form, rather than being offered a peek at its future.

The evening kicked off with a world premiere.

A&E Daniil Simkin soared to Jacques Brel’s music at the City Ballet’s benefit. (Photo Courtesy Gene Schiavone)

Choreographer Margo Sappington took American Ballet Theatre’s Vitali Krauchenka and World Ballet Competition second placer Veronika Verterich on an Astaire/Rogers spin set to Ella Fitzgerald singing Cole Porter’s “Night and Day.” It proved cool rather than hot, setting the tone for much of the elegant evening.

“Effortless” is a term bandied about often with artists, but the term applies to Boston Ballet’s Misa Kuranaga and ABT’s Daniil Simkin. Their “anything you can do” competitive energy highlighted the pas de deux from “Le Corsaire.” Simkin returned in the second act for one of the show’s only solo pieces, set to Jacques Brel’s “Les Bourgeois.” If they ever cast “Harry Potter: The Ballet,” this guy is a lock for the part.

Dance closer to—but not too near—the edge was represented by Elisa Carrillo Cabrera and Mikhail Kaniskin of the Berlin Ballet, and it shouldn’t be held against them that their outstanding work didn’t have the fire of last year’s Stuttgart Ballet duo. Their “Kazimir’s Colours,” in which the passive-aggressive Cabrera seems to want to escape, but not get too far from, Kaniskin, was highlighted by magnificent leaps—often with Cabrera landing on Kaniskin’s back.

They followed in Act Two with Michael Forsythe’s 1987 groundbreaker “In the Middle Somewhat Elevated,”

which felt more like a landmark than a look forward. But when will the dance students in the audience—and the rest of us—ever get a chance to see the piece performed this well?

Yuan Yuan Tan and Damian Smith offered a moving meditation on grace and dependence with the pas de deux from “The Fifth Season,” returning later for Edwaard Liang’s “Distant Cries,” in which not-quite-matching couples—clear from the dancers’ angles and attitudes—struggle with intimacy and pain. It offered perhaps the evening’s most memorable imagery.

ABT’s Julie Kent and Marcelo Gomes—joined by accomplished pianist Emily J. Wong—served to fill the narrative slots in the program, closing the first half with “Lady of the Camellias’” third act pas de deux and bringing a strong sense of danger and dread to Lar Lubovitch’s “Othello” in the second.

A&E The Bolshoi Ballet’s Natalia Osipova and Ivan Vasiliev made the brutal art look easy. (Photo Courtesy Gene Schiavone)

The stars among the stars this time out, though, were Natalia Osipova and Ivan Vasiliev of the Bolshoi Ballet. Let’s just admit it: There’s a show-off quality to some of the best in just about any field. There’s no shame in the fact that great dancers can awe us for some of the same reasons slam-dunking basketball giants can: Thanks to training and talent and more training, they can do things we cannot. They represent an ideal and in them we see and marvel at human potential.

So if Vasiliev seemed a little full of himself, so be it. There’s something superhuman in his airborne twists, seemingly endless leaps, and, “You think that was something, wait until you see this” moves. And Osipova provided just the right charming counterpoint. With a Leslie Caron-like spirit and technique to burn, Osipova never let the audience forget that the stage belonged as much to her as to her masculine partner.

And there was Miguel Quinones, featured in the only returning piece from last year’s gala. Dave Parsons’ “Caught” is dance but also something way beyond. This time, the precise timing and soul-grabbing yearning took the audience less by surprise, but the result was six unforgettable minutes that celebrated not just the dancer and the choreographer but also, somehow, all the things we think are impossible.

The exciting and seemingly endless variations the show provided remind us that ballet still has the power to surprise and thrill.

Here’s hoping that what happened on stage on the 11th inspires the Indianapolis City Ballet to continue its goal of bringing—and creating—excellence. And that the dancers in the audience see that their art can be vital, moving, powerful, fun and important all at the same time.•


This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.


  • I hope so, too!
    I loved reading this review, Lou, and I agree 100% with the final paragraph!

    Hope Baugh
    Indy Theatre Habit

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Cramer agrees...says don't buy it and sell it if you own it! Their "pay to play" cost is this issue. As long as they charge customers, they never will attain the critical mass needed to be a successful on company...Jim Cramer quote.

  2. My responses to some of the comments would include the following: 1. Our offer which included the forgiveness of debt (this is an immediate forgiveness and is not "spread over many years")represents debt that due to a reduction of interest rates in the economy arguably represents consideration together with the cash component of our offer that exceeds the $2.1 million apparently offered by another party. 2. The previous $2.1 million cash offer that was turned down by the CRC would have netted the CRC substantially less than $2.1 million. As a result even in hindsight the CRC was wise in turning down that offer. 3. With regard to "concerned Carmelite's" discussion of the previous financing Pedcor gave up $16.5 million in City debt in addition to the conveyance of the garage (appraised at $13 million)in exchange for the $22.5 million cash and debt obligations. The local media never discussed the $16.5 million in debt that we gave up which would show that we gave $29.5 million in value for the $23.5 million. 4.Pedcor would have been much happier if Brian was still operating his Deli and only made this offer as we believe that we can redevelop the building into something that will be better for the City and City Center where both Pedcor the citizens of Carmel have a large investment. Bruce Cordingley, President, Pedcor

  3. I've been looking for news on Corner Bakery, too, but there doesn't seem to be any info out there. I prefer them over Panera and Paradise so can't wait to see where they'll be!

  4. WGN actually is two channels: 1. WGN Chicago, seen only in Chicago (and parts of Canada) - this station is one of the flagship CW affiliates. 2. WGN America - a nationwide cable channel that doesn't carry any CW programming, and doesn't have local affiliates. (In addition, as WGN is owned by Tribune, just like WTTV, WTTK, and WXIN, I can't imagine they would do anything to help WISH.) In Indianapolis, CW programming is already seen on WTTV 4 and WTTK 29, and when CBS takes over those stations' main channels, the CW will move to a sub channel, such as 4.2 or 4.3 and 29.2 or 29.3. TBS is only a cable channel these days and does not affiliate with local stations. WISH could move the MyNetwork affiliation from WNDY 23 to WISH 8, but I am beginning to think they may prefer to put together their own lineup of syndicated programming instead. While much of it would be "reruns" from broadcast or cable, that's pretty much what the MyNetwork does these days anyway. So since WISH has the choice, they may want to customize their lineup by choosing programs that they feel will garner better ratings in this market.

  5. The Pedcor debt is from the CRC paying ~$23M for the Pedcor's parking garage at City Center that is apprased at $13M. Why did we pay over the top money for a private businesses parking? What did we get out of it? Pedcor got free parking for their apartment and business tenants. Pedcor now gets another building for free that taxpayers have ~$3M tied up in. This is NOT a win win for taxpayers. It is just a win for Pedcor who contributes heavily to the Friends of Jim Brainard. The campaign reports are on the Hamilton County website. http://www2.hamiltoncounty.in.gov/publicdocs/Campaign%20Finance%20Images/defaultfiles.asp?ARG1=Campaign Finance Images&ARG2=/Brainard, Jim