LOU'S VIEWS: City Ballet benefit rises to the occasion again

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry

When it comes to dining, it’s difficult to go wrong when top chefs combine the best ingredients. That doesn’t, however, mean every combination of those ingredients is going to come out tasting identical.

The same holds true for multi-performer events. Take, for instance, “An Evening with the Stars” Indianapolis City Ballet gala, which was presented at the Murat Theatre Sept. 11.

This year’s event blockbuster used the same formula as the one from 2009—bringing some of today’s greatest young dancers from some of the most prestigious companies in the world to town to do what they do best. The show, once again, mixed traditional ballet work with more contemporary choreography.

But it was a very different show. Still excellent—but different. In this case, the traditional won out over the contemporary. We were the privileged witnesses of the best of an art form, rather than being offered a peek at its future.

The evening kicked off with a world premiere.

A&E Daniil Simkin soared to Jacques Brel’s music at the City Ballet’s benefit. (Photo Courtesy Gene Schiavone)

Choreographer Margo Sappington took American Ballet Theatre’s Vitali Krauchenka and World Ballet Competition second placer Veronika Verterich on an Astaire/Rogers spin set to Ella Fitzgerald singing Cole Porter’s “Night and Day.” It proved cool rather than hot, setting the tone for much of the elegant evening.

“Effortless” is a term bandied about often with artists, but the term applies to Boston Ballet’s Misa Kuranaga and ABT’s Daniil Simkin. Their “anything you can do” competitive energy highlighted the pas de deux from “Le Corsaire.” Simkin returned in the second act for one of the show’s only solo pieces, set to Jacques Brel’s “Les Bourgeois.” If they ever cast “Harry Potter: The Ballet,” this guy is a lock for the part.

Dance closer to—but not too near—the edge was represented by Elisa Carrillo Cabrera and Mikhail Kaniskin of the Berlin Ballet, and it shouldn’t be held against them that their outstanding work didn’t have the fire of last year’s Stuttgart Ballet duo. Their “Kazimir’s Colours,” in which the passive-aggressive Cabrera seems to want to escape, but not get too far from, Kaniskin, was highlighted by magnificent leaps—often with Cabrera landing on Kaniskin’s back.

They followed in Act Two with Michael Forsythe’s 1987 groundbreaker “In the Middle Somewhat Elevated,”

which felt more like a landmark than a look forward. But when will the dance students in the audience—and the rest of us—ever get a chance to see the piece performed this well?

Yuan Yuan Tan and Damian Smith offered a moving meditation on grace and dependence with the pas de deux from “The Fifth Season,” returning later for Edwaard Liang’s “Distant Cries,” in which not-quite-matching couples—clear from the dancers’ angles and attitudes—struggle with intimacy and pain. It offered perhaps the evening’s most memorable imagery.

ABT’s Julie Kent and Marcelo Gomes—joined by accomplished pianist Emily J. Wong—served to fill the narrative slots in the program, closing the first half with “Lady of the Camellias’” third act pas de deux and bringing a strong sense of danger and dread to Lar Lubovitch’s “Othello” in the second.

A&E The Bolshoi Ballet’s Natalia Osipova and Ivan Vasiliev made the brutal art look easy. (Photo Courtesy Gene Schiavone)

The stars among the stars this time out, though, were Natalia Osipova and Ivan Vasiliev of the Bolshoi Ballet. Let’s just admit it: There’s a show-off quality to some of the best in just about any field. There’s no shame in the fact that great dancers can awe us for some of the same reasons slam-dunking basketball giants can: Thanks to training and talent and more training, they can do things we cannot. They represent an ideal and in them we see and marvel at human potential.

So if Vasiliev seemed a little full of himself, so be it. There’s something superhuman in his airborne twists, seemingly endless leaps, and, “You think that was something, wait until you see this” moves. And Osipova provided just the right charming counterpoint. With a Leslie Caron-like spirit and technique to burn, Osipova never let the audience forget that the stage belonged as much to her as to her masculine partner.

And there was Miguel Quinones, featured in the only returning piece from last year’s gala. Dave Parsons’ “Caught” is dance but also something way beyond. This time, the precise timing and soul-grabbing yearning took the audience less by surprise, but the result was six unforgettable minutes that celebrated not just the dancer and the choreographer but also, somehow, all the things we think are impossible.

The exciting and seemingly endless variations the show provided remind us that ballet still has the power to surprise and thrill.

Here’s hoping that what happened on stage on the 11th inspires the Indianapolis City Ballet to continue its goal of bringing—and creating—excellence. And that the dancers in the audience see that their art can be vital, moving, powerful, fun and important all at the same time.•


This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.


  • I hope so, too!
    I loved reading this review, Lou, and I agree 100% with the final paragraph!

    Hope Baugh
    Indy Theatre Habit

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?