IBJOpinion

LOU's VIEWS: ‘Cock Fight’ turns Phoenix into barbed-wire arena

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry

After being won over by the Phoenix Theatre’s production of “The Cock Fight Play” (running through July 6), I couldn’t help but wonder if playwright Mike Bartlett wrote the core text and then came up with the title/design concept or vice versa. In other words, which came first, the rooster or the play?

Let’s talk about the play itself, first. It’s an intimate, no-intermission piece about the question marks in a relationship. John (Chris Roe), on a hiatus from his partner M (Scot Greenwell), has an intimate relationship with W (Sarah McGee, in a Phoenix debut that promises an interesting future here).

Does that mean he’s bisexual? Born-again straight? Just open to experimentation? He isn’t sure—and when he finds himself in a pick-a-team position, he begins to wonder if the next step in liberation is getting rid of labels.
 

ae-views-zrp-3557-15col.jpg Minimal staging starkly contrast with rich characters in the Phoenix Theatre’s “The Cock Fight Play.” (Photo Courtesy of Zach Rosing)

Beyond the pretense of denying full names to John’s partners, these are all full-blooded humans, complicated, occasionally annoying, and mercifully short of tacked-on traits that many a playwright grafts with the theory that they make characters more interesting. There’s a fourth character, who proved a low-key, out-of-left-field, unexpected choice that’s rare in theater.

Now, about the title and set. The original title of the play does not include “The” “Fight” and “Play.” And the set is a barbed-wire-surrounded arena suited for the brutal gaming of the adjusted title. I don’t question Bartlett’s desire to garner attention for what could be perceived as yet another young-man-tries-to-find-his-sexual-identity play. But while the title might draw curiosity from producers and theatergoers—and while the set garners attention, especially from those used to seeing the Phoenix mainstage in its conventional format—neither is really needed. “The Cock Fight Play” stands strongly enough on its own … especially when given the kind of exemplary production that director Bryan Fonseca has pulled off here.•

__________

This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • SO no comments on the actors?
    Appreciate the background on the play and info on the staging, but since seems more like a preview article than a review. Was that the intent?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT