IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEWS: Dog days at Clowes with national tour of 'Dalmatians' musical

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry

This week, canines at Clowes, sisters in the suburbs, pals searching for Paul, and the Cabaret’s new digs at the Columbia Club.
__________

Most grown-ups, being wise, make expectation adjustments when they go to children’s theater. The primary goal of these events, they figure, is to entertain the young ones, and if some moments of grown-up pleasure happen, well, that’s a bonus.
 

A&E The humans tower above the pets—thanks to stilted costumes—in the national tour of “The 101 Dalmations Musical.” Real dogs do make brief, but memorable, appearances. (Photo/Joan Marcus)

It is possible, of course, for children’s theater to transcend to a blissful spot where adults enjoy a show just as much as kids do. From “Annie” to “The Lion King” and beyond, the potential is always there that creative folks will win out over the purely business-minded and create something of greater value than the next Kid-TV-Show-Live! arena extravaganza.

Clearly, some effort was made to raise “The 101 Dalmatians Musical” into those ranks. The show, whose national tour stopped at Clowes Hall March 9-14, hired Broadway pro Jerry Zaks to direct, commissioned Dennis DeYoung of Styx fame to compose the score, and hired an established, talented core for the cast. They’ve also figured out ways to punctuate the show with actual dogs (even if necessity calls for the title pooches to be played by humans, puppets and cut-outs most of the time).
  They’ve also gone to a lot of trouble to construct stilted costumes for the humans so they tower above the actors-playing-dogs.

The problem is that no convincing case is made that this show has any business being a musical, let alone being on stage. No characters experience any sort of personal evolution. Think of the journey Simba in “The Lion King” goes through, or the evolving romance of the Beast and Belle. In contrast, Pongo and Missus are just a pair of dogs whose family is threatened by a lunatic.

Even potentially strong emotional moments are watered down —- particularly involving Perdita, a Dalmatian whose husband and kids are missing.

As for the music, it’s OK in a direct-to-DVD-sequel sort of way.

Still, “The 101 Dalmatians Musical” is a marked improvement over last season’s abysmal “Chitty Chitty Bang Bang.” And the real dogs are immensely appealing.
__________

I have a long-standing fondness for the Little Sisters of Hoboken, the cloister of habited divas who evolved from a line of greeting cards into the quintet of characters in Dan Goggin’s musical “Nunsense.”

That’s largely because, unlike other theater-for-people-who-don’t-really-go-to-theater shows, “Nunsense” gives its actresses license to be playful. The message is clear that none of this wackiness really matters. It’s surprising and charming when a tender moment sneaks in, when the Saint jokes and easy audience jibes give way to a hint of sincerity. Or when a tune proves catchier than those in more ambitious shows and when, in the end, you realize how much you really like these ladies.

In Actors Theatre of Indiana’s production (through March 28 at the Carmel Community Playhouse), it sometimes seems the degree of Catholic knowledge isn’t that deep. And the trio of younger sisters could be better differentiated (street-smart Sister Mary Robert Anne, for instance, sometimes seems as wide-eyed and clueless as Sister Mary Amnesia). But all sound terrific and the show remains a hoot. And I’d check the roof for structural damage after Sister Mary Hubert (Claire Wilcher) lets loose on the arbitrarily show-ending number “Holier Than Thou.”
__________

Having worked together on the piece for several years, the troika of writer/actor/director that created “After Paul McCartney” (which ran through March 14 at the Indiana Repertory Theatre) found richness that would be near impossible in a traditional few-week rehearsal period.

Those rich moments and sharply etched characters (all from the one-man cast of Rob Johansen), helped balance the preponderance of coincidences that marred the show’s quest plot. And while an ambiguous ending seemed to raise an unsatisfied “Huh?” from the audience, playwright (and Nuvo arts scribe) David Hoppe’s nuanced story of a search for the title Beatle by a pair of adult friends raises interesting questions about the relationship between musician and fan.
__________

The Cabaret, which spent last year at the Connoisseur Room, now is comfortably ensconced at the Columbia Club, where singer/songwriter Amanda McBroom offered a strong show March 5-6.

While the room has lost some of its predecessor’s tightly packed intimacy, the feeling is now supper-club swanky. And the billowing backdrop, the Monument Circle view, and the knowledge that Hoagy Carmichael’s piano is upstairs add to its sophisticated pleasure.

McBroom promised a celebration of the music of French legend Jacques Brel, but saved his songs for after intermission. Before that, she focused mostly on her own tunes, ranging from the trying-too-hard, maudlin “Wheels,” to the stunningly specific “Errol Flynn,” a tribute to her supporting actor father that is as beautifully constructed as her biggest hit, “The Rose,” (which she saved to the end.)

Hearing the Brel songs made clear the influence he has had on McBroom’s writing. And her delivery was gutsy and strong and satisfying. Banter throughout was fun and smart and seemed very sincere. I’ll admit it: It feels nice when national talent is impressed with our town—if for no other reason than it makes it more likely her cabaret peers will hear the good word and visit.

Next up at the Cabaret: Brenda Williams and Shannon Forsell in “Sirens of Song” March 26-27, then “An Evening with Melora Hardin,” featuring the supporting player from TV’s “The Office.”•
__________

This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT