IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEWS: Picks from the Heartland

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry

Embracing the Heartland Film Festival (Oct. 18-27) means overcoming one’s resistance to positivity. Oh, sure, there are people who admit that they like happy endings and positive human values. But there seem to be just as many who like to come across as cynical, world-weary and nihilistic. To enjoy Heartland, you’ve got to get over that.

That isn’t to say bad things don’t happen in the worlds depicted in Heartland flicks. Far from it—especially in the documentaries. It’s just that even the roughest among them are tempered with a sense that the viewer can somehow have a positive impact on the world.

This time around, I served on a jury for Heartland—helping narrow the group of already-picked fiction flicks to the ones that will be designated award winners. Even so, I haven’t seen half of what this year’s Heartland has to offer. But I can make some recommendations based on those I did see.

ae-heartland-starry-starry-night-15col.jpg Of the 1,200 films submitted to this year’s fest, just over 100 (including “Starry, Starry Night,” above)” made the cut. (Photo courtesy of Heartland Film Festival)

Let’s start with “Starry, Starry Night, a beautiful, inventive and visually stunning tale of a young girl who makes a new friend in the midst of her parents’ breakup and her grandfather’s death. I like when a film can knock you out with judicious use of special effects without the need to go overboard (Think “Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind”), and director Tom Lin has a knack for sneaking in magic before you realize what’s happening. Yes, the title refers to Van Gogh’s painting, and the way art is used here is fresh and powerful.

Art is also integral to the documentary “All Me: The Life and Times of Winfred Rembert. The subject is an artist who spent seven years on a Georgia chain gang. You might think you’ve heard this sort of story before, but the way Rembert uses his life in his artwork (every piece of which is autobiographical) and the remarkable love story that emerges between him and his wife, sets this film apart.

Non-romantic love is the key to “Dave, a lazily titled look into the life of a former basketball star who, having grown up fatherless, wants to help another fatherless outcast emerge from his shell. The story is terrific and the real-life characters vivid. If its makers hadn’t fallen in love with their footage, it could have been great rather than merely good.

There is a hint of a love story in one sequence of “Nothing Like Chocolate, a documentary about American Mott Green’s efforts to run a chocolate cooperative in Grenada that respects and fairly treats local growers. I won’t say more, but the surprising sweetness adds flavor to an already interesting look at the cocoa business—and the blind eye that we turn to the horrible conditions under which much of it is produced, particularly in the Ivory Coast.

Overseas issues are central to much of what you’ll see at Heartland. I was pleased to see unexpectedly detailed characters in “A Bottle in the Gaza Sea, based on a teen novel about a Jewish girl from France living in Jerusalem who strikes up a pen pal relationship with a Palestinian boy. “Valley of Saints, while low on plot, is rich in detail of its Kashmir residents during a military crackdown. And stories all over the world are kaleidoscoped together in “Who Cares?, a Brazilian film exploring social entrepreneurs—citizens attempting to make a difference. It makes no secret of its inspirational mission, but it still works.

Inspiring in a different way is “Caris’ Peace, an often uncomfortable and slightly amateurish but riveting account of the efforts of actress Caris Corfman to perform a one-woman play despite brain damage that struck her with short-term memory loss. If you can’t image such a feat, join the club … and watch the film. You might find the everyday challenges in your own life suddenly seem less daunting.

ae-caines-arcade2-15col.jpg Like its creative subject, the Heartland film “Caine’s Arcade” is short but powerful. (Photo courtesy of Heartland Film Festival)

What struck me most about “Trash Dance” wasn’t extraordinary artistic achievement, but the way the film celebrates the ordinary. Imagine journalist Studs Terkel as a choreographer and you might get a sense of what’s happening here. In “Trash Dance,” choreographer Allison Orr somehow talked city sanitation workers into allowing her to create a dance performance using them … and their trucks. What could have been a very short film—you can imagine both the management and the workers laughing her out of the truck yard—turns into a joyful celebration of both the workers and of art.

And while I didn’t get to see many of the short films, I would be remiss if I didn’t point you toward “Caine’s Arcade, which will not only introduce you to a cool kid who built a cardboard game room in his father’s store, but also may well restore your faith in the world.

(And lest you think I’m a Pollyanna about Heartland, let me add that “Hayfever” left me cold, “The Citizen” would be awkward enough without Cary Elwes in a truly awful supporting performance, and “Not That Funny” isn’t at all.)•

__________

This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Caris' Peace
    Thank you Lou for pic of Caris' Peace as one the festival films.. means a lot and I hope audiences will come to be inspired by Caris' courage and art. We will also have 2 neuroscientists there for the 26th screening for post-film discussion on memory.
  • "Dave" now leaner
    Just got word that about 14 minutes have been trimmed from "Dave." The new version--which I haven't seen--will be screened at Heatland. --Lou

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT