IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEWS: Thinking magically at the Indiana Repertory Theatre

Lou Harry
February 27, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry

“It will happen to you.”

That’s what Joan Didion tells us right up front in “The Year of Magical Thinking,” the one-woman play based on her memoir of the same name. She’s talking about death. Not your death. The death of those you love.

“I’m telling you what you need to know,” she says. “That’s why I’m here.”

Death isn’t something danced around in Didion’s play (being presented through March 7 as part of the Indiana Repertory Theatre’s “Going Solo” festival of one-character pieces). Death is front and center, infusing nearly every line of the show.  

AE story art Fontaine Syer plays author Joan Didion in the autobiographical one-woman show “The Year of Magical Thinking.” (Photos Courtesy Indiana Repertory Theatre)

Here, death doesn’t open the door to a heavenly reward, it doesn’t make its victims noble, and it doesn’t empower the ones it abandons. It doesn’t cause music to swell.

And it happens suddenly.

“The Year of Magical Thinking” concerns the sudden death of Didion’s husband—which occurred while the family was still in turmoil from the inexplicable illness of her only child, an adult daughter who died within the same year.

It is, of course, impossible to imagine such two-fold grief. For some who have suffered their own losses, it will be impossible to imagine wanting to sit through a play about such a story. The pain that generated the creation of the book and play can’t help but mix with the pain of the memories it evokes in the audience. I doubt if anyone will be able to watch it without thinking about the love ones they’ve lost—and the process it took to continue with their lives.

It took me not only to my own losses, but also to other narratives of grief. For me, those include James Agee’s “A Death in the Family,” which I reread every few years for its remarkable insight, honest poetry and multiple perspectives. And William Wharton’s lesser-known but remarkably gutsy “Ever After: A Father’s True Story,” in which he gives not only his own perspective on the death of his daughter and her family, but also attempts to assume her persona and write as her in the first person. Like I said, gutsy.

And, of course, there’s that final, aching scene in “Our Town.” Only in Thornton Wilder’s play, we get death primarily from the point of view of the dead, not the survivor.

For survivor Joan Didion (here played by Fontaine Syer, from the Indiana University theater department faculty), the process involved trying to think magically—to believe that one’s thoughts can change the physical world. If Didion doesn’t clear the closet of her husband’s clothes, then he can’t be dead. Part of the power of the piece is seeing such denial come from such a seemingly rational woman.

Like a trapeze artist, a solo performer is often applauded just for getting to the end without a major slip. Syer does more than that and is particularly affecting when chronicling unpleasant, very specific details. I’m guessing her cold-ish portrayal is more like the real Didion than Vanessa Redgrave’s approach in the Broadway production (which I didn’t see). Still, there’s a virtuosity missing here that might have helped the play over its rougher spots. Elsewhere, the play has been performed without intermission, and I think that would have helped the piece build toward its not surprising conclusion.

Didion doesn’t do a particularly effective job of painting multidimensional pictures of the unseen characters. I wanted to know more about how this privileged family operated. And more about her daughter’s husband, who barely registers in Didion’s narrative. Is there jealousy in grief? Was the daughter a hostile patient? Had Didion’s husband been ill before?

For a while, I wondered if this were part of the design—perhaps the payoff would come from the realization that she didn’t really know her husband and daughter as well as she thought. But that doesn’t prove to be the case: The play just isn’t interested in painting a clear picture of anyone but Didion. And, even then, jumps in time repeatedly reminded us that Didion is telling about something that happened, not something that is happening.

Perhaps, though, it would have been even more painful to experience it with her, rather than filtered by that not-so-magical-year’s time.•

__________

This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT