IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEWS: Three long-running holiday shows offer degrees of variation

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Lou Harry

Tradition, by definition, involves familiarity. And three of the top Indy on-stage holiday offerings embrace tradition in their own way.

Let’s start with the least conventional. The seasonal selection at the Phoenix Theatre for the past seven years, “A Very Phoenix Xmas” always features a game group of actors, a mix of short plays/sketches and song and dance numbers, and an attitude that pokes fun at holiday traditions without ever seeming to want to damage them.
 

ae-phoenix-1col.jpg Rob Johansen and Charles Goad have some elfish downtime in “A Very Phoenix Xmas.” (Photo/Zach Rosing)

This year’s version, subtitled “Gettin’ Figgy With It” (running through Dec. 23), relies far less than those of previous years on locally written pieces and more on the talents of guest artists The Fourth Wall. This trio of young musicians/dancers/actors provides early-in-the-show laughs playing high-schoolers trying to slip holiday music into a politically corrected Montessori school pageant. Later, they accompany themselves for a reasonably graceful ballet on rolling office chairs, perform a bit of ballet, and I’m guessing are also among the more dexterous in an Act I-closing sock monkey dance number. (Yes, it’s that kind of show.)

Neither Chuck Goad nor Rob Johansen (both formerly of the Indiana Repertory Theatre’s “A Christmas Carol,” which I’ll get to momentarily), are called upon to do too much comedic heavy lifting here, but both showcase well in the show’s strongest sketch. In it, Goad plays a military commander fighting to repel the war on Christmas as personified by a Buddhist couple with an undecorated house. Johansen, as an enlightened Santa, makes a dramatic entrance to set things straight.

Fellow cast members Scot Greenwell and Ryan O’Shea also shine in a lump-in-the-throat performance of The Pogue’s “Fairytale of New York.” Achingly sad in a Tom Waits-ish way, the number is hindered, in part, by having to follow a seemingly unfinished sketch about a mysterious creature and a missing toe. It’s also caught in the show’s ongoing problem with coherent connectivity. An attempt at a framing device doesn’t jibe with what we see in the scenes, and well-meaning slides (including plugs for shows at other theaters) slow things down.

Still, this holiday tradition continues to show flexibility, good will, and a serious effort to bring joy to the Phoenix world.
__________

Also mixing tradition with freshness, this year’s edition of the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra’s annual “Yuletide Celebration” (through Dec. 23) scores, for the first time, a native Hoosier headliner.


ae-yuletideangela-1col.jpg Opera star Angela Brown headlines this year’s “Yuletide Celebration” with the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra. (Photo courtesy Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra)

Opera star Angela Brown gets to don more than her share of gowns, goes for occasional laughs (although having her sing “My Simple Christmas Wish” aka “Rich, Famous and Powerful” is a misstep), and subtly brings down the house with a lovely “I’ll Be Home for Christmas.” Co-host Ben Crawford’s credits might be overstated (Sorry, Angela, but he’s hardly been the leading man in “so many Broadway shows”—he briefly took over the ogre part in “Shrek” and was a “Les Miz” understudy/replacement), but he’s in good voice throughout.

There’s brightness, too, in the supporting company. Dancer Anne Nicole Beck pops in a number kicking off a 1940s radio sequence, local talent Samuel McKanney gives spark to the opening of “All I Want for Christmas is You,” and Mike Runyan combines musical chops and down-home playfulness in a harmonica segment. My favorite piece, though, came from within the ISO: violinist Michelle Kang’s spotlight performance in a “Good King Wenceslas” variation (which, alas, she’ll be handling only at select performances).
__________

There’s less variation in the IRT’s “A Christmas Carol” (through Dec. 24), but as long as the show stays this gorgeous, I won’t ever complain. Some supporting cast members have changed, but the IRT’s Scrooge and Marley, Ryan Artzberger and Robert Neal, both demonstrate the value of casting some of the city’s leading actors in what could be just a holiday toss-off.


ae-irt-15col.jpg Marley (Robert Neal) warns Scrooge (Ryan Artzberger) of the fate that may befall him in the IRT’s “A Christmas Carol.” (Photo Zach Rosing)

Both demonstrate increased nuance since I saw them in the roles two years ago. There’s now a sadness to Marley’s ghost that I never noted before. And Artzberger’s transformation seems more honestly handled. His joyful conversion seems more satisfyingly earned than that of most Scrooges I’ve spent time with.

Thanks to Artzberger and company, I left the theater in nearly as giddy a mood as Ebenezer—and was thrilled to hear chatter around me from people saying the IRT’s “A Christmas Carol” was one of the best things they’ve seen on stage.

Here’s hoping they come back for more beyond December.•

__________

This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT