IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEWS: Three long-running holiday shows offer degrees of variation

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Lou Harry

Tradition, by definition, involves familiarity. And three of the top Indy on-stage holiday offerings embrace tradition in their own way.

Let’s start with the least conventional. The seasonal selection at the Phoenix Theatre for the past seven years, “A Very Phoenix Xmas” always features a game group of actors, a mix of short plays/sketches and song and dance numbers, and an attitude that pokes fun at holiday traditions without ever seeming to want to damage them.
 

ae-phoenix-1col.jpg Rob Johansen and Charles Goad have some elfish downtime in “A Very Phoenix Xmas.” (Photo/Zach Rosing)

This year’s version, subtitled “Gettin’ Figgy With It” (running through Dec. 23), relies far less than those of previous years on locally written pieces and more on the talents of guest artists The Fourth Wall. This trio of young musicians/dancers/actors provides early-in-the-show laughs playing high-schoolers trying to slip holiday music into a politically corrected Montessori school pageant. Later, they accompany themselves for a reasonably graceful ballet on rolling office chairs, perform a bit of ballet, and I’m guessing are also among the more dexterous in an Act I-closing sock monkey dance number. (Yes, it’s that kind of show.)

Neither Chuck Goad nor Rob Johansen (both formerly of the Indiana Repertory Theatre’s “A Christmas Carol,” which I’ll get to momentarily), are called upon to do too much comedic heavy lifting here, but both showcase well in the show’s strongest sketch. In it, Goad plays a military commander fighting to repel the war on Christmas as personified by a Buddhist couple with an undecorated house. Johansen, as an enlightened Santa, makes a dramatic entrance to set things straight.

Fellow cast members Scot Greenwell and Ryan O’Shea also shine in a lump-in-the-throat performance of The Pogue’s “Fairytale of New York.” Achingly sad in a Tom Waits-ish way, the number is hindered, in part, by having to follow a seemingly unfinished sketch about a mysterious creature and a missing toe. It’s also caught in the show’s ongoing problem with coherent connectivity. An attempt at a framing device doesn’t jibe with what we see in the scenes, and well-meaning slides (including plugs for shows at other theaters) slow things down.

Still, this holiday tradition continues to show flexibility, good will, and a serious effort to bring joy to the Phoenix world.
__________

Also mixing tradition with freshness, this year’s edition of the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra’s annual “Yuletide Celebration” (through Dec. 23) scores, for the first time, a native Hoosier headliner.


ae-yuletideangela-1col.jpg Opera star Angela Brown headlines this year’s “Yuletide Celebration” with the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra. (Photo courtesy Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra)

Opera star Angela Brown gets to don more than her share of gowns, goes for occasional laughs (although having her sing “My Simple Christmas Wish” aka “Rich, Famous and Powerful” is a misstep), and subtly brings down the house with a lovely “I’ll Be Home for Christmas.” Co-host Ben Crawford’s credits might be overstated (Sorry, Angela, but he’s hardly been the leading man in “so many Broadway shows”—he briefly took over the ogre part in “Shrek” and was a “Les Miz” understudy/replacement), but he’s in good voice throughout.

There’s brightness, too, in the supporting company. Dancer Anne Nicole Beck pops in a number kicking off a 1940s radio sequence, local talent Samuel McKanney gives spark to the opening of “All I Want for Christmas is You,” and Mike Runyan combines musical chops and down-home playfulness in a harmonica segment. My favorite piece, though, came from within the ISO: violinist Michelle Kang’s spotlight performance in a “Good King Wenceslas” variation (which, alas, she’ll be handling only at select performances).
__________

There’s less variation in the IRT’s “A Christmas Carol” (through Dec. 24), but as long as the show stays this gorgeous, I won’t ever complain. Some supporting cast members have changed, but the IRT’s Scrooge and Marley, Ryan Artzberger and Robert Neal, both demonstrate the value of casting some of the city’s leading actors in what could be just a holiday toss-off.


ae-irt-15col.jpg Marley (Robert Neal) warns Scrooge (Ryan Artzberger) of the fate that may befall him in the IRT’s “A Christmas Carol.” (Photo Zach Rosing)

Both demonstrate increased nuance since I saw them in the roles two years ago. There’s now a sadness to Marley’s ghost that I never noted before. And Artzberger’s transformation seems more honestly handled. His joyful conversion seems more satisfyingly earned than that of most Scrooges I’ve spent time with.

Thanks to Artzberger and company, I left the theater in nearly as giddy a mood as Ebenezer—and was thrilled to hear chatter around me from people saying the IRT’s “A Christmas Carol” was one of the best things they’ve seen on stage.

Here’s hoping they come back for more beyond December.•

__________

This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT