IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEWS: Trying to ‘LOVE’ artist Robert Indiana

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry

His “LOVE” statue is certainly easy to love. And “Numbers” might number among your favorite sculptures. But, like me, you might have trouble warming up to much of the rest of our state’s namesake artist, who is celebrated at the Indianapolis Museum of Art in “The Essential Robert Indiana” (through May 4).

That in no way diminishes the significance of the show—the first print retrospective of Indiana’s work in 40 years.

“LOVE” and “Numbers” (and their various spin-offs) aside, Indiana’s work can feel both confrontational and off-putting. Yes, pairing the words in “EAT/DIE” invites a wide range of reactions in a viewer, but many of the other pieces include numbers, names and words understandable only to the artist.
 

ae-ima-robertindiana-1col.jpg Robert Indiana’s “Decade: Autoportrait ’75, Carver’s Pond.” (Morgan Art Foundation / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York)

“You can look,” the artist seems to say, “but don’t try to understand.” That distance and the similarities in much of the work, make it easy to glide from one road-sign-inspired, brush-stroke-hidden print—bold and free of color modulation—to the next.

“The Essential Robert Indiana” creatively gets past the artist’s deliberate roadblocks, though. In addition to incorporating explanatory material from interviews with and talks by the artist, the IMA has included a useful, succinct and mercifully silent video on the print-making process.

The curators also give visitors a hint, emotionally, into Indiana’s artistic process with a station to create your own version of Indiana’s signature autoportraits. More than just a way to keep the kids busy while you look at the work, the area leads participants in an exploration of dates, names and colors important to their own lives. Afterward, the work on the walls echoes differently.

Another wise—and playful—move is the distribution of Indiana’s “Numbers” sculptures—which have a storied history of their own—throughout the building and the IMA grounds. The iconic digits show up individually and in pairs, with “1” serving as a welcome into the exhibit proper. (A separate, free, exhibit on the fourth floor gives some of the history of “Numbers,” originally commissioned by what’s now Simon Property Group Inc. to celebrate its 20th anniversary.)

Like Indiana’s career itself, the numbers are a mix of overt commercialism and interesting artistic choices. On one hand, they serve as giant advertisements for the special exhibition which, unlike the rest of the museum, carries a cover charge. On the other, they remind us that, in art, context can strongly contribute to character.

The exhibit itself ends with Indiana’s “HOPE,” a reworking of “LOVE” that debuted as a sculpture at the 2008 Democratic Convention. Depending on your perspective, it can be read as either an exciting rebirth of one of the 20th-century’s signature artworks or the further co-opting of an already co-opted image. That’s your call.•

__________

This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

ADVERTISEMENT