Lower crop reserves raising food costs in election year

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

U.S. corn stockpiles are poised to be the smallest in 16 years by August and soybean reserves will be lower than the government expected, potentially accelerating food-price inflation in an election year.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is likely to say this week that corn inventories on Aug. 31 will be 37 percent lower than a year earlier, at 715 million bushels, the average of 32 analyst forecasts compiled by Bloomberg show. That compares with a projection of 801 million bushels last month. Soybean stockpiles will be 242 million bushels, down from a March prediction of 275 million, the survey showed.

The government is already predicting food inflation of 2.5 percent to 3.5 percent in 2012. While that’s down from 3.7 percent in 2011, it would be higher than gains in as many as five of the past eight years. Drivers are contending with gasoline prices that have jumped 20 percent this year, American Automobile Association data show. Global food costs rose for the third straight month in March, the United Nations said April 5.

“Consumers will see additional price gains this year,” said Corinne Alexander, an agricultural economist at Purdue University in Lafayette. “There will be no relief for consumers until later this year if high prices lead to large world crops.”

Corn prices averaged $6.405 a bushel on the Chicago Board of Trade in the first quarter, 2.8 percent more than in the previous three months and the fifth-highest in data going back more than a half-century. Soybeans averaged $12.752 a bushel, 8.1 percent more than in the fourth quarter. The Standard & Poor’s GSCI Agriculture Index of eight commodities rose 1.9 percent this year.

U.S. corn reserves relative to usage may fall to the lowest ever this year, Morgan Stanley and Jefferies Bache LLC forecast. The grain, used mostly in livestock feed and to make ethanol, is the biggest U.S. crop by value, followed by soybeans, hay and wheat.

Cattle futures in Chicago reached a record $1.315 a pound on Feb. 22, partly because high corn-feed costs prompted farmers to shrink herds. Retail prices of pork chops and beef were close to all-time highs in February, government data show.

The cost of living in the U.S. rose in February by the most in 10 months as gasoline costs jumped. The consumer-price index climbed 0.4 percent, after increasing 0.2 percent the prior months, the Labor Department said on March 16. The so-called core measure, which excludes more volatile food and energy costs, increased 0.1 percent.

Food inflation of 2.5 percent to 3.5 percent would still be better than in some of the past several years. Prices advanced 4 percent in 2007 and 5.5 percent in 2008, before moderating to gains of 1.8 percent in 2009 and 0.8 percent in 2010, according to the USDA. The UN’s global food index is still about 9 percent below the record reached in February 2011.

Corn surged the most in 21 months on March 30 after inventories as of March 1 fell more than analysts forecast to the lowest for that date since 2004.

“U.S. supplies are going to be tight and that means we need good weather this year to improve inventories,” said Shawn McCambridge, the senior grain analyst for Jefferies Bache in Chicago. He said reserves before the harvest will fall to 626 million bushels, or equal to 4.9 percent of consumption, below the record low of 5 percent in 1974.


  • Mostly Due to Corn Ethanol
    An easy solution for keeping food costs in check - outlaw the production of fuel from food. We are burning up 40 percent of the nations key grain (corn) what do think will happen! The massive corn crop (that we are burning up) displaces beans and wheat so their price is through the roof also. The high grain prices bankrupt livestock producers and guess what - meat is through the roof also! Most of the rising price in the grocery store can be directly traced to biofuels. Why on earth would our state or nation support a policy that systematically burns up the food supply? Rich farmers and the ag lobby are getting even richer and you and I are getting poorer because our food is being systematically burned up to buy off farm state votes and keep the Purdue ag crowd fat, dumb and happy. No economic or environmental benefit whatsoever - takes more energy to make corn ethanol than it yields and it gets two-thirds the mileage of gas. Meanwhile, where I live these rich farmers are putting unbelievable amounts of fertilizer, pesticide and fungicide on their fields which runs off into creeks and rivers. Its time people stood up to this nonsense and write their Congressman and tell them to immediately revoke the ethanol mandates and to outlaw production of fuel from food. It's just plain immoral. You would think that Purdue would show some moral leadership on this one, but they won't - too much money on the line for them. But at the end of the day, someone needs to speak up because its just wrong and its going to take a grassroots effort to get this fixed.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.