IBJNews

Lugar Tower project delayed by lack of tax credits

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Plans to renovate Lugar Tower in downtown Indianapolis and build another apartment building nearby likely will have to wait another year because the project didn’t receive the necessary tax credits to help fund it.

The Indiana Housing and Community Development Authority, which annually administers the federal tax-credit program for low-income housing projects, received 68 applications statewide and awarded them Thursday to 23 of those applicants. The Lugar Tower application wasn't chosen.

Owned by the Indianapolis Housing Agency, the 15-story, 220-unit tower at 901 Fort Wayne Ave. was built in 1974. The authority wants to renovate the complex and build another nearby at a cost of about $30 million, much of which would be backed by the tax credits.

Lugar Tower’s application simply didn’t score well enough compared with others, said Jacob Sipe, IHCDA’s multifamily director.

“There were a lot of deals that were strong, he said. “We just ran out of credits.”   

In the meantime, the project has been placed on a waiting list and still could move forward this year, but only if additional tax credits become available, or if projects that received credits fall through.

Lugar Towers is sixth of nine projects on the waiting list. The authority would need to reapply for the credits next year if the project has not received federal support by then.

The news wasn’t all bad for IHA. Three of its other projects will move forward, including a $32.2 million redevelopment of the Caravelle Commons Apartments at 16th Street and College Avenue The 65-unit complex will be demolished to make way for 155 new units, a community center, computer lab and recreational facilities.

The authority bought the complex in March 2009 from the Near North Development Corp., which took over the failed co-op in 2003. Near North stepped in to refinance, renovate and stabilize the property with an eye toward eventually selling it to a more appropriate owner.

A new Caravelle Commons, along with plans for a new Kroger supermarket at 16th and Central Avenue to replace an old and cramped existing store, could represent a turning point for the blighted stretch of 16th Street.

The $3.3 million in credits that will be doled out annually over the next 10 years for Caravelle Commons is the largest amount IHCDA has ever awarded, Sipe said.

Authority Executive Director Bud Myers said he is pleased with results of the selection process, despite Lugar Tower’s exclusion.

“I’m excited about the outcome,” he said. “We’re hoping to get some affordable housing downtown that the common man can use, but we’re on the wait list. So I’m very hopeful that it will happen.”

The authority’s Beechwood Gardens at 2915 N. Graham St. and Hawthorne Place at 5244 E. 32nd St. also received federal  backing. The cost to refurbish the two buildings, which were bundled into one application, is expected to run $21 million. Together, they contain 321 units.

The authority administers the federal program that awards tax credits to developers to renovate, acquire or construct affordable rental units. A dollar-for-dollar credit provides an incentive for private developers and investors to provide low-income housing. By reducing a developer's federal tax liability, or by selling tax credits to investors, the program can help cut the cost of development.

The amount IHCDA had available this year, bolstered by stimulus funds and more disaster credits, drew more interest from developers, Sipe said, even thought the credit market is rough.

Many investors have pulled back from buying tax credits, and Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, both of which were large purchasers, quit acquiring them after the housing market collapsed.

The authority closed last month on $23.5 million in tax-credit equity to fund the rehabilitation of 538 apartments in four complexes that received credits from IHCDA last year.

Renovations now can proceed on the following four projects:

• Twin Hills, 2210 E. 36th St., a collection of 64 mostly two- and three-bedroom apartments in 18 two-story buildings;

• Blackburn Terrace, 3091 Baltimore Ave., a 243-unit complex of mostly two- and three-bedroom units in 60 low-rise buildings;

• Laurelwood Apartments, 3340 Teakwood Drive, a 135-unit property in 39 two-story buildings; and

• Rowney Terrace, 1353 S. Riley Ave., with 96 units spread over 32 buildings.

Bruce Baird, IHA’s director of strategic planning and development, said he's confident the agency’s latest projects will receive support from investors as well.

“These are big developments,” he said. “We couldn’t raise these kinds of funds otherwise, and it allows us to make major upgrades to our properties.”

Recipients have two years to complete the projects once they receive the tax credits.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • quit being a cynic
    Barton Towers and Lugar Towers are wonderful examples of government run housing. They are good neighbors to those of us who live downtown and help add economic diversity to downtown living. Your cynicism is unwarranted.
  • This is good for downtown residents? Right!
    "Three of its other projects will move forward, including a $32.2 million redevelopment of the Caravelle Commons Apartments at 16th Street and College Avenue The 65-unit complex will be demolished to make way for 155 new units, a community center, computer lab and recreational facilities."

    This will undo so much of the progress that has happened in Fall Creek/King Park/Martindale on the Monon. There is so much crime coming from this current location - now imagine it with 3X the residents. The police protection for this area of town is horrbile since it is overseen by the IMPD East District. I'm highly disappointed in the KPADC (visionary they are not as suggested by NUVO, worthless, yes!) for the lack of support in helping neighbors protest this.
  • Good Investment
    Hoosier 99,

    Your comments overlook the fact that all the money is not being used to build 155 new units, plus a community center. Rather, the existing units have to be demolished, which costs millions of dollars itself. Also, there is new infrastructure going in, costing millions of dollars.

    In any event, I'd rather see rehabilitated units than the rundown units already there. Various areas of town have sat for decades with little to no government investment and have been left to slowly deteriorate--that's the so-called "free market" at work. Of course, that does overlook the billions of dollars in government tax credits/tax breaks and direct subsidies going to developers to build new sprawl, so I believe "free market" is a bit of misnomer.

    I am glad this is being done, and I hope Lugar Towers is next.



  • Housinjg
    Yes, Hoosier, and what norally happens to government run housing? Just another example of something goverment was NOT intended to do? When will we ever learn?
  • Tax Dollars at Work?
    So the state is using tax dollars to fund low-income apartments that are going to cost 200k+ each to build? That's a lot of money for low-income housing. You'd think they'd be able to build a lot more than 155 apartments for $32.2 million.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

    2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

    3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

    4. Send them back NOW.

    5. deport now

    ADVERTISEMENT