IBJOpinion

MARCUS: Fed programs get credit for improvements

Morton Marcus
June 26, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Morton Marcus

Horace Heliotrope sees the world in terms of persistent sadness. I’m not qualified to say he is clinically depressed, but he isn’t a happy fellow.

“The economy is as bad as we’ve seen in our lifetimes,” Horace said to me as we stood in line at the superstore checkout.

“No,” I said as cheerfully as I could. “The recession is over. The downward movement in the economy, the contraction in employment, output and income is yesterday’s story. That does not mean we are out of the ditch or that we are back to where we were before the recession. Now is a time of slow upward movement, a period of recovery.”

“Won’t last,” Horace intoned with a funereal certainty. “We’re going to have a double or triple dip; the worst is yet to come.”

“I don’t think so,” I said.

“Inflation is coming,” he announced to one and all, without raising his voice.

“Maybe,” I said, “but it may not be serious this time around.”

“Our state economy is ruined; Indiana will never be the same,” Horace proclaimed.

“Not so,” I said. “Indiana has fared fairly well in this recession. The personal income figures released last week by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis show that Indiana had a 1.2-percent increase in the first quarter of this year compared with a 0.9-percent pickup in the nation. That put us in 16th place among the 50 states.

“Furthermore,” I continued, as Horace unloaded his cart onto the checkout conveyor belt, “we also ranked 16th over the past year in personal-income growth (2.6 percent for us, 1.9 for the nation). In fact, if you look at where we are now and where we started into the recession (2008 second quarter), we’re just 0.4-percent off our peak level of personal income. The United States as a whole is 0.9-percent off its peak (not accounting for inflation). Not only is Indiana in better shape than the country, but we also beat out Ohio, Michigan, Illinois and Wisconsin—the other four states of the Great Lakes region.”

“Since when did you join the Daniels administration?” Horace asked.

“The facts are the facts,” I said. “What we should be asking is: How did all this come about?”

“So,” he asked, “how did all this come about?”

“The big, bad federal government,” I responded. “They pumped $6.3 billion into the Indiana economy through higher unemployment compensation and increased Social Security and Medicare payments. This offset entirely the decline of workers’ earnings from the second quarter of 2008 to the first quarter of this year.”

“Yeah,” Horace admitted, “but that wasn’t the stimulus money.”

“The fact is that it stimulated our economy,” I said. “You know, I’d like to see somebody put a label on every can of beans bought with unemployment compensation. I’d like to see every teacher’s or firefighter’s paycheck stamped ‘Stimulus Money Used Here.’

“How about detailing just how many dollars went to doctors, nurses, pharmacies and hospitals in the state from added Medicare and Medicaid funds paid out by the federal government? Without knowing it, many thousands of Hoosiers kept their jobs because of added direct federal spending or added federal funds flowing through state and local governments.”

“Just as I thought,” Horace said as he paid for his purchases. “Things could have been much worse, which means things were much worse than most of us realized.”

“That’s right,” I agreed, stacking my purchases on the checkout counter. “Without the stimulus money and the ongoing federal income and health maintenance funding, we would have been in a terrible mess.”

Horace looked at me with his Bassett-hound eyes. “No matter how well things seem to be going, you have to anticipate the lurking danger.”

I returned his visual challenge and said, “At minimum, we should give Uncle Sam the credit he is due.”• 

__________

Marcus taught economics for more than 30 years at Indiana University and is the former director of IU’s Business Research Center. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at mmarcus@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT