IBJOpinion

MARCUS: Is health care reform socialism?

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Morton Marcus

Mellow Marzipan is known in the hills of Owen County, near Spencer, as Aunt Mellie. She’s pushing 90, yet no one knows whose aunt she is.

She called a few days ago, all agitated.

“Sonny,” she said, “I want to be on one of those death panels. I’ve written to our senators and to Joe Biden (the president should be too busy to fuss with me), but no one has answered.”

“There are no death panels,” I said. “That’s just a lie made up to discredit the health care bill moving through Congress.”

“Well, there should be,” she said without being mollified. “Too many old folks just hanging around. I figure there should be panels made up of old folks who understand being old. They could put some juice into people who aren’t doing something and keep them going. And if folks won’t, then just let them go to the recycling center.”

“Now, Aunt Mellie,” I said, “we’re not going to have people making terminal judgments about the usefulness or productivity of other people. That’s not the way we do things in this country.”

“Well,” she said, “I never did see any use to spilling spoiled milk after the cow left the barn.”

“I don’t know what that means,” I said.

“Never you mind,” she said, “you’ll learn. Now, however, we need to get this health care thing done right. I say if a person can’t take care of herself or himself or whatever, we shouldn’t be paying for anything other than catroscopic illnesses.”

“It’s catastrophic,” I said.

“Those, too,” she added.

“Aunt Mellie,” I said, “I think that we need to see health care as we see fire protection. If your house is burning, the fire department doesn’t ask before they arrive, ‘Is it serious? Was your behavior in any way responsible for it? What’s your income? Are you insured?’ The time is coming when everyone will recognize that, as every structure in a city is entitled fire department services, so, too, each individual should receive appropriate health care, whether or not he or she can pay for it.”

“I never thought of the fire department as a form of socialism,” she said.

“Appropriate health care is not socialism and doesn’t have to be provided by government employees. We need to be those compassionate neighbors and responsible citizens you talk about so often,” I said. “In time, people will understand that we all contribute to support health care just as we all pay for the fire department. We never know when we or someone in our family will need those services and, if our neighbors have troubles, we don’t want their affliction to spread to our house.

“Now many people act as if they are immune from physical illness and immune also from economic distress. Seventy years ago, we recognized two aspects of economic need: losing a job and becoming unemployable. To assist these people, we established Social Security and unemployment compensation.”

“I wasn’t for those programs back then, but they seem to have worked all right,” Aunt Mellie said.

“Now we see medical wonders are not inexpensive,” I continued, “but medical bills can be crippling. So we are going to add health care payments to our economic toolbox because we know how devastating even short-term illness can be to a family’s income.”

“What about the death panels?” she asked.

“They don’t exist except in the minds of some very twisted people,” I said.

“Well,” she announced, “I’m not bothering with you any more today. I’ve got to find my Medicare card and catch that rural bus service that takes me to the doctor’s office.”•

__________

Marcus taught economics for more than 30 years at Indiana University and is the former director of IU’s Business Research Center. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at mmarcus@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT