Marsh taken off the market

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Grocery stores' market shareThe parent company of Marsh Supermarkets plans to continue investing in the local grocery chain after it failed to find a buyer.

Florida-based Sun Capital Partners late last year hired an investment adviser and began soliciting offers for the chain of roughly 100 stores, half in Indianapolis. Industry observers say the asking price was $130 million to $150 million. There were no takers.

Sun has cleaned up the chain’s balance sheet, spruced up dozens of stores, and tweaked the product mix since it paid $88 million in cash and assumed $237 million in debt to acquire Marsh in September 2006. But none of the moves has boosted Marsh’s market share in Indianapolis, where it still lags both Walmart and Kroger.

For regional and national grocery operators, acquiring a chain that’s third place in its home market is a tough sell, said David J. Livingston, an independent grocery analyst based in Wisconsin.

“They’re not ahead of the game like Kroger and Walmart,” he said of Marsh. “They’re struggling. They’ve been looked at by every possible acquirer, and they’ve been turned down. No one felt like they were worth the price.”

Since the private equity firm took over Marsh, it has slashed $70 million in overhead, sold $80 million in real estate, and spun off non-grocery businesses including Crystal Catering, McNamara Florist and Village Pantry.

Marsh used the proceeds to pay down most of its debt and plow $60 million into the renovation of the majority of its stores.

A company spokeswoman said Marsh remains committed to supporting and improving the brand in Indianapolis.

“Sun Capital Partners is not currently pursuing a sale of Marsh Supermarkets, nor do they expect to do so in the near future,” Connie Gardner wrote in an e-mail. “We are committed to growing the company by actively pursuing new store sites and add-on acquisitions while continuing with our remodel schedule for existing locations.”

CEO Frank Lazaran was not available to comment, but he told IBJ late last year that Sun had transformed Marsh into a pure-play grocery chain with a newly remodeled store base and a distribution network with the capacity for as many as 50 new stores.

Marsh had closed more than a dozen stores, cut more than 30 percent of a 500-person headquarters staff, cut inventories, and sold all but a few real estate parcels including the stores it had owned; the chain now leases its store space. The chain was on track for $1.1 billion in sales for 2009, down from $1.3 billion in its last year as a public company.

“This company was in trouble,” Lazaran said at the time. “We worked Marsh very hard and I can tell you we’re well-positioned going forward.”

The fact that Sun is no longer looking to sell, at least right away, should be good news for employees, said Danny O’Malia, a former Marsh executive. He said his sources inside the company say Marsh is doing better than expected and Sun hopes to stick around in hopes of wringing out a better price.

“Morale is better since they’re going to have a consistent owner,” he said. “It would appear to me that Sun’s going to be in charge for a while. For employees, it’s a better thing to know they’re committed rather than trying to unload it and cutting back.”

O’Malia expects Marsh will consider adding a few stores, buying out another small grocer, and changing the name on some of its stores again.

The chain in recent years rebranded about 30 former LoBill stores as Marsh Hometown Markets. O’Malia says Marsh may change the names again so it eventually can market the upscale Marsh the Marketplace stores and discount-oriented Hometown Market locations to separate buyers.

Adding stores and changing names on existing ones doesn’t sound like a smart strategy to Livingston, the grocery analyst.

“It doesn’t make more sense to get bigger,” he said. “You’re just going to have a bigger company with more underperforming stores.”

His question to Marsh executives: What’s the compelling reason, other than a convenient location, to shop the company’s stores? Can Marsh compete with Walmart on price? Kroger on service? Or Trader Joe’s on a unique selection?

Livingston said there are buyers interested in some of Marsh’s locations outside its core market, including a couple of stores in Ohio. Livingston represented one such potential buyer. A big drawback of buying an entire chain is the 15-percent sales drop that typically accompanies such a purchase, owing to the learning curve a new owner brings.

Marsh would be a huge undertaking for any chain to come in and run, even if Sun sold the stores for $1 million each, a price Livingston described as bargain basement.

Once you’ve fallen behind in the grocery business, it’s a tough climb to recover, he said. Marsh has fallen way behind, with a 16-percent share of the market compared with 33 percent for Walmart and 27 percent for Kroger, according to Nielsen Trade Dimensions.

“Once you lose a dollar to another grocery company, it’s going to cost you two to get those sales back,” Livingston said. “Comeback stories in this industry are few and far between.”•


  • location, location, location
    Am I the only person who shops for their groceries largely based on location ? I may go to a butcher shop or big box shop for specialty items, but 9 times out of 10 my grocery dollar goes to the chain that is in closest proximity to where I'm at...
  • From the Eastside
    Sun has recouped their purchase price from real estate and asset sales as well as reduced overhead (e.g. Marsh family). Now they want to try to dump this chain. Maybe investing a little in the stores, the people and the customers will result in more viable product. Hmmm.
  • Marsh
    Plus Marsh has done so much in the communitiy over the years, we feel like we owe them.
  • No contest
    Agreed! Marsh is far superior to Kroger in service. Plus, their meat and produce are the best. They don't need to be the largest to be viable. The prices are fair. The quality and service are worth the difference.
  • Kroger Service?
    I have to agree with Joe. Two years ago I stopped in to buy a few items at Kroger. I told the cashier I didn't have my Kroger card and asked him if he could enter something go I could get the sale prices. He told me "that would defeat the purpose of the card". That was the last time I shopped at Kroger. There is no service at Walmart period - I am not even sure those people are from this planet. I always feel like I am getting fresh food at Marsh. The butchers are great and you can get in and out very quickly.
  • come again
    Can they compete with Kroger on service? Really? I didn't know Kroger was famous for their service.

    I have lived in Indy since 1997, and when it comes to customer service, Marsh is probably in a lead. I also like their produce (which is usually the most important factor for me). Meijer is also good and cheaper than Marsh. Walmart is mostly depressing, and I don't like their produce. Kroger is a mixed bag. If you go to their store on the 16th street, it is just awful, then again, their new store on 86th street is great. Trader Joe or Fresh Market are too small/niche to compare to others.

    Now that they are privately owned, I don't know about their profit margins compared to their competitors, and if they are unique enough to survive in the long run, but I hope they make it. It's nice to have more options.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.