IBJNews

Mass Ave fine art gallery G.C. Lucas set to close

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Greg Lucas will be the second fine art gallery owner in Indianapolis to close shop this year.

Lucas announced Tuesday that he will close his gallery at 884 Massachusetts Ave. by year’s end. He will follow longtime gallery owner Mark Ruschman in exiting the business, which has been hard hit by the recession. The Ruschman Gallery on Alabama Avenue closed at the end of July after 25 years in business.

"There just isn't enough business to sustain the overhead," Lucas said.

G.C. Lucas Gallery, which opened in November 1994, represents a mix of traditional and contemporary artists. Lucas said he has a strong base of collectors in Indianapolis and will try to organize small private showings. He also plans to launch a Web site, gclucasgallery.com, next month. He will continue to represent several artists, including Karen Chevalier-Smith, Lorraine Sack and Red Rohall.

Lucas also is the representative of the estates of Hoosier Group artists William Forsyth, Constance Forsyth and Robert Selby.

The gallery is currently hosting a solo show by Sack and will open a new show in December with etchings and paintings by Montana artists Nick Oberling and Jennifer Li.

Lucas said he also has struggled to attract traffic at the east end of Mass. Ave. since this summer, when a Cultural Trail contractor put up traffic barriers.

A sale on all merchandise is under way and will continue until the gallery closes.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT