IBJNews

Massive unused Tipton plant goes back on the market

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A massive manufacturing plant in Tipton that’s never been occupied is available for $39.5 million—a steep discount from the original investment of roughly $100 million.

The Indianapolis office of St. Louis-based Cassidy Turley has been selected to market the 781,500-square-foot facility for its owner, The W.W. Reynolds Cos. of Boulder, Colo.

The plant is located on 106 acres in Tipton, north of Indianapolis, and was built by German manufacturer Getrag Corp. as part of a partnership with Chrysler LLC to build transmissions for the Detroit automaker.

The collaboration collapsed in October 2008 after Getrag filed for bankruptcy and halted work on the plant.

In 2010, W.W. Reynolds, a real estate developer, bought the building out of bankruptcy for $25 million and planned to lease it to Abound Solar Inc.

Loveland, Colo.-based Abound had hoped to hire 1,200 employees and make solar panels at the plant. But its plans to occupy the building never came to fruition.

The company gave up plans for the plant last month and filed for bankruptcy because its panels were too expensive to compete with Chinese-made products, according to the U.S. Energy Department.

Abound received a $400 million loan guarantee from the federal government as part of a stimulus package in 2010 and borrowed about $70 million against that guarantee.

Patrick Lindley, a principal of Cassidy Turley’s Indianapolis office, said in a written statement that the facility should generate national interest.

“With an original construction investment of over $100 million and an asking price of just $39.5 million,” he said, “this never-occupied manufacturing facility represents a tremendous buying opportunity.”

With 44 licensed brokers, Cassidy Turley is the city’s largest commercial real estate brokerage, according to IBJ statistics.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT