Mayor signs off on domestic-partner ordinance

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard on Thursday afternoon signed off on a proposal to provide health-care benefits to the domestic partners of city workers.

The Indianapolis City-County Council approved the proposal, 20-8, on Aug. 13.

The ordinance offers insurance coverage to both same-sex and heterosexual unmarried couples. Supporters say offering domestic-partner benefits will improve the city's image with many companies already providing such coverage.

The cities of Bloomington and Carmel and some of Indiana's universities provide benefits for employees' same-sex partners.

Council opponents raised concerns about the estimated $200,000 annual cost for the city and moral implications.

Ballard didn’t officially acknowledge the signing of the domestic-partner ordinance. But he posted on his Twitter account Thursday that “I just signed all 33 ordinances and resolutions passed last week by the City-County Council.”

Among those was the so-caled "Complete Streets" proposal, which calls for future design of city roads to be more friendly to pedestrians and bikes.



  • Joyce, You're Off Topic
    Joyce, first, it is a CHOICE to have children, so I am not sure what your comment is about "lifestyle choice?" Second, both the federal government and Indiana allow you to claim tax benefit for dependents, and this can include adults individuals that meet the dependent test. So, if your unemployed adult children meet the legal test to qualify as a dependent, then you already get a "break" when you claim them on your tax return. Also, as already noted by another poster, the revised federal law ("Obamacare") allows you to keep your adult children on your health insurance up to the age of 26. In addition, anyone who loses their job and who has earned at least $1,650 in the last 6 months before losing their job, either through being laid off or even being fired--provided they did not engage in misconduct--is eligible to receive unemployment benefits while they search for another job. Finally, this domestic partner health insurance benefit is a city ordinance that addresses only city employees. Basically, the domestic partner benefits are simply an additional form of compensation, and the benefits are similar to those offered by many private employers and also various other municipal governments in Indiana, and also by other states to their workers. In short, the ordinance is not intended to provide general relief to unemployed individuals, rather it is an earned benefit by a city employee.
  • Choices?
    Joyce - You may have missed this in the news, but "Obamacare" allows you to carry your uninsured adult children on your policy until age 26. As for being able to claim them as a dependent, there are IRS rules that make it possible to do so. Neither of your concerns are issues that can be addressed by the city.
  • ok
    having kids is a LIFESTYLE CHOICE, being born gay or straight is not
  • Congrats Indy!
    "Complete Streets" was desperately need. Good to see a Republican put partisanship aside.
  • Benefits....
    How about giving a break like this to parents who support unemployed young adults. A college degree doesn't guarantee a job. Parents should be able to carry these young people on their insurance and claim tax exemption, too. This vote supports a life-style CHOICE. Many people are not CHOOSING to be unemployed, yet can't afford health insurance.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

    2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

    3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

    4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

    5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!