IBJNews

Mayor unveils infrastructure-improvement plan details

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Mayor Greg Ballard on Tuesday provided details of his plan to upgrade city infrastructure by using revenue from an expected $425 million sale of the city’s water and sewer utilities to Citizens Energy Group.

In early April, IBJ reported that Ballard planned to use the funds from the utilities' sale to improve residential streets and sidewalks, similar to how Gov. Mitch Daniels supported his Major Moves transportation program by leasing the Indiana Toll Road for $3.8 billion.

The largest project on the city’s planned list of improvements is a $3.8 million resurfacing of 82nd Street between Allisonville Road and Interstate 69.

Also, 46th Street will get major improvements, including a $1.6 million project to replace curbs and sidewalks and to resurface the road between College and Keystone avenues, and a $1.5 million resurfacing project between Keystone and Emerson avenues.    

In addition, a portion of the city’s planned investment will be used to demolish abandoned homes that pose a public safety threat to neighborhoods, the mayor said in a prepared statement.

“Moving forward with the planned improvements will not correct all of the infrastructure problems facing our city,” Ballard said. “However, this investment represents an unprecedented effort and a significant boost for all areas of the city.”

The City-County Council must approve any final agreement with Citizens Energy. The proposal then will go before the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Non Preforming Asset
    I think that it is a smart move to get ride of the non preforming asset and turn the dollars into foundational reinvestments that will directly create preforming assets, Return on Investment. The water dollars need to be reinvested into 21 st century infrastructure. Yes, sidewalks but this is just an expense. They really need to be spent on the bio swells, green roofs and Green infrastructure, of new buildings, leveraging more State, Federal and but most importantly more Private Reinvestment, to create comprehensive community redevelopment, at location that will create the New Jobs resetting the foundations of the centers of our communities and their corridors. These financial economic plans are proven to save money and making money from the reinvestment, creating new preforming assets. When this is managed correctly the new property tax from the increased redevelopment, which is far cheaper than continually building farther and farther out pays back the to the City and the State multiply times over, and over, and over. We as citizens need to support the economic development team so they will do the right thing, create long term sustainability for our City!
  • Where did street repair $ go?
    Street maintenance responsibilities didn't just crop up because of this Water Co. deal.
    Where's the money normally budgeted for repairs each year in the City budget? They're sure as hell not spending it on street repairs!
  • water & sewer infrastructure
    It would only make sense to reinvest this money into water and sewer infrastructure only. After all, Indianapolis laggs many cities in that regard. I don't think this money (if deal is inked) should be used for sidewalks and some pet projects. Those are "sexy" projects (but help you stay in the office).

    Per some estimates, we need to invest $4 billion in the next 15 years (which would require 400% rate increases). Ballard won on anti-debt, anti-tax campaign. It makes sense since most people want free stuff, and have unrealistic expectations. I hope our mayor will give up populism, and start investing in the infrastructure (which will require rate/tax hike).
    • details, details
      There still seems to be a lot that needs to be clarified. The taxpayers/ratepayers are on the hook to pay for the sewer upgrades, thus a large increase.

      The City really has no business of owning and attempting to operate the water company. They simply don't have the resources or personnel to do it. Regardless, rates are going to go up. All the details of the financing need to be laid out. Right now we just have to take their word for it. With a number of other "deals" that have turned out bad for taxpayers, it's no wonder some are skeptical.

      Copying Daniels Major Moves model is not a good idea. Gov. Daniels and INDOT have all the money, and it's a shell game where the promised money will show up. INDOT promised a lot of projects, only to cancel or "defer" them.

      Let's get some real transparncy before we move forward. Plus let's get some reality into the money it takes to run the city. At some point we have to pay for all the services we expect.
    • 16th St.
      Could west 16th get a little attention, please. Being that it's a major route between downtown and IMS, you would think that we could put some effort into making it a bit more pleasant looking. Right now it's downright embarrassing.
    • Just Say No
      How do you think Citizens is going to come up with several hundred million for city payments and billions in necessary infrastructure improvement?

      The MOU states that they want to sell bonds on future payments in lu of taxes to get the $425 million upfront.

      Additionally the residential water and sewer rates are scheduled to increase 900% to meet the EPA's billions in unfunded sewer overflow settlement including more increases to pay for the water company purchase.
    • Water Co
      Uncommon cents - Where do you get your information. It makes no sense or cents....
      Citizens Energy would be giving an advance of the water revenues. That is NOT a loan. And that also does not equate to a 900% increase. Sheesh, get your facts straight please.
      • Whats the deal?
        Didn't Andre and the Mayor recently tout how the federal government has given Indianapolis tens of millions in grants to tear down old homes and build sidewalks?
      • How about just keeping the water company?
        Let me get this straight, the Mayor wants to sell the taxpayer owned utility to a non-profit for nearly nothing and borrow hundreds of millions from this same utility to pay for tearing down homes?

        It doesn't take much thought to see taxpayers are being given a loan, to give away a asset ,so water ratepayers can get scheduled bill increases, and have the money redirected away from required improvements in the sewer and water infrastructure, so someone can get re-elected, and campaign donors can profit.

        Giving away taxpayer assets and building debt might win elections but it doesn't keep water water bill from raising 900% or fix the water problem.

        Post a comment to this story

        COMMENTS POLICY
        We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
         
        You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
         
        Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
         
        No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
         
        We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
         

        Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

        Sponsored by
        ADVERTISEMENT

        facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
        Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
         
        Subscribe to IBJ
        1. I am also a "vet" of several Cirque shows and this one left me flat. It didn't have the amount of acrobatic stunts as the others that I have seen. I am still glad that I went to it and look forward to the next one but I put Varekai as my least favorite.

        2. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

        3. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

        4. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

        5. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

        ADVERTISEMENT