IBJNews

Mayor's redistricting plan shot down by judicial panel

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A judicial panel split down partisan lines sided with Democrats on Wednesday and threw out an Indianapolis City-County Council redistricting plan approved by the council's former GOP majority and signed into law by Republican Mayor Greg Ballard.

The Marion Superior Court panel of three Democratic judges and two Republicans ruled 3-2 that the redistricting plan was improper under Indiana law because the council drew the districts in late 2011 before a Democratic-majority council took office in 2012. A state law that applies specifically to Indianapolis says the council must redraw the district boundaries during the second year after a census, which last was conducted in 2010.

The court's majority opinion says the court now will draw new district boundaries, a step allowed by state law once the court has found the council failed to pass a proper redistricting plan.

Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard signed the current district plan into law on Jan. 1, 2012, but the three Democratic judges said the framework for the redistricting plan was created too early under the law.

An Indiana statute for Marion County says council members must redraw district boundaries during the second year after the census. The census took place in 2010, which means the boundaries should have been redrawn in 2012. Ballard contends he met that requirement by signing the plan in 2012.

“This decision represents the beginning of what we anticipated will be a multi-review process," Ballard said in a prepared statement. "We are respectful of the judicial process and will reserve comments on the merits until the final determination is made.”
 
The law allows for a direct appeal to the Indiana Supreme Court. The court also intervened in 2003 after Democrats and Republicans deadlocked over redistricting and drew the most recent council district boundaries.

Any new redistricting plan would be used for the first time in the 2015 municipal election.

Three council Democrats had sued in February to get the redistricting plan thrown out.

After the Democratic majority council was seated in January 2012, Democrats drafted a new redistricting plan and approved it along party lines late last year. Ballard vetoed it.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • If You Can't Win Elections Fair and Square...
    ...Cheat! It's much easier than convincing voters of the correctness of your position.
  • Likely to be reinstated
    The appellate courts in Indiana are mostly composed of Republican judges. Appellate judges are less likely to be affected by partisan politics. Look for the trial level 3 Democratic judges v 2 Republican judges decision to be reversed on appeal.
  • Who pays for dirty tricks
    This is a clear overreach by Republicans and the taxpayers have to pay the lawyers defending the crooks. Wasn't the legislation to eliminate the democratic at large council seats enough of a power grab. Greedy little liars in action.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

    2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

    3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

    4. Exciting times in Carmel.

    5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

    ADVERTISEMENT