IBJNews

Mayor's redistricting plan shot down by judicial panel

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A judicial panel split down partisan lines sided with Democrats on Wednesday and threw out an Indianapolis City-County Council redistricting plan approved by the council's former GOP majority and signed into law by Republican Mayor Greg Ballard.

The Marion Superior Court panel of three Democratic judges and two Republicans ruled 3-2 that the redistricting plan was improper under Indiana law because the council drew the districts in late 2011 before a Democratic-majority council took office in 2012. A state law that applies specifically to Indianapolis says the council must redraw the district boundaries during the second year after a census, which last was conducted in 2010.

The court's majority opinion says the court now will draw new district boundaries, a step allowed by state law once the court has found the council failed to pass a proper redistricting plan.

Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard signed the current district plan into law on Jan. 1, 2012, but the three Democratic judges said the framework for the redistricting plan was created too early under the law.

An Indiana statute for Marion County says council members must redraw district boundaries during the second year after the census. The census took place in 2010, which means the boundaries should have been redrawn in 2012. Ballard contends he met that requirement by signing the plan in 2012.

“This decision represents the beginning of what we anticipated will be a multi-review process," Ballard said in a prepared statement. "We are respectful of the judicial process and will reserve comments on the merits until the final determination is made.”
 
The law allows for a direct appeal to the Indiana Supreme Court. The court also intervened in 2003 after Democrats and Republicans deadlocked over redistricting and drew the most recent council district boundaries.

Any new redistricting plan would be used for the first time in the 2015 municipal election.

Three council Democrats had sued in February to get the redistricting plan thrown out.

After the Democratic majority council was seated in January 2012, Democrats drafted a new redistricting plan and approved it along party lines late last year. Ballard vetoed it.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • If You Can't Win Elections Fair and Square...
    ...Cheat! It's much easier than convincing voters of the correctness of your position.
  • Likely to be reinstated
    The appellate courts in Indiana are mostly composed of Republican judges. Appellate judges are less likely to be affected by partisan politics. Look for the trial level 3 Democratic judges v 2 Republican judges decision to be reversed on appeal.
  • Who pays for dirty tricks
    This is a clear overreach by Republicans and the taxpayers have to pay the lawyers defending the crooks. Wasn't the legislation to eliminate the democratic at large council seats enough of a power grab. Greedy little liars in action.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Why not take some time to do some research before traveling to that Indiana town or city, and find the ones that are no smoking either inside, or have a patio? People like yourself are just being selfish, and unnecessarily trying to take away all indoor venues that smokers can enjoy themselves at. Last time I checked, it is still a free country, and businesses do respond to market pressure and will ban smoking, if there's enough demand by customers for it(i.e. Linebacker Lounge in South Bend, and Rack and Helen's in New Haven, IN, outside of Fort Wayne). Indiana law already unnecessarily forced restaurants with a bar area to be no smoking, so why not support those restaurants that were forced to ban smoking against their will? Also, I'm always surprised at the number of bars that chose to ban smoking on their own, in non-ban parts of Indiana I'll sometimes travel into. Whiting, IN(just southeast of Chicago) has at least a few bars that went no smoking on their own accord, and despite no selfish government ban forcing those bars to make that move against their will! I'd much rather have a balance of both smoking and non-smoking bars, rather than a complete bar smoking ban that'll only force more bars to close their doors. And besides IMO, there are much worser things to worry about, than cigarette smoke inside a bar. If you feel a bar is too smoky, then simply walk out and take your business to a different bar!

    2. As other states are realizing the harm in jailing offenders of marijuana...Indiana steps backwards into the script of Reefer Madness. Well...you guys voted for your Gov...up to you to vote him out. Signed, Citizen of Florida...the next state to have medical marijuana.

    3. It's empowering for this niche community to know that they have an advocate on their side in case things go awry. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lrst9VXVKfE

    4. Apparently the settlement over Angie's List "bundling" charges hasn't stopped the practice! My membership is up for renewal, and I'm on my third email trying to get a "basic" membership rather than the "bundled" version they're trying to charge me for. Frustrating!!

    5. Well....as a vendor to both of these builders I guess I have the right to comment. Davis closed his doors with integrity.He paid me every penny he owed me. Estridge,STILL owes me thousands and thousands of dollars. The last few years of my life have been spent working 2 jobs, paying off the suppliers I used to work on Estridge jobs and just struggling to survive. Shame on you Paul...and shame on you IBJ! Maybe you should have contacted the hundreds of vendors that Paul stiffed. I'm sure your "rises from the ashes" spin on reporting would have contained true stories of real people who have struggled to find work and pay of their debts (something that Paul didn't even attempt to do).

    ADVERTISEMENT