Medicaid expansion could cost $54M a year

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana’s Medicaid expansion may cost much less than expected.

A new set of projections released Monday estimates that expanding Medicaid coverage as called for in President Obama’s 2010 health reform law would cost the state government less than $54 million per year on average over the next decade—far lower than projections issued by the actuarial firm hired by Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels’ administration.

The projection, compiled by the Washington, D.C.-based Urban Institute, a left-of-center think tank, accounts for savings the state could enjoy by reducing the cost of care for uninsured Hoosiers. It also assumes lower rates of participation in expanded Medicaid coverage than did a previous estimate generated for Indiana by Seattle-based Milliman Inc.

In September, Milliman estimated that Indiana would spend an average of $140 million per year from 2014 to 2020 to pay for expanded Medicaid coverage as called for by the health reform law, which is called the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act. To make it comparable with The Urban Institute's study, that figure does not include Milliman's estimates for administrative costs, increased payments to doctors, or the impact of new federal taxes on health insurers that help provide Medicaid benefits to low-income Hoosiers.

Still, The Urban Institute's analysis concludes Indiana faces a bill less than 40 percent of what Milliman estimated.

“The new state spending is really quite small as a percentage of general funds,” said John Holahan, director of the Health Policy Research Center at The Urban Institute and the primary author of the analysis, during a conference call with reporters.

The health reform law called for all states to expand eligibility for Medicaid coverage to residents making 138 percent of the federal poverty limit, or about $31,800 for a family of four. Indiana’s Medicaid program already covers children and pregnant mothers above that threshold. But it only covers adults without kids who earn less than 25 percent of the federal poverty limit, or about $5,800 per year.

The higher income threshold could bring more than 500,000 additional Hoosiers into the Medicaid program, according to Milliman’s estimates. But The Urban Institute expects just 340,000 additional Hoosiers to join an expanded Medicaid program.

Indiana does not have to expand its Medicaid program, but if it does not, it will pass up a huge amount of new federal funding. Gov.-elect Mike Pence, a Republican, has been sharply critical of the Affordable Care Act, and has said he would consider a Medicaid expansion only if Indiana is allowed to use its Healthy Indiana Plan as the vehicle for it.

Even without an expansion, Indiana will be paying more to operate Medicaid. That’s because costs and the percentage of the population eligible were expected to rise even before the health reform law passed. Also, the new law requires that most individuals obtain health insurance or else pay a fine—so it’s expected that a large number of Hoosiers who now qualify for Medicaid but have not yet signed up will do so.

This so-called “woodwork effect” was expected to add 92,000 Hoosiers to the Medicaid rolls in Milliman’s projections. But The Urban Institute estimates the “woodwork effect” at just 72,000.

If Indiana does expand Medicaid, Milliman assumed roughly 75 percent of Hoosiers eligible for Medicaid would in fact sign up. The Urban Institute assumed just 72 percent of newly eligible Americans and less than 25 percent of those already eligible for Medicaid would do so.

With those assumptions, The Urban Institute figures Indiana will spend $1 billion over the next decade to expand Medicaid. The state would spend little at first, as the federal government picks up most of the tab. But federal support would gradually decline after the initial years of the expansion.

Total federal spending in Indiana would total $17.3 billion over the next decade, according to The Urban Institute’s calculations.

The Medicaid expansion also would reduce the number of uninsured Hoosiers, whose care is now partially paid for via special Medicaid payments to hospitals. Such a reduction in the uninsured would likely reduce those special Medicaid payments, according to the Urban Institute's analysis. The resulting savings could reduce Indiana’s total bill by nearly half, so the state would spend just $537 million over the next decade—or $53.7 million per year.

By contrast, Milliman’s estimate assumed Indiana would spend $2 billion from 2014 to 2020 to pay for the expansion of Medicaid, which averages $291 million a year. That estimate does include more than $1 billion to pay for adminsitrative costs, higher payments to doctors seeing Medicaid patients and higher payments to health insurers to offset the impact of new federal taxes on them.

An expansion of Medicaid in Indiana would draw federal funding of $20.4 billion over that seven-year time frame, according to Milliman.

But the Urban Institute estimates that, on the whole, states actually will save more money from reducing the number of uninsured than they will pay in additional Medicaid coverage.

“While some states will see net savings, others will need to weigh the trade-offs between small increases in state spending in return for large gains in coverage supported by mostly federal dollars,” said Diane Rowland, executive vice president of the Kaiser Family Foundation, which released The Urban Institute’s analysis.


  • Government & Health Care
    My concern is when the Federal Government becomes involved in most things that appear to be cost savings such as this it turns out quite the opposite. Too many times we have seen the government state that something would cost a certain amount and then they come back with a comment that something was not considered,etc. and the cost skyrockets. I would much prefer that the state remains in control and allow local health care providers input as to how they may save the system dollars.
  • Bottom Line
    It's nice we can project what it will cost the state and what part the Feds will pay. The reality is though, that for now, we are one country. Whether my wife's paycheck pays our electric bill or mine does affects my bottom line the same.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I think the poster was being sarcastic and only posting or making fun of what is usually posted on here about anything being built in BR or d'town for that matter.

  2. Great news IRL fans: TURBO the IMS sanctioned movie about slugs running the Indy 500 has caught the Securities and Exchange Commission because Dreamworks had to take a $132MILLION write down...because the movie was such a flop. See, the Indy/IMS magic soiled another pair of drawers. Bwahahahahahaha! How's CARTOWN doing? HAHAHAHA...Indy is for losers.

  3. So disappointed in WIBC. This is the last straw to lose a good local morning program. I used to be able to rely on WIBC to give me good local information, news, weather and traffic on my 45 minute commute.Two incidents when I needed local, accurate information regarding severe weather were the first signs I could not now rely on WIBC. I work weekend 12 hour nights for a downtown hospital. This past winter when we had the worst snowfall in my 50 years of life, I came home on a Sunday morning, went to sleep (because I was to go back in Sunday night for another 12 hour shift), and woke up around 1 p.m. to a house with no electricity. I keep an old battery powered radio around and turned on WIBC to see what was going on with the winter storm and the roads and the power outage. Sigh. Only policital stuff. Not even a break in to update on the winter storm warning. The second weather incident occurred when I was driving home during a severe thunderstorm a few months ago. I had already gotten a call from my husband that a tornado warning was just southwest of where I had been. I turned to WIBC to find out what direction the storm was headed so I could figure out a route home, only to find Rush on the air, and again, no breaking away from this stupidity to give me information. Thank God for my phone, which gave me the warning that I was driving in an area where a tornado was seen. Thanks for nothing WIBC. Good luck to you, Steve! We need more of you and not the politics of hatred that WIBC wants to shove at us. Good thing I have Satellite radio.

  4. I read the retail roundup article and tried Burritos and Beers tonight. I'm glad I did, for the food was great. Fresh authentic Mexican food. Great seasoning on the carne asada. A must try!!! Thanks for sharing.

  5. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...