IBJNews

Assessment fees benefit Indy hospitals

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A new hospital assessment fee program created by the Indiana Medicaid system has worked out well so far for Indiana University Health and Community Health Network.

The two Indianapolis-based hospital systems enjoyed net gains of $267 million and $23 million, respectively, from the program during the fiscal year ended June 30.

Both hospital systems reported the financial gains in their third-quarter financial reports, filed in the past month. Most hospitals have yet to report on how the program affected their finances.

The assessment fee program, created by the state Legislature in 2011, is a way to increase federal matching dollars paid to Indiana’s hospitals through the federal-state Medicaid program, which pays for health care for the poor.

The federal government currently matches Indiana’s spending on Medicaid at about a 2-to-1 ratio. And federal rules allow Indiana to raise its payments to hospitals in order to draw even larger federal payments.

The hospital assessment fee is essentially a tax on hospitals to fund those higher state payments, so the hospitals can then enjoy larger federal payments.

A February projection by the Indiana Hospital Association expected new fees from the program to total $609 million per year. But the new revenue to hospitals was expected to top $828 million.

That would leave a net gain for the hospitals of nearly $220 million.

For example, IU Health paid $145 million in fees for the fiscal year ended June 30, but it received $411.8 million in additional revenue due to higher Medicaid reimbursements. So its net gain from the assessment program itself was $267 million.

However, the program also brought on a reduction in special Medicaid payments to hospitals that serve the largest numbers of Medicaid paymenys. So-called "disproportionate share" payments fell for IU Health by $122.7 million, meaning its total gain under the program totaled $144.3 million.

Community Health paid $38.6 million in additional fees but received $61.8 million in higher Medicaid payments.

Not all hospitals will be winners under the program. With IU Health and Community already raking in $168 million in net gains from the program, it’s likely that some hospitals—those that serve a small number of Medicaid patients—will actually pay more in tax than they receive in larger Medicaid payments.

That could become an issue next year when the Indiana General Assembly considers whether to renew the program for another two years.

The state government will do OK by the program, though, because it gets to keep at least 28.5 percent of the additional federal revenue generated by the assessment fees. According to the estimate by the Indiana Hospital Association, the program will generate more than $94 million in new revenue for the state.

Tight state finances forced cuts to Medicaid payments for hospitals in 2010. In nearly all cases, Medicaid payments do not cover hospitals' costs of providing care.

"Particularly with looming cuts in Medicare, better reimbursement for providing Medicaid services is a very welcome development," said Brian Tabor, the vice president of government services for the Indiana Hospital Association.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT